Would the top woman run 10,000m under 28:30 if male pacers were allowed?

I'd say 28:36. Pacing gives you approx 1 sec per lap x25 laps or 25sec improvement. Record is 29:01 - .25 = 28:36. (Scientific American had an analysis of kipchoge's sub 2 hr marathon and determine optimal pacing provides 7 sec improvement per mile vs kipchoge's 4 sec per mile. Using "optimal" pacing, record could be 7x6.2 miles or 43sec improvement. IOW 28:18!). Sorry so technical :(

The 2 hour pacemakers included two behind him as well

1. Faith Kipyegon

2. Agnes Jebet Ng'etich

3. Immaculate Anyango

The above 3 women are capable of even dipping under 28:30....

Yeah. I think that is right. Throw those 3 in a race with Gidey, Hassan, Tsegay, and Assefa, in good weather, and with male pace makers going all the way. One of these 7 women runs between 28:05 to 28:33.

Absolutely, those women are 3:50.0 or faster type 1500 runners, (4:07.0-4:10.0 mile types), with that kind of "speed" they could run, with male pacers: 8:00, 13:40, 28:20, 1:01:30, 2:09:50 (or faster). We're seeing a running revolution among top tier women. If they believe they can do it they will.

It would be good if selected track races under W.A. could be mixed under a seeding system....as they do with road races.

That’s ridiculous. At those paces, they would be gapped by the pacers before the halfway point. Could you have run 8:40 in HS if you really believed you could?

The one second advantage - is this human pacing vs no pacing including lights or human pacing vs lights? Using lights only a human pacer isn't necessary to hit perfect splits, but they also don't provide ability to draft, rhythm and perhaps the psychological advantage running behind someone provides.

A comment on Kipchoge's 2 hour marathon pacing, those formations wouldn't be possible on a track, although I imagine there are some slightly less effective formations that could be used since paced athlete needs to stay close to the rail.

I believe the only ones who have proven that pacers could assist with a decent sub 30 track 10000m are the last three WR holders in the event. Ayana, Hassan and Gidey all set their records running totally alone for the last half of the race and dodging lapped runners. Their times could have been significantly lower if they had enjoyed a male pacer in the second half of the race. Running a road race in sub 29 with male pacers throughout, whilst remarkable, doesn’t translate to a sub 29 time with current restrictions.
facts are that sub 28.30 is possible physiologically but will never happen due to the inability of a female to pace another at the speed required. The closest thing I have seen to this is when Gidey inadvertently paced Kipyegon to the 5000m WR last year in Paris. Faith said herself that without Gidey up front she couldn’t have done it on that day. But the simple fact is that those females with the ability to pace another woman to a sub 29 minute 10k are themselves a small group of contenders for the record. - so certainly would not settle for the role of “pacer” - Gidey had this problem when she tried to wrest back her 5000m record in Berlin last year. Her team could not find a pacer within the top echelon of runners in Ethiopia so had to fall back on a training partner and Beatrice Chepkoech (who is actually a very good pacer but lacks the ability to take the pacing duties further than 3km in a record attempt)

Yes and Usain Bolt, with his kind of speed, could probably run a 1:40:30 marathon.

The top women won't need pacers to break 28:30. They'll do it the same way every other record is being broken.