Enter your shoe size

Providing your shoe size lets us help you find the best shoes you can buy right now.

Shoe size

Indigo Blue/Shocking Orange

LetsRun.com Reviewer Ratings

Shoe Comparison

Shoe comparison
ASICS GT-2000 7
ASICS GT 2000 12
Brooks Ghost 15
HOKA ONE ONE Bondi 8
Image
ASICS GT-2000 7
This Shoe
ASICS GT 2000 12
Newer Version
Brooks Ghost 15
Top Rated Trainer For Sale
HOKA ONE ONE Bondi 8
Most Comfortable Trainer For Sale
Shoe Properties
Shoe Type
Trainer
Trainer
Trainer
Trainer
Pronation Control
Stability
Moderate Stability
Neutral
Neutral
Weight
10.6 oz. (men's), 8.6 oz. (women's)
9.5 oz. (men's), 8.3 oz. (women's)
9.6 oz. (men's), 8.4 oz. (women's)
11.1 oz. (men's), 10.1 oz. (women's)
Stack Height
33mm.
35mm.
35mm.
43mm.
Forefoot Height
24mm.
27mm.
23mm.
39mm.
Drop Height
9 mm.
8 mm.
12 mm.
4 mm.
Upper material
Refined 3D Fit Print mesh, Recycled Materials include:
Engineered mesh, Lycra comfort frame, Internal heel counter, Pillowed Tongue
Shoe Released
Q4 2019
Q3 2023
Q4 2022
Q3 2022
MSRP
$120
$138
$140
$165
LRC Ratings
Out of 10
Overall
8.8
8.7
9.2
9.0
Comfort
8.8
8.8
9.1
9.4
Cushioning
8.9
8.3
9.0
9.7
Durability
8.1
8.1
8.7
8.2
Appearance
8.0
8.1
8.3
7.9
Value
8.5
8.1
8.6
7.6

Reader Reviews

  • Works great

    65 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    9.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    9.0
    Durability
    9.0
    Appearance
    8.0
    Value
    8.0

    Been consistently running in different models of GT 2000 for years, mostly in the 60-80 mile per week range, and haven't had any problems with them.

  • GT 2000

    30 miles per week, overpronator, high arches
    Overall
    10.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    10.0
    Durability
    8.0
    Appearance
    8.0
    Value
    10.0

    If you are a slightly heavier runner ( over 75kg ) and you like a shoe that gives a bit of over pronation control, then don't hesitate to buy the asics GT 2000. They give a firm yet well cushioned feel not only under heel but also under the forefoot. These shoes are great all rounders; you can do anything in them from a time trial to an ultra. They also give reasonable durability. The upper will give out before you have any concerns about the sole having lost compression.

  • decent shoe despite changes

    60 miles per week, underpronator, medium arches
    Overall
    8.0
    Comfort
    8.0
    Cushioning
    7.0
    Durability
    6.0
    Appearance
    8.0
    Value
    8.0

    Still like these shoes, they just fit perfectly for my feet(or maybe my feet have been molded to fit the shoe....unsure).

    Material seems to be getting cheaper. The top cover seems to tear really easily on almost anything.

  • GT 2000...always a good ride

    50 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    9.0
    Comfort
    9.0
    Cushioning
    9.0
    Durability
    9.0
    Appearance
    9.0
    Value
    9.0

    I have been running in the 1000s and 2000s for over 15 years and they always come through.

  • consistently good for avoiding injury

    70 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    8.0
    Comfort
    9.0
    Cushioning
    9.0
    Durability
    7.0
    Appearance
    6.0
    Value
    5.0

    Previously I had a foot thing (dropped cuboid) so a podiatrist told me to switch to a more structured shoe with a strong medial post. I picked the GT-2000 and have been wearing it for most easy runs and long runs for the last 6 years. Sometimes I buy several if they are on sale for under $60. The last model (I think it was the v6) had really bad durability issues according to Amazon reviews where the top of the toe box area was ripping open very early. I skipped that version and am hoping that doesn't happen to my version 7 ones.

  • good shoe

    2 miles per week
    Overall
    10.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    10.0
    Durability
    10.0
    Appearance
    5.0
    Value
    9.0

    The shoe is very comfortable to run in, doesn’t make my ankles hurt

  • Sad They won't have narrows anymore

    25 miles per week, overpronator, low arches
    Overall
    9.0
    Comfort
    9.0
    Cushioning
    9.0
    Durability
    7.0
    Appearance
    5.0
    Value
    9.0

    Gone through three pairs of these, and they've worked well for me. I wear Powerstep insoles and they fit nicely. Haven't had any trouble with foot pain or impact injury. Version 6 had a pretty low durability, which ASICS seemed to improve on this shoe. Not a fan of the colors, pink laces aren't my thing, but very comfortable and great overall. Unfortunately, ASICS is going to discontinue narrows so I'll probably be switching back to Brooks adrenaline after this pair.

  • fairly happy

    15 miles per week, medium arches
    Overall
    6.0
    Comfort
    6.0
    Cushioning
    6.0
    Durability
    6.0
    Appearance
    7.0
    Value
    7.0

    Been wearing gt 2000 series for past 4 years. first time ive stuck with one type for a long time. i like them but they dont seem as durable as id like.

  • 19 years no injury

    70 miles per week, overpronator
    Overall
    10.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    10.0
    Durability
    8.0
    Appearance
    10.0
    Value
    10.0

    I've been using the ASICS GT-2000 as my road running shoe for 19 years and never had an injury. Whenever I switch brands, like to the Brooks Adrenaline, I get injured.

  • Long-lasting and feels right

    30 miles per week, overpronator, medium arches
    Overall
    10.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    9.0
    Durability
    9.0
    Appearance
    8.0
    Value
    8.0

    I switched to from Nike to Asics 15 years ago because the Asics sole lasts much longer. I'm never switching back. The shoe lasts a long time and has the right amount of cushioning -- not too little and not too much.