And the topic of her thesis is as inane as you'd expect
EXCLUSIVE: @RealChrisBrunet and I have obtained documentation demonstrating that Harvard President Claudine Gay plagiarized multiple sections of her Ph.D. thesis, violating Harvard's policies on academic integrity.
Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., criticized Harvard University President Claudine Gay on X after the Ivy League leader apologized for remarks made on antisemitism during Tuesday's congressional hearing.
If this story is incorrect and she did NOT plagiarize large parts of her dissertation on "Black Electoral Success," then provide a defense. Sane, open-minded people want to know the truth.
If this story just hurts your feelings because it violates a cherished narrative and you find yourself clicking "Report Post," then ask yourself why censoring is so central to your ideology.
The funny thing about Rep Elise Stefanik is that she was called out for not directly condemning the racist in Charlottesville back in 2017. Recall when they marched on the UVA campus chanting "Jews will not replace us". She refused to call the POS wyt folks violent white supremacists. She refused to call it and label what it was. Now she acts like she is Captain save a Jew by attacking university presidents. Who had zero to do with demonstrations that support Palestinians and their independence.
If this story is incorrect and she did NOT plagiarize large parts of her dissertation on "Black Electoral Success," then provide a defense. Sane, open-minded people want to know the truth.
Free speech and all that crap, but strong accusations require strong evidence so the burden of proof is on you.
Christopher Rufo is a conservative propagandist. He is also a snowflake who limits who can see his tweets, so nobody can see the evidence for his likely false claims. And nobody really cares about Harvard.
If this story is incorrect and she did NOT plagiarize large parts of her dissertation on "Black Electoral Success," then provide a defense. Sane, open-minded people want to know the truth.
Free speech and all that crap, but strong accusations require strong evidence so the burden of proof is on you.
Author has reached out to Gay's office for comment which is the fair thing to do. Thus far, no reply. But happy to include her explanation.
I have sent repeated emails to President Gay's office and she has not responded. If she does, I will update the story with her comments.
If this story is incorrect and she did NOT plagiarize large parts of her dissertation on "Black Electoral Success," then provide a defense. Sane, open-minded people want to know the truth.
If this story just hurts your feelings because it violates a cherished narrative and you find yourself clicking "Report Post," then ask yourself why censoring is so central to your ideology.
SMH.....dumb ass, that is not how this works. Any fool, like the ones you support can say any dumb s*** about anyone. The burden of proof is not on the accused, it is on the person saying dumb s***.
If this story is incorrect and she did NOT plagiarize large parts of her dissertation on "Black Electoral Success," then provide a defense. Sane, open-minded people want to know the truth.
If this story just hurts your feelings because it violates a cherished narrative and you find yourself clicking "Report Post," then ask yourself why censoring is so central to your ideology.
Odd that they hired her one year ago and the search committee did not uncover this.
If this story is incorrect and she did NOT plagiarize large parts of her dissertation on "Black Electoral Success," then provide a defense. Sane, open-minded people want to know the truth.
If this story just hurts your feelings because it violates a cherished narrative and you find yourself clicking "Report Post," then ask yourself why censoring is so central to your ideology.
SMH.....dumb ass, that is not how this works. Any fool, like the ones you support can say any dumb s*** about anyone. The burden of proof is not on the accused, it is on the person saying dumb s***.
YOU PROVE IT OR STFU
Rufo's tweet thread literally proves it by showing side-by-sides of previous writings and how those compare to what she passed off as her own.