Man sues several women for 75mill because they wrote bad dating reviews on him
-
94
-
#2
This post was removed.
-
#3
This post was removed.
-
130
-
make them pay wrote:
Is it several or 27? Get your facts straight.
71 -
make them pay wrote:
Douchy as this guy looks, he’s got a point. Real-world gossiping is one thing, but systematically maligning a man on a website where he doesn’t have a voice does seem unfair, but maybe this is the world going forward.
1216 -
bah. wrote:
Douchy as this guy looks, he’s got a point. Real-world gossiping is one thing, but systematically maligning a man on a website where he doesn’t have a voice does seem unfair, but maybe this is the world going forward.
"Malign" implies that they are making false statements about him. Why do you assume they are lying? Do you really think 30 women got together and agreed to sh*t on this guy for no reason?
243 -
Is it a smart move to turn a locally bad reputation into a national one? I have a feeling that this lawsuit is going to get tossed out and his name will come up in the ensuing Google searches that all women do when they meet a guy.
390 -
In order to win he'd have to show the women knowingly told lies. He also will need to show $27MM in damages. Dominion voting systems could show that certain people knowing lied, and caused them to lose actually money because of it. But if you have enough money and are willing to burn it, you can sue anyone.
101 -
Wah. wrote:
bah. wrote:
Douchy as this guy looks, he’s got a point. Real-world gossiping is one thing, but systematically maligning a man on a website where he doesn’t have a voice does seem unfair, but maybe this is the world going forward.
"Malign" implies that they are making false statements about him. Why do you assume they are lying? Do you really think 30 women got together and agreed to sh*t on this guy for no reason?
I have no trouble imagining that as a possibility. Partners typically have a rather warped view, especially so after a relationship ends. The accusations listed included stupid things like he ghosted a woman after they broke up, so he’s crazy. Give me a break.
414 -
Wah. wrote:
bah. wrote:
Douchy as this guy looks, he’s got a point. Real-world gossiping is one thing, but systematically maligning a man on a website where he doesn’t have a voice does seem unfair, but maybe this is the world going forward.
"Malign" implies that they are making false statements about him. Why do you assume they are lying? Do you really think 30 women got together and agreed to sh*t on this guy for no reason?
No it doesn't. Malign literally means to talk about someone in a spiteful or mean-spirited manner. it doesn't say or imply false statements, just that they are spiteful and critical.
71 -
bah. wrote:
Wah. wrote:
"Malign" implies that they are making false statements about him. Why do you assume they are lying? Do you really think 30 women got together and agreed to sh*t on this guy for no reason?
I have no trouble imagining that as a possibility. Partners typically have a rather warped view, especially so after a relationship ends. The accusations listed included stupid things like he ghosted a woman after they broke up, so he’s crazy. Give me a break.
Lol okay, you can pain this tool as a victim if you want but I’ll side with overwhelming consensus.
113 -
Good legal analysis in the link abov
50 -
Scarletlettered wrote:
bah. wrote:
I have no trouble imagining that as a possibility. Partners typically have a rather warped view, especially so after a relationship ends. The accusations listed included stupid things like he ghosted a woman after they broke up, so he’s crazy. Give me a break.
Lol okay, you can pain this tool as a victim if you want but I’ll side with overwhelming consensus.
I don’t care who you side with or even if he was in the greater wrong than the women. My original comment was about the process used to smear his reputation. It’s easy for mob mentality to go out of control.
Facebook will seek refuge behind Section 230, but there are other European governments that have proven to be more sympathetic to protection against online smear campaigns and “the right to be forgotten”, so his litigious stance isn’t unreasonable.
43 -
A clingy ghoster? How?
70 -
bah. wrote:
I don’t care who you side with or even if he was in the greater wrong than the women. My original comment was about the process used to smear his reputation. It’s easy for mob mentality to go out of control.
Facebook will seek refuge behind Section 230, but there are other European governments that have proven to be more sympathetic to protection against online smear campaigns and “the right to be forgotten”, so his litigious stance isn’t unreasonable.
The major “process being used to smear his reputation” at this point is his own lawsuit that has made national news of something that was previously confined to a closed online community.
20 -
bah. wrote:
I don’t care who you side with or even if he was in the greater wrong than the women. My original comment was about the process used to smear his reputation. It’s easy for mob mentality to go out of control.
Facebook will seek refuge behind Section 230, but there are other European governments that have proven to be more sympathetic to protection against online smear campaigns and “the right to be forgotten”, so his litigious stance isn’t unreasonable.
Did the bro ask Facebook to take the content down? Filing this suit, especially in Federal Court, was a terrible idea.
30 -
Wonder if this is the same Nikko D'Ambrosio who is currently being investigated for tax fraud.
00 -
So Johnny Depp sued Amber Heard for defamation and she filed a countersuit for the same claim. And they both won. If this doesn't get thrown out and a jury is involved, all bets are off.
We *probably* need a new set off laws for the digital age, but we won't have them until it passes.
00 -
Sometimes You Have to Let Stuff Go wrote:
Is it a smart move to turn a locally bad reputation into a national one? I have a feeling that this lawsuit is going to get tossed out and his name will come up in the ensuing Google searches that all women do when they meet a guy.
Jamin should use this ploy. His negative review count easily trumps this clown. Easily worth lawsuits of several billion.
20
