Thinking about getting the 220 instead. Have used the 610 and wasn't a big fan of the touchscreen. The features of the 620 just are not that much greater to justify the additional 150 dollars or nearly 200 dollars if you opt for the heart rate monitor. Is anyone else going between the two? I've already read dc rainmaker website. Very hard to decide, help!
I picked up the 220 at the NYC expo. I am coming from a 110 but like it a lot so far. It picks up satellites much faster. Other than that I haven't had a chance to use many of the other features. I am interested to see how it works on the treadmill.
GOrilla Boy wrote:
I picked up the 220 at the NYC expo. I am coming from a 110 but like it a lot so far. It picks up satellites much faster. Other than that I haven't had a chance to use many of the other features. I am interested to see how it works on the treadmill.
Does the 220 display current position (lat,long co-ordinates)?
pdxrunner3000 wrote:
GOrilla Boy wrote:I picked up the 220 at the NYC expo. I am coming from a 110 but like it a lot so far. It picks up satellites much faster. Other than that I haven't had a chance to use many of the other features. I am interested to see how it works on the treadmill.
Does the 220 display current position (lat,long co-ordinates)?
No it does not. Why would you need this for running?