stabilizeme wrote:
Anyways, I would prefer a shoe that isn't super heavy, and will get good mileage life.
Hard thing is that all the reviews I read of these shoes sounds the same: "Nice flexibility, great cushioning, good post, etc."
I'd like to be able to use the shoe for long runs (about 10 miles), tempo runs, and everything in between. Would one stability shoe be fine for all my different kind of runs?
The reviews all read the same because they are all very similar shoes. They were designed to fit relatively similar feet, have similar amounts of cushion and stability. One would expect them to be very similar. Quick raction to your list:
Adrenaline 11- Softer than prior Adrenalines, medium weight, medium to roomy fit, fairly smooth heel-toe transition. This is the most stable shoe you mentioned
Asics 2160: Very similar to prior models. Softer than Adrenaline, a little heavier, and much less flexible. Medium fit, awkward ride for non heelstrikers IMO.
Nike Structure Triax: Similar weight to Adrenaline, much softer. Snugger fit, especially in the midfoot/arch. Much more flexible forefoot. Stability is between 2160 and Adrenaline.
Saucony Progrid is a cushioning system, not a shoe, its like saying "Nike Air" or "Asics Gel". I'm going to guess you meant to Progrid Guide. Roomy toebox, pretty soft, moderately flexible. Fits kinda like the 2160 except the toebox.
All the being said, I don't think this is the kind of shoe you want. It sounds like you're looking for more of a lightweight, light stability trainer. Light and flexible enough for faster paced running, but more substantial than a racing flat, with a little bit of stability. Asics DS trainer, Mizuno Elixir, Brooks Ravenna, New Balance 905, Adidas Tempo. Have a look, and then find somewhere to try them on. Its always best to let your feet decide what they like.