Enter your shoe size

Providing your shoe size lets us help you find the best shoes you can buy right now.

Shoe size

ASICS GT-2000 5

Overall Grades And Reviews

8.8 Overall Grade
8 reviews

How This Shoe Compares To Its Competitors

Note: None of our partners have this shoe for sale.
Overall Rating among all shoes reviewed by LetsRun.com readers:

LetsRun.com Reviewer Ratings

Shoe Comparison

Shoe comparison
ASICS GT-2000 5
ASICS GT 2000 12
HOKA ONE ONE Tecton X 2
Nike Ultrafly Trail
Image
ASICS GT-2000 5
This Shoe
ASICS GT 2000 12
Newer Version
HOKA ONE ONE Tecton X 2
Top Rated Trail Shoe For Sale
Nike Ultrafly Trail
Next Most Comfortable Trail Shoe For Sale (after this shoe)
Shoe Properties
Shoe Type
Trail
Trainer
Trail
Trail
Pronation Control
Stability
Moderate Stability
Neutral
Weight
11 oz. (men's), 9.8 oz. (women's)
9.5 oz. (men's), 8.3 oz. (women's)
8.8 oz. (men's), 7.4 oz. (women's)
10.6 oz. (men's), 8.8 oz. (women's)
Stack Height
35mm.
38mm.
38mm.
Forefoot Height
27mm.
33mm.
30mm.
Drop Height
10 mm.
8 mm.
5 mm.
8 mm.
Upper material
Matryx Material
Shoe Released
Q1 2017
Q3 2023
Q2 2023
Q3 2023
MSRP
$120
$138
$225
LRC Ratings
Out of 10
Overall
8.8
8.7
9.1
8.9
Comfort
9.0
8.8
8.7
8.9
Cushioning
9.1
8.3
8.9
8.7
Durability
8.4
8.1
8.6
8.3
Appearance
8.5
8.1
8.7
8.5
Value
8.4
8.1
8.4
7.6

Reader Reviews

  • Great shoe

    15 miles per week, neutral pronator, low arches
    Overall
    10.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    10.0
    Durability
    10.0
    Appearance
    10.0
    Value
    9.0

    Comfortable and durable.

  • GT 2000-5 Lite Show

    20 miles per week, overpronator, low arches
    Overall
    8.0
    Comfort
    8.0
    Cushioning
    9.0
    Durability
    7.0
    Appearance
    9.0
    Value
    8.0

    This shoe is excellent for the light, the heavy, the fast, the slow, the serious, or the casual runner. The Lite Show version in particular is fantastic for night running after a long day of work. With great pronation control and excellent cushioning, I feel like it's saving my knees, being a heavier runner (195lbs). My only issue is that the toe box is slimmer than the original GT-2000 5 series. The entire GT-2000 5 series has durability issues where the heal enters the shoe - it's almost like the dog was chewing on it, but it's not the dog!

  • Great all around shoe

    50 miles per week, overpronator
    Overall
    10.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    10.0
    Durability
    10.0
    Appearance
    10.0
    Value
    9.0

    Great for everyday training. One pair lasts me hundreds of miles

  • Asics fan

    25 miles per week, overpronator, high arches
    Overall
    10.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    10.0
    Durability
    10.0
    Appearance
    10.0
    Value
    10.0

    Been running in them for 15yrs

  • AS 2 4

    20 miles per week, overpronator, medium arches
    Overall
    9.0
    Comfort
    9.0
    Cushioning
    9.0
    Durability
    9.0
    Appearance
    8.0
    Value
    7.0

    this series has been up and down a lot over the last 6 years. from a 1 star to 9 stars.

  • Asics GT-2000 5 Review

    45 miles per week, overpronator, medium arches
    Overall
    8.0
    Comfort
    9.0
    Cushioning
    8.0
    Durability
    7.0
    Appearance
    7.0
    Value
    8.0

    As a 51 year old runner in the Houston area, there are several months out of the year here that are extremely tough on shoes. Couple that with being a fairly heavy sweater and the strain on running shoe durability is pushed. As an every day trainer for the road, this shoe holds up reasonably well. I am a mild pronator with a midfoot strike. I have always run in the Asics GT series, going back to the 21xx series before that over the past couple of decades. I have no injury or biomechanical issues that I would attribute to the shoes. They are adequately cushioned, but not overly so. The tongue is also not excessively padded and holds its place very well. Previous models would start to see some wear through the upper in the big toe area, but with four different pair of the 5s, I have not seen this at all. The color schemes are okay for me; I don't get too wrapped up in aesthetics, though they did seem to trend towards darker colors in this model. Compared to the newly arriving model 6s, which look horrendous to me, I appreciate the mix that you can find on most of the model 5s.

    I rotate through three pair in the summer as I will pretty much sweatlog a shoe in any run here longer than 30-40 minutes. Weekly mileage is 40-50 miles. I typically put on about 400 miles per pair. One thing I have noticed with the model 5s is some premature outer sole wear in the ball of the foot at around 300-350 miles. I have not noticed this in previous models. The sock liner wears pretty well considering how much sweat they take in and the strain placed on them. I remove the insoles after each run (year 'round) to allow both them and the shoes to completely air out and decompress. I have never used an off-the-shelf insole and the stock version seems to hold up well. They do tend to swell over time, probably from accumulation of salts from absorbing sweat. I literally will ring them out after most of my summer runs here, but there's only so much one can do.

    I think the value for these shoes is excellent and runners younger than myself, and in less harsh climates, could extract more mileage out of these. Just keep an eye on the outer sole though. I will admit that I do not purchase these from a local running store, mainly because I've run in these models for so long, there's no need to mess with that. So the value is further increased through online purchase, though I always advocate people, especially new runners, visiting their LRS.

  • Old Standby

    50 miles per week, neutral pronator, medium arches
    Overall
    10.0
    Comfort
    10.0
    Cushioning
    10.0
    Durability
    8.0
    Appearance
    9.0
    Value
    9.0

    I haven't worn a different brand of running shoe in 30 years nor do I plan to. This model had a rough spot for a couple around the 2000-2, but really like this one. Although my last two pairs have torn on the inside by the achilles. Seems odd. Kept running on them and seemed fine.

  • ASICS GT-2000 5 Review

    20 miles per week, neutral pronator, low arches
    Overall
    7.0
    Comfort
    9.0
    Durability
    10.0
    Appearance
    5.0
    Value
    10.0

    Comfy, but ugly imo.