Yeah. AVOID! Even the Saucony website's fan reviews highlight terrible durabilty, or lack of. My Saucony Outlaw uppers failed after 50 miles! The soles on the Kinvara 2 were bad too. According to their fans even, the '2' would only last, "200-250 miles"! When you consider they corruptly banned my truthful Outlaw review, due to being "against their guidelines" (lies!), you can imagine the other secret horror stories.
At $100 they are a con. In England they are £95 = $150! For a shoe which only lasts 6 months!? The Kinvara 3 (still 7.7oz in a size US9) has actually REMOVED a layer from the cloth upper and replaced it with sticky tape! LOL!
They're too floppy to spring off the toe for me, a la Pistorius's artificial leg springs. A cheaper, better lasting, faster, lighter, prettier option is the Adidas AdiZero range.
I went with the lightest (6.7oz in a size US9.5), spring-loaded, AdiZero 'Feather' (NOT the tennis version, the Adidas idiots used the same name!), for £50. But the Feather 2 is now out, but without the bargain price (Avoid the identical 'Rush' model - it has the toe protector layer tapering up into a point right where the toes bend and will probably cause the material to fail and tear!).
Similar, but less extreme, is the AdiZero 'Adios' (7.4oz US9, and Marathon World Record holder) or Adios 2 (7.8oz, but with increased stiffness, but still not as stiff/springloaded as the 'Feather'). If Available, the 'Hagio' is like the Adios too, perhaps a bit lighter (check the runblogger's review:
http://www.runblogger.com/2011/12/adidas-adizero-hagio-running-shoe.html
). I wouldn't bother with the AdiZero 'Boston' or 'F50' runners, unless you're really fat and heavy, or do many many miles, because they're both over 9oz and, therefore, a bit 'heavy'.
If you're on a budget, the Adidas Climacool 'Chili' is a light shoe (8.5oz?), yet looks quite robust, but is very pretty too!