She negative split 15:54! Two seconds slower than her 5k PR?
I say high 15:30s
She negative split 15:54! Two seconds slower than her 5k PR?
I say high 15:30s
FASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSST!
She is hot.
Thanks for the link to the interview. Interesting.
Also somewhat interesting, I suppose: that anyone would characterize the woman as "hot." I understand that she's a nice person and a hard worker--in the classroom and on the track--and I respect that highly.
But "hot"? Please tell me you were joking.
Actually, the more I think about it, the surer I am that you *were* joking. Ya got me. Well played.
she's extremely cute. i dunno about hot... i dig cute girls over hot girls though so it works for me.
the ages wrote:
she's extremely cute. i dunno about hot... i dig cute girls over hot girls though so it works for me.
Totally agree. I associate the word "hot" as a "a slutty looking female that if not for her looks I would have zero respect for her."
So therefore I wouldn't use "hot" to describe her.
seems to have a fun personality and comes off as pretty intelligent in her interviews, too. so cute, fun, and smart. kiel uhl, you lucky bastard.