Providing your shoe size lets us help you find the best shoes you can buy right now.
10 |
0%
|
9 |
29%
|
8 |
57%
|
7 |
14%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
0%
|
9 |
29%
|
8 |
57%
|
7 |
14%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
29%
|
9 |
14%
|
8 |
57%
|
7 |
0%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
14%
|
9 |
29%
|
8 |
43%
|
7 |
14%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
0%
|
9 |
14%
|
8 |
43%
|
7 |
14%
|
6 |
14%
|
≤ 5 |
14%
|
10 |
14%
|
9 |
0%
|
8 |
43%
|
7 |
29%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
14%
|
10 |
0%
|
9 |
57%
|
8 |
43%
|
7 |
0%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
run >1000 miles in at least 4 different pairs. Mainly on roads, some trails at paces from 8:00 per mile to 4:40 per mile. Great for a daily trainer and up to tempo pace. Too heavy for anything really fast. Good on every surface I've used them on. Few changes from the 7, improved durability from the 6.
Great shoe for a runner who overpronates. They've worked every bit as well for me as the Kayanos and are significantly cheaper, especially if you go with the last years model and get them on sale. I can comfortably put 500-750 miles on a pair without injuring myself. I have wide feet so the large toebox is the main reason I keep coming back.
Shoe is an integral part on my running program hence, its very important that it protect the the whole body from injuries. It should be comfortable with adequate cushion, have a good look and most importantly be affordable.
Every time these are in the rotation, I feel they have the best, longest lasting cushioning for the stability shoes I've worn.
The Asics GT-2000 is a great shoe. As a former college runner I keep up a general level of fitness, enough to go for 4-7 mile runs on a regular basis. This shoe is comfortable for long and short runs, but not as durable as I'd expect. Seems like I could get 400-500 miles out of shoes when I was running high mileage, but now I'm barely getting 350. I really like everything else about the shoe - reasonable price, comfortable, looks good.
Very good shoe for trail runs. Good arch support. Holds up well, on rough terrain.