No gun found in boat. Nice work Boston Police.

...oh yeah, I almost forgot, the police also said they exchanged gun fire with the suspect from the boat. So how do you exchange gun fire with someone who does not have a gun?

A not guilty verdict becomes a little more likely....

Link for any of these claims? I checked MSNBC, CNN, & Huffington post & saw no news of this. One article mentioned him having only 1 gun.

That wasn't the Boston Police.

is this it?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2314448/Now-officials-claim-Boston-bombing-suspect-NOT-armed-boat-showdown--despite-police-account-firefight-shooting-himself.html

two officials who talked to the associated press

I thought he had WMDs (since that's what they are calling the pressure cooker bombs) on him too. Where are the missing WMDs?

It seems to have been confirmed.

The suspect was unarmed in the boat.

The police "returned fire" on an unarmed 19 year old. And then claimed his wounds were self inflicted. Our heros

fullofit wrote:

So they fire twenty rounds into the boat and then try to say the gun wounds to his neck and head were self-inflicted. Now investigators reveal that he never had a gun in the boat. Come on guys, this is pathetic. It's no wonder people don't trust cops.

Did you come up with that on your own? Like the time in frosh English when you raised your hand, answered a question, and the teacher praised you for finally coming up with an original thought even though the answer was completely wrong and the girl sitting next to you that you thought you had a chance with just gave you the Man, How Did That Retarded Guy Get Into College look. If this rings and bell, I apologize in advance.

thought the whole self-inlicted gunshot wound claim sounded kind of fishy. Who shoots themselves in the neck?

OK Mr. Super man... next time the police get in a shoot out(yes this Dirichlet did shoot at police)perhaps you should volunteer to go in their place.

for real wrote:

Did you come up with that on your own? Like the time in frosh English when you raised your hand, answered a question, and the teacher praised you for finally coming up with an original thought even though the answer was completely wrong and the girl sitting next to you that you thought you had a chance with just gave you the Man, How Did That Retarded Guy Get Into College look. If this rings and bell, I apologize in advance.

You can't tell the story, then apologize "in advance". You're this retarded guy, aren't you?

No problem with the actions of the PD. The guy had plenty of chances to surrender. He was last seen in a shootout where a bomb or bombs were discarded. He killed and maimed over a period of a few days including the assassination of a police officer. It's a wonder he survived. I feel worse for the boat owner.

There is no link what so ever to the bombers and the MIT cop. None.

But he had a gun in the earlier shootout.

He was bleeding for a day before he got to the boat.

Do we need a 5K to benefit the boat now?

Say what now?

nolink wrote:

There is no link what so ever to the bombers and the MIT cop. None.

From the NY Times: “Over the course of the next hour or so we exchanged gunfire with the suspect, who was inside the boat, and ultimately the hostage rescue team of the F.B.I. made an entry into the boat and removed the suspect, who was still alive,” Mr. Davis said. He said the suspect was in “serious condition” and had apparently been wounded in the gunfight that left his brother dead.

Yeah, that earlier gunfight would explain the wounds.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/04/23/article-2313429-1972D34E000005DC-114_634x397.jpg

nolink wrote:

There is no link what so ever to the bombers and the MIT cop. None.

Not true. Both brothers in separate vehicles got out and charged the MIT officer and assassinated him.

So the homeowner sees blood on the boat and magically finds some one in it, some one who they were looking for?

And he's innocent? He's not part of a shootout with police?