Because they are cute... for actual running the design seems gimmicky, does that come at the expense of its functionality as a good running shoe? Any feedback from the letsrun masses on if they are any better or worse than other running shoes?
Because they are cute... for actual running the design seems gimmicky, does that come at the expense of its functionality as a good running shoe? Any feedback from the letsrun masses on if they are any better or worse than other running shoes?
On is a racist shoe
I have had the Cloudmonster and the Cloudflow 4. Great arch support and a firm ride. I don't like overly cushioned shoes so these hit the right spot for me.
Assuming she's 18 or older, can we see a picture of her feet, both with and without the shoes?
Her foot chassis has great shape and cute, short length. But her dogs are downright disgusting 😏
MalikShabazz wrote:
On is a racist shoe
Malik, put down the bottle of Jameson and let's have a serious conversation.
i don't think they look good, but they sure are trendy. women love trends.
Leave her
On has been making a major push at the club level. I know guys who train in on who have run sub 1430 in on spikes and pretty good halfs and marathons in their ons, like 1:07 and 2:17
Blahbleheh wrote:
Because they are cute... for actual running the design seems gimmicky, does that come at the expense of its functionality as a good running shoe? Any feedback from the letsrun masses on if they are any better or worse than other running shoes?
Sounds like a keeper. Good taste tastes good.
MalikShabazz wrote:
On is a racist shoe
What?