There's the real economy and the financial economy that the real one serves. An extremely wealthy and fat man, who makes money out of money, the things he does being a net negative for the society around him will likely win awards for libertarian independence.
On the other hand a man who lives with parents, is perhaps softer in spirit, but has a high degree of obligation to his family would be regarded as a loser and win loser awards. Perhaps he finds the dog eat dog world too much, but ultimately has a bond with family that is godly.
The former wins awards for destroying local communities and getting rich (US dream is based on being rich).
Many of the former types leave their parents and never speak to them like good independent modern people. Westerners regard people from other cultures who have multiple generations of people in the same house as loser peoples. These are very often bombed and regarded as savage and backward. Zulus for example, genocided for not doing what they were told. Likely had multiple generations living in same tent.
You can both be rich, lazy, utterly bad for society. But nobody who owns a yacht would ever be thought of as lazy or selfish.
Di(s)cus