Providing your shoe size lets us help you find the best shoes you can buy right now.
10 |
8%
|
9 |
38%
|
8 |
38%
|
7 |
13%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
4%
|
10 |
8%
|
9 |
38%
|
8 |
38%
|
7 |
13%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
4%
|
10 |
13%
|
9 |
25%
|
8 |
33%
|
7 |
21%
|
6 |
4%
|
≤ 5 |
4%
|
10 |
4%
|
9 |
4%
|
8 |
0%
|
7 |
8%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
83%
|
10 |
25%
|
9 |
21%
|
8 |
29%
|
7 |
17%
|
6 |
8%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
38%
|
9 |
29%
|
8 |
17%
|
7 |
4%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
13%
|
10 |
17%
|
9 |
13%
|
8 |
29%
|
7 |
25%
|
6 |
8%
|
≤ 5 |
8%
|
This shoe is pretty good as far as 10mm trainers go. They are designed to be very comfortable out of the box. I even found that the rubber outsole on the bottom of the shoes held up surprisingly well. The cushion inside compressed pretty quickly for me under the ball of the foot, though (I'm 5'11", 170 lbs). This has been a pretty consistent experience for me with Pegasus models. These are nice shoes if you only expect 200 miles or less out of them, but beyond that becomes questionable due to cushioning and upper, though not the outsole.
I've been wearing the Pegasus for years. Its gone through some changes over the years but for the money its as good of a cushioned shoes as you can find.
Not too heavy and can be worn in workouts. Not a ton of support but its still comfortable enough.
When I first picked up the pegasus 32s, I was very excited to run in them. They were the same as the 31s in terms of underfoot feel. However, when it came to the upper, the 32s blew the 31s out of the water. The flywire does a great job of keeping your foot from slipping around in the shoe and although I don't think the engineered mesh is as breathable when compared to the 31s, it still allows for a substantial amount of airflow which keeps my feet cool during those 90 degree long runs and workouts. The durability on the outsole of this shoe is amazing! I have put over 500 miles on this pair and they're certainly going to make it to 700+. Another thing I would like to point out is that these shoes are great for people who have low arches but have a neutral amount of pronation. This is because the arch structure inside the shoe is very low so it won't intrude and push into the feet of someone with low/flat arches. Overall, I would definitely recommend this shoe because not only is it durable and afforable, but it is also responsive enough for workouts and provides enough cushioning for long runs.
Like the 31, the 32 wears extremely well. After 1000 km on the 31, there was virtually no wear on the sole - and the 32 looks to be going the same way, with hardly any wear at 500 km. I'd probably like a touch more mid-foot cushioning, but there's enough there to do the job. The upper design on the 32 is pretty different for Nike - I like it.
Great neutral cushioning, although the cushioning isn't the longest lasting (something typical to Nikes). I'll average 450 miles on pair.
Disappointed in the overall fit and comfort of this shoe. I loved the Pegasus 2000 and was hoping that maybe they finally managed to go back to that fit of shoe. However I was wrong. The midsole is too firm and the toe box too narrow. The loops on the side for lacing actually produced blisters when running more that 5 miles
I've been running on the Pegasus for about 200 miles. The shoe is responsive and quick - its heel support is excellent. Perhaps slightly higher drop than I'd like and surely too expensive, but overall this version is phenomenal.
took a little to break in, more comfortable than 31's, only worth it if you can't find the 31's on sale
I've been running 60-90 mpw in these, alternating pairs every day, and have no complaints. They are comforatable and I have shown progress.