"A UK Athletics review into doping claims against Mo Farah's coach Alberto Salazar has found no evidence of wrongdoing by Britain's double Olympic champion."
"A UK Athletics review into doping claims against Mo Farah's coach Alberto Salazar has found no evidence of wrongdoing by Britain's double Olympic champion."
FROM YOU'RE LINK:
The governing body also said that, because of a subsequent launch of a formal investigation by US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) and UK Anti-Doping (UKAD), the findings from their review would be shared with UKAD "prior to any wider circulation".
Let's summarize: 1. UK Athletics found no evidence of wrongdoing, and turned their report over to UK Anti-Doping (UKAD), who is currently conducting its own investigation of Farah.2. USADA is conducting its own investigation of Salazar and Rupp.Simple as that. I suspect that UKAD will report similar findings as UK Athletics. And I also suspect that USADA will find no evidence of wrongdoing.
Her U Go v2 wrote:
FROM YOU'RE LINK:
The governing body also said that, because of a subsequent launch of a formal investigation by US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) and UK Anti-Doping (UKAD), the findings from their review would be shared with UKAD "prior to any wider circulation".
I expect that UK Athletics chose to not find anything wrong. They don't do drug testing. Much like ostriches, they have their heads in the sand.
Rong Doings wrote:
They don't do drug testing.
Wrong! They do test. But it's on a completely voluntary basis.
UK Athletics let Mo train with a banned doper without even a slap on the wrist.
In that article UKA has nothing to say about Salazar or the NOP which seems odd. When UKA finds "no evidence of impropriety" are they speaking narrowly only about Farah? Can they really conclude that Farah did nothing improper without looking into his club and coach?
Imagine that, UK Athletics, who recently signed a deal with Nike found no "impropriety" in Mo's relationship with NOP.
Rong Doings wrote:
I expect that UKblatant ics chose to not find anything wrong. They don't do drug testing. Much like ostriches, they have their heads in the sand.
1 . he knows the time he gets tested and chose not to answer the door
2 . he's evading ooc testing in East Africa
Most blatant doper ever
bad_stats wrote:
In that article UKA has nothing to say about Salazar or the NOP which seems odd. When UKA finds "no evidence of impropriety" are they speaking narrowly only about Farah?
They are likely covering their arses by not finding anything that occurred with the UK proper. NOP is not located in the UK, and the Mobot trains in Africa most of the year. Mo is rarely in the UK so nothing is likely going on on the isle.
This sport is doomed, why would I like MO or Rupp or any other athlete who doesn't get busted because of favoritism. No wonder other athletes that do come out positive dislike the fact that they are labeled as cheats and others like Farah get to do it completely legal! World is crooked!
Coach.. wrote:
Rong Doings wrote:I expect that UKblatant ics chose to not find anything wrong. They don't do drug testing. Much like ostriches, they have their heads in the sand.
1 . he knows the time he gets tested and chose not to answer the door
2 . he's evading ooc testing in East Africa
Most blatant doper ever
you're retarded
And now this has been confirmed by the newly leaked data:"However, Mo Farah recorded no abnormal tests. The British double Olympic champion has been forced to insist on his innocence after his coach Alberto Salazar was recently the subject of doping allegations in a Panorama documentary. The American has strenuously denied all of the allegations against him.The findings in this latest programme were analysed by two of the world’s leading experts in blood doping, Michael Ashenden and Robin Parisotto."
Here you go wrote:
"A UK Athletics review into doping claims against Mo Farah's coach Alberto Salazar has found no evidence of wrongdoing by Britain's double Olympic champion."
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/athletics/33723197
Yes, that was very interesting.
The doping Salazar is being accused of is nothing compared to the blood doping and EPO use this new report is detailing.
And given the lack of activity on this thread, no one wants to hear that Mo is clean.
Karma Police wrote:
Yes, that was very interesting.
The doping Salazar is being accused of is nothing compared to the blood doping and EPO use this new report is detailing.
Karma Police wrote:
The doping Salazar is being accused of is nothing compared to the blood doping and EPO use this new report is detailing.
He's accused of giving testosterone to a 16 year old you moran.
Bad Wigins wrote:
Karma Police wrote:The doping Salazar is being accused of is nothing compared to the blood doping and EPO use this new report is detailing.
He's accused of giving testosterone to a 16 year old you moran.
Something that no rational human being would believe. That he told the dr. he was cheating, and was only cheating on testosterone, otherwise he would have said more since he was already admitting cheating, but if you're cheating why stop at testosterone? Such poor logic.
It's clear as day he was talking about the legal supplement which we know he was taking. Why would he only tell the Dr. about something that could get him in trouble but not testoboost which wouldn't?? Seriously you have to be trying to find something that isn't there to not see the flawed logic...