According to the Supreme Court the President can do whatever he wants. He suggests he gets rid of the Supreme Court and throws Trump in prison where he belongs.
While the Supreme Court was established by Article III of the U.S. Constitution, the size, structure and functioning of the Court was left to Congress to outline in a series of Judiciary Acts. Throughout U.S. history, there have been seven changes to the number of justices sitting on the Supreme Court, the last of which settled at nine justices in 1869 to reflect the nine circuit courts at the time. (There are now thirteen federal circuit courts.)
Remember when the Republicans ran against Biden in 2020, claiming he was going to "expand and pack the court" if he won and the Dems had the House and Senate? Well, the Dems didn't do that. They also didn't make Puerto Rico and Guam states, nor did they award Senators to D.C.
Funny how the Republicans scare the populace with things the Dems won't do (Death Panels, "kill your grandma" and "round up all the guns and take them away"), while failing to actually do the things they claim they WILL do themselves (build a wall that Mexico will pay for, "Repeal and Replace Obamacare").
Funny how the Republicans scare the populace with things the Dems won't do (Death Panels, "kill your grandma" and "round up all the guns and take them away"), while failing to actually do the things they claim they WILL do themselves (build a wall that Mexico will pay for, "Repeal and Replace Obamacare").
According to the Supreme Court the President can do whatever he wants. He suggests he gets rid of the Supreme Court and throws Trump in prison where he belongs.
Liberals in spring 2024: we must respect the judicial process
Liberals today: we need to impeach the Supreme Court, burn the system down
Remember when the Republicans ran against Biden in 2020, claiming he was going to "expand and pack the court" if he won and the Dems had the House and Senate? Well, the Dems didn't do that. They also didn't make Puerto Rico and Guam states, nor did they award Senators to D.C.
They have tried to do everything listed here it's just been blocked by the gop thankfully.
While the Supreme Court was established by Article III of the U.S. Constitution, the size, structure and functioning of the Court was left to Congress to outline in a series of Judiciary Acts. Throughout U.S. history, there have been seven changes to the number of justices sitting on the Supreme Court, the last of which settled at nine justices in 1869 to reflect the nine circuit courts at the time. (There are now thirteen federal circuit courts.)
Remember when the Republicans ran against Biden in 2020, claiming he was going to "expand and pack the court" if he won and the Dems had the House and Senate? Well, the Dems didn't do that. They also didn't make Puerto Rico and Guam states, nor did they award Senators to D.C.
Funny how the Republicans scare the populace with things the Dems won't do (Death Panels, "kill your grandma" and "round up all the guns and take them away"), while failing to actually do the things they claim they WILL do themselves (build a wall that Mexico will pay for, "Repeal and Replace Obamacare").
How magnanimous of Democrats to not do something they couldn't do because they didn't have 60 votes in the Senate...
According to the Supreme Court the President can do whatever he wants. He suggests he gets rid of the Supreme Court and throws Trump in prison where he belongs.
Exactly! Dark Brandon should just go full "The Pelican Brief" and have all six conservative judges offed by official Presidential order. He's got the power and he may as well use it. Thanks, SCOTUS!
The size of the court can be changed by legislation. If Dems gained control of congress, they absolutely should pack the court with partisans who are dedicated to reversing Dobbs, Citizens United, Loper Bright (Chevron overruled), etc. The Roberts court has killed stare decisis and made the court a purely political body. The conservative majority has snapped their fingers and overturned decades of well settled US Supreme Court precedent on the Chevron Doctrine, the right of privacy (abortion) and so on. The court has made up new doctrines like the "major question" doctrine and finding that spending money is speech. States are intentionally passing laws that are clearly unconstitutional under US Supreme Court precedent to put religion in schools in order to send a case to the US Supreme Court to shred separation of church and state. Worse still, Justice Thomas has a very warped interpretation of the commerce clause that if implemented could effectively relegate congress to only having the authority to regulate the sale of goods and services between citizens of different states which would wipe out agencies like the FAA, EPA, FLRA, etc.
Also, the US Supreme Court has become a star chamber that only takes hot button issues that have a huge impact on society and regularly ignores splits in the circuit courts over major legal issues that just aren't newsworthy (or part of the right wing agenda). The court should be expanded to 25 justices and allow for rulings by a panel of 3 with the option for en banc like the circuit courts. That would vastly increase the amount of appeals the court would be able to handle and clear up a host of circuit splits that have existed for several decades.
According to the Supreme Court the President can do whatever he wants. He suggests he gets rid of the Supreme Court and throws Trump in prison where he belongs.
Exactly! Dark Brandon should just go full "The Pelican Brief" and have all six conservative judges offed by official Presidential order. He's got the power and he may as well use it. Thanks, SCOTUS!
Oh look another Democrat who's too stupid to understand the SCOTUS decision...
It's a real bummer when your hivemind brain is tiny.
The size of the court can be changed by legislation. If Dems gained control of congress, they absolutely should pack the court with partisans who are dedicated to reversing Dobbs, Citizens United, Loper Bright (Chevron overruled), etc. The Roberts court has killed stare decisis and made the court a purely political body. The conservative majority has snapped their fingers and overturned decades of well settled US Supreme Court precedent on the Chevron Doctrine, the right of privacy (abortion) and so on. The court has made up new doctrines like the "major question" doctrine and finding that spending money is speech. States are intentionally passing laws that are clearly unconstitutional under US Supreme Court precedent to put religion in schools in order to send a case to the US Supreme Court to shred separation of church and state. Worse still, Justice Thomas has a very warped interpretation of the commerce clause that if implemented could effectively relegate congress to only having the authority to regulate the sale of goods and services between citizens of different states which would wipe out agencies like the FAA, EPA, FLRA, etc.
Also, the US Supreme Court has become a star chamber that only takes hot button issues that have a huge impact on society and regularly ignores splits in the circuit courts over major legal issues that just aren't newsworthy (or part of the right wing agenda). The court should be expanded to 25 justices and allow for rulings by a panel of 3 with the option for en banc like the circuit courts. That would vastly increase the amount of appeals the court would be able to handle and clear up a host of circuit splits that have existed for several decades.
Your post reminds me of my baby crying until he got his pacifier.
The size of the court can be changed by legislation. If Dems gained control of congress, they absolutely should pack the court with partisans who are dedicated to reversing Dobbs, Citizens United, Loper Bright (Chevron overruled), etc. The Roberts court has killed stare decisis and made the court a purely political body. The conservative majority has snapped their fingers and overturned decades of well settled US Supreme Court precedent on the Chevron Doctrine, the right of privacy (abortion) and so on. The court has made up new doctrines like the "major question" doctrine and finding that spending money is speech. States are intentionally passing laws that are clearly unconstitutional under US Supreme Court precedent to put religion in schools in order to send a case to the US Supreme Court to shred separation of church and state. Worse still, Justice Thomas has a very warped interpretation of the commerce clause that if implemented could effectively relegate congress to only having the authority to regulate the sale of goods and services between citizens of different states which would wipe out agencies like the FAA, EPA, FLRA, etc.
Also, the US Supreme Court has become a star chamber that only takes hot button issues that have a huge impact on society and regularly ignores splits in the circuit courts over major legal issues that just aren't newsworthy (or part of the right wing agenda). The court should be expanded to 25 justices and allow for rulings by a panel of 3 with the option for en banc like the circuit courts. That would vastly increase the amount of appeals the court would be able to handle and clear up a host of circuit splits that have existed for several decades.
There is no universe where the left will get 60 senators.
The only reason you corrupt hacks are desperate to make DC and Puerto Rico states is because you have a hard enough time getting 51 votes in the Senate.
President Biden said himself he does NOT believe in packing the court as whoever won would just expand it again.
It does NOT matter anyway as Supreme court Justices are supposed to be APOLITICAL and they go by LAWS as dictated by the Constitution and not any Political beliefs, often they have to go against what they would like to do as it would be inconsitant with Laws of the Constitution.
President Biden said himself he does NOT believe in packing the court as whoever won would just expand it again.
It does NOT matter anyway as Supreme court Justices are supposed to be APOLITICAL and they go by LAWS as dictated by the Constitution and not any Political beliefs, often they have to go against what they would like to do as it would be inconsitant with Laws of the Constitution.
Which is exactly what SCOTUS is doing. it might surprise you but all they did is reaffirm the Constitution for ALL US Presidents. Nothing in the latest ruling was specific to Trump.