On my long run today I was trying to average out 6'40/mi, during the run the watch was displaying that I was at 6'40 or 6'42 pace, I ran my last mile in 6'10 and ended the run.. then it says average pace 6'51/mi
what gives?
On my long run today I was trying to average out 6'40/mi, during the run the watch was displaying that I was at 6'40 or 6'42 pace, I ran my last mile in 6'10 and ended the run.. then it says average pace 6'51/mi
what gives?
I had a similar problem. Went for a run and was only going to hit 7 flat. my watch said I was going 8:40 pace but i was clearly pushing it. I thought I was just really out of shape. turns out, when the mile split came up, I ran a 5:30 mile. I hate my watch (besides the aesthetic properties of it) and wish I bought a Garmin instead.
do you guys even lift?
Why do you wish you had a Garmin? Have you ever used a Garmin? How do you know they are any better?More importantly, why do people just automatically assume that Garmin has the best GPS watches?
youngcoach wrote:
I had a similar problem. Went for a run and was only going to hit 7 flat. my watch said I was going 8:40 pace but i was clearly pushing it. I thought I was just really out of shape. turns out, when the mile split came up, I ran a 5:30 mile. I hate my watch (besides the aesthetic properties of it) and wish I bought a Garmin instead.
I have used a garmin watch before. I love how you can access more information and how you can import the data to more applications than the nike+. Garmin also connects faster to GPS than my Nike stopwatch and can be used when I am doing cross training when swimming and biking. Over all, the garmin is just a better product but then again is more expensive on average.