This La Chaux-de-Fonds tack is so goosed. None of these times seem credible. 7 PBs from the 8 starters. 8th place got 10.11.
This La Chaux-de-Fonds tack is so goosed. None of these times seem credible. 7 PBs from the 8 starters. 8th place got 10.11.
Kaks wrote:
This La Chaux-de-Fonds tack is so goosed. None of these times seem credible. 7 PBs from the 8 starters. 8th place got 10.11.
Nah, its a legit track, just super fast. These athletes are legit but none of these times will be replicated.
Richardson got a 1.9 wind. Pretty much as perfect as you can get. Equals out perfectly to his previous SB of 10.08
mictlantecuhtli wrote:
Kaks wrote:
This La Chaux-de-Fonds tack is so goosed. None of these times seem credible. 7 PBs from the 8 starters. 8th place got 10.11.
Nah, its a legit track, just super fast. These athletes are legit but none of these times will be replicated.
Richardson got a 1.9 wind. Pretty much as perfect as you can get. Equals out perfectly to his previous SB of 10.08
So would one of the top Americans run low 9.6 at this meet?
mictlantecuhtli wrote:
Kaks wrote:
This La Chaux-de-Fonds tack is so goosed. None of these times seem credible. 7 PBs from the 8 starters. 8th place got 10.11.
Nah, its a legit track, just super fast. These athletes are legit but none of these times will be replicated.
Richardson got a 1.9 wind. Pretty much as perfect as you can get. Equals out perfectly to his previous SB of 10.08
It's at altitude. That plays a huge factor.
Roger Biebert wrote:
mictlantecuhtli wrote:
Nah, its a legit track, just super fast. These athletes are legit but none of these times will be replicated.
Richardson got a 1.9 wind. Pretty much as perfect as you can get. Equals out perfectly to his previous SB of 10.08
So would one of the top Americans run low 9.6 at this meet?
Yes.
Roger Biebert wrote:
mictlantecuhtli wrote:
Nah, its a legit track, just super fast. These athletes are legit but none of these times will be replicated.
Richardson got a 1.9 wind. Pretty much as perfect as you can get. Equals out perfectly to his previous SB of 10.08
So would one of the top Americans run low 9.6 at this meet?
In those same conditions? 100%. Thompson would have gone low 9.6s in these conditions. 9.77 on that Kingston track running the way he did is impressive.
Kaks wrote:
This La Chaux-de-Fonds tack is so goosed. None of these times seem credible. 7 PBs from the 8 starters. 8th place got 10.11.
A 9.97 basic time without the wind and altitude.
MadsMartel wrote:
Kaks wrote:
This La Chaux-de-Fonds tack is so goosed. None of these times seem credible. 7 PBs from the 8 starters. 8th place got 10.11.
A 9.97 basic time without the wind and altitude.
He did not break 20 in his follow up race at lower altitude 2 days later. In that race he ran 20.51. Make of that what you will.