Steve Scott was the worst with testosterone. It was really bad. He ran a lot of sub 4min miles but paid the price later in life
full stop. how can you say this? there are hordes of men out there on trt, and the incidence of testicular cancer in the US has remained nearly the same at 5.9-6.3 men per 100k. armstrong had embryonal carcinoma, which to my knowledge, has no relation to exogenous testosterone levels. in fact, studies have shown no affect or been unequivocal. i don't know the type that scott had, but given that 40% of testicular cancer is nonseminomatous, the odds are that he also would also not be affected by exogenous trt.
Steve Scott was the worst with testosterone. It was really bad. He ran a lot of sub 4min miles but paid the price later in life
full stop. how can you say this? there are hordes of men out there on trt, and the incidence of testicular cancer in the US has remained nearly the same at 5.9-6.3 men per 100k. armstrong had embryonal carcinoma, which to my knowledge, has no relation to exogenous testosterone levels. in fact, studies have shown no affect or been unequivocal. i don't know the type that scott had, but given that 40% of testicular cancer is nonseminomatous, the odds are that he also would also not be affected by exogenous trt.
Steve Scott was one of the dirtiest runners in the 80’s
full stop. how can you say this? there are hordes of men out there on trt, and the incidence of testicular cancer in the US has remained nearly the same at 5.9-6.3 men per 100k. armstrong had embryonal carcinoma, which to my knowledge, has no relation to exogenous testosterone levels. in fact, studies have shown no affect or been unequivocal. i don't know the type that scott had, but given that 40% of testicular cancer is nonseminomatous, the odds are that he also would also not be affected by exogenous trt.
Steve Scott was one of the dirtiest runners in the 80’s
that might be, but testosterone didn't cause his testicular cancer, as what was inferred also above with armstrong.
Steve Scott was the worst with testosterone. It was really bad. He ran a lot of sub 4min miles but paid the price later in life
full stop. how can you say this? there are hordes of men out there on trt, and the incidence of testicular cancer in the US has remained nearly the same at 5.9-6.3 men per 100k. armstrong had embryonal carcinoma, which to my knowledge, has no relation to exogenous testosterone levels. in fact, studies have shown no affect or been unequivocal. i don't know the type that scott had, but given that 40% of testicular cancer is nonseminomatous, the odds are that he also would also not be affected by exogenous trt.
Thank you for speaking reasonably. It’s enough to dislike athletes, who take drugs. No need to make medical connections that aren’t there.
full stop. how can you say this? there are hordes of men out there on trt, and the incidence of testicular cancer in the US has remained nearly the same at 5.9-6.3 men per 100k. armstrong had embryonal carcinoma, which to my knowledge, has no relation to exogenous testosterone levels. in fact, studies have shown no affect or been unequivocal. i don't know the type that scott had, but given that 40% of testicular cancer is nonseminomatous, the odds are that he also would also not be affected by exogenous trt.
Thank you for speaking reasonably. It’s enough to dislike athletes, who take drugs. No need to make medical connections that aren’t there.
thank you for saying that. as someone that deals with this subject daily, it bothers me to see false information propagated as fact.
How do you get cancer from that? I thought TU are proscribed for some older men for medical reasons.
Prostate cancer risk is increased with aging men because of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) not testosterone.
It originates from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) which affects about 50% of men over 50, with the percentages going up from there.
That why the clinical treatment for BPH are 5 Alpha Reductase inhibitors (e.g. finasteride & dutasteride) that block the conversion of testosterone to DHT.
thank you for saying that. as someone that deals with this subject daily, it bothers me to see false information propagated as fact.
Out of curiosity, how do you deal with this subject daily?
I work as a psychologist with families with recent cancer diagnoses. Basically, everything from acute diagnosis to long term therapy to grievance counseling.
We've updated our BetterRunningShoes.com web site to make it easier to find good deals on the best shoes. To keep it great we need new shoe reviews from you.