This is easy to figure out.
1. Tenant like to drink beer.
2. Tenant observes bartender taking money from him. Sees lots money in cash machine. With that information, comes to the conclusion that it is better to own a bar then drink at a bar.
3. Tenant decides to start a bar, but doesn't know how and doesn't have any money.
4. Tenant finds desperate landlord with empty church, so desperate that he even willing to finance the lease security deposit in monthly installments.
5. Tenant does bar build-out off-permit, no doubt with the implicit knowledge of landlord.
6. (no idea if tenant had money to purchase inventory)
7. Tenant opens bar. Doesn't make money. Doesn't make any lease payments to landlord.
8. WTF moment for desperate landlord. Not only is he short income, he also does not have the ability to show the building to other prospective tenants.
9. Landlord files suit, knowing full well that tenant has no money to satisfy judgement, which would take months even years for eviction. Landlord switches strategy and uses the tenants illegal build-out to justify an immediate remedy, which includes eviction and possession of assets and fixtures.
10. Tenant is fvcked now. Desperate for cash he breaks into locked bar, removes taps and sell them on Craigslist. Not a good move. Situation has now escalated from merely Fvcked, to Fvcked Level 2.
11. Tenant still likes to drink beer, only won't have any more hair-brained ideas of opening another bar in the immediate future..... that is, until he can find another desperate landlord with a vacant property. If so, repeat steps 1 through 11.