Brooks Launch 2

equal comfort if not more than the Ghost which has been my "go to" shoe for years

Lighter and just as versatile for both my speed sessions and long runs.

I'm on my third pair of Brooks Launch 2s. I find them similar to the Nike Pegasus, except the Launch has more room in the toe box. The pegasus fit tight to my toes, whereas I have more room in the launch (both size 12.5). I also find the forefoot more cushioned in the Launch 2's than in the Pegasus. Overall, this has been a comfortable shoe and I've been happy with it.

It has been a very good shoe. Light weight trainer, but sturdy enough to train for a marathon or a half.

So far it's been good. I find that it's a little mushy and lacks responsiveness but on the whole, the shoe is light, comfortable, and nimble. Durability in the upper and outsole seems good but I've only been running in them for about a month and a half so we'll have to see how long they last.

I replaced the Nike Lunar Tempo with the Launch 2. On the plus side, the Launch is more durable and $10 cheaper. Fit is similar in that it's snug but not tight. So far have worn the Launch for runs as long as 9 miles and from the feel of them fully expect they could handle any distance. Obviously less important/not really important at all, but I don't like the looks of the Launch that much. Overall, I would recommend the Launch 2 for someone not looking to break the bank on a pair of trainers and who doesn't need a ton of cushioning in their daily trainers.

Possibly the best all-around running shoe I've ever worn. I didn't expect to like the Launch 2 so much, because I bought a pair of Launch 1's a few years ago and sold them after a single run because they didn't work for me at all. I gave them another try because the Launch 2 seemed to fit the shape of my foot better, and they turned out to be great. I've worn many pairs of Brooks Ghosts, but don't think I'll go back after wearing the Launch 2. They're lighter, more comfortable, and surprisingly more durable than the Ghost. I've replaced my Ghosts after 350-400 miles because they felt flat, but my pair of Launch 2s made it to 500 miles.

I typically run in a stability shoe like the Ravenna for longer runs and bought the Launch as a light shoe to wear for some faster running. While they are ok for that, I find the Ravenna better for me and I now run in the Launch for shorter recovery/easy runs. They have nice cushioning and are super comfortable. They are not supportive enough for me for long runs (anything much over an hour).

The upper is really nice, they fit like a glove. They are too heavy for racing though. But I am enjoying them, just not for what I originally intended.

Great shoe, worn it steady for over a year. Switch between the Launch and Nike Pegasus for most recovery/longer days, faster workouts I wear the Kinvara and very fast days I use flats or spikes. The Launch has enough durability for the lightness of the shoe.

I had 384 miles on the shoe.

I have been a hobby runner since 1977 with 85-87000 miles on my legs.

Running along on a steady 7 miler, I thought I had gotten a bur from a cactus in my shoe.

I stopped, took the shoe off, shook it out...nothing.

Put the shoe back on, started running, same sharp pain in heel...

Stopped again, took off the shoe, shook it out.....nothing.

Went home, got my old man glasses on, looked at my heel, a puncture wound..

Took guts of right shoe from the Launch out..ran my fingers inside, sharp pain, cut my finger!!!

A NAIL!!!! A NAIL???????

I thought shoes weren't made with nails anymore?????

I thought that was back in the day of the cobbler.......

Threw the shoes away.....

Be aware!!

I've been running in the Launch since it was introduced and I've never met a more versatile shoe. It is light enough to use in longer races, yet sturdy enough for day to day use. It also is one of the few shoes that works really well with or without orthotics. The fit is great for me, it is durable enough and the price is reasonable.