Muslim Terrorist KILLS his brother according to police chief

Wow. So the cops were actually in the process of cuffing and arresting the older brother when the younger brother ran him over.

Yes that's right. It wasn't the police who killed the guy, it was his brother. The police were very nice and didn't hurt him at all.

To be clear it was in their best interest to catch him alive so they could gather intelligence. So it does add up. Same reason they didn't just kill the younger one when he was in the boat.

This will give him an extra point when he meets Saint Peter at the Pearly Gates.

He could even have killed him intentionally. In bad movies, it happens that bandits agree upon killing each other instead of being caught by the police.

Wait, so you're saying that the cops didn't get either one of these guys? One was smoked by his brother and the other was found by a citizen?

Wasn't the older brother wearing a suicide vest? Maybe the younger one wanted to stop the carnage so he ran him over to prevent him from setting off the explosions and killing more people.

I don't know about that. From his death photo, he was riddled with bullets. He also had a huge gash on the side of his chest. That doesn't look like it came from a tire. I also didn't see any abrasions like you would see from someone being dragged down the street by a car fleeing the scene.

The Guru Matt James wrote:

Wasn't the older brother wearing a suicide vest? Maybe the younger one wanted to stop the carnage so he ran him over to prevent him from setting off the explosions and killing more people.

Yes, that is very probable. It's also likely that he only joined in this "terrorist act" so that he could prevent the much worse deeds his brother was about to do.

We must do our best to understand this kid who was alienated by America. We simply have to take the log out of our own eyes first.

That is a lie.

I know someone in the medical field who saw the body and it was ripped to pieces from dozens of bullets

Idunmojoe wrote:

I don't know about that. From his death photo, he was riddled with bullets. He also had a huge gash on the side of his chest. That doesn't look like it came from a tire. I also didn't see any abrasions like you would see from someone being dragged down the street by a car fleeing the scene.

So what they'll say here is yes he was shot but not fatally. The cause of death was the car, no abraisions or not. Good question where that gash came from though. That body is quite a site.

Haha.Also, With all the gun shots that were heard in that video, are you trying to tell me the older brother was still relatively ok? Maybe the shooting accuracy in movies like James Bond is closer to reality than we think...

Ordon wrote:

Wait, so you're saying that the cops didn't get either one of these guys? One was smoked by his brother and the other was found by a citizen?

The Guru Matt James wrote:

Wasn't the older brother wearing a suicide vest? Maybe the younger one wanted to stop the carnage so he ran him over to prevent him from setting off the explosions and killing more people.

You're right. It is very typical for a person who has just planned and executed a deadly attack to suddenly take action to prevent violence, only to go back to setting off bombs and shooting people immediately afterward. He had what we in the profiling business call a "Darth Vader moment." He suddenly realized the err of his ways and turned, metaphorically speaking, from imperial lord to Jedi. Unfortunately, he regressed shortly thereafter and resumed shooting at cops and setting off bombs. But yes, he almost certainly ran over his brother out of the goodness of his heart.

Ohsure wrote: Good question where that gash came from though. That body is quite a site.

The gash was rugged and crude. Consistent with a being caused by metal under the car.

Take a look under your own car. Mine has several nasty metal parts that would absolutely hurt someone if they were run over.

The Guru Matt James wrote:

Wasn't the older brother wearing a suicide vest? Maybe the younger one wanted to stop the carnage so he ran him over to prevent him from setting off the explosions and killing more people.

Aren't you the guy from the other thread who doesn't believe in free will? If he doesn't have free will (as you have claimed), how could he act on his own desires as you describe?

Gashered by Car wrote:

Ohsure wrote: Good question where that gash came from though. That body is quite a site.

The gash was rugged and crude. Consistent with a being caused by metal under the car.

Take a look under your own car. Mine has several nasty metal parts that would absolutely hurt someone if they were run over.

Sure, if his body kind of rolled as the car went over him and one of those sharp areas right under your doors on either side stretching down the length of the Chasis caught his side as he rolled I could see that happening. Good point.

B Real9 wrote:

That is a lie.

I know someone in the medical field who saw the body and it was ripped to pieces from dozens of bullets

Cops never lie.

The trauma surgeon who operated on the older brother said in a press interview (televised/on line) they opened him up. That's what that "gash" is on the side of his body. Has nothing whatsoever to do with "metal under a car."

Gashered by Car wrote:

The gash was rugged and crude. Consistent with a being caused by metal under the car.

Wow. You sounds so knowledgeable. And are so wrong.

Emergency thorocotomy incision.