Can I put 500 miles on the Rincon 3?

I put 632mi on my first pair, recently started pair #2.

I really like them but i only use my rincons as racing shoes now. i was only getting like 100 miles out of them before my shins would hurt. I have glass legs tho, i use the Bondis as my regular trainer getting about 400 miles on the road out of them before they become a grass only shoe. If you have strong legs then they'll probs be a great shoe for you. They feel really good tho man like running on a cloud lmao. If your prone to injury id go more heavy duty and go bondi. Also might get wide version instead of the normal, my feet are narrow and i was still getting blisters in them.

Sounds like others have had different experience, but I really didn't agree with the Rincon 3's. Gave them away after a few weeks of trying them under different circumstances. Maybe I didn't spend long enough breaking them in, but they were already wearing, and they bruised my toenails - and that was enough for me to throw in the towel on them. They just seemed average in every respect and even if they didn't bruise my toenails I don't know where they would fit into my shoe rotation (not soft, not fast, blah).

1) The outsole wore very quickly. One of the least durable "training" shoes I have experienced.

2) Its as if the clunky midsole both (a) lacked cushion, but also (b) diminished the responsiveness. These are neither cushy nor responsive shoes. Really not impressed with the midsole material they used here.

3) I haven't killed my toenails in a long time. 5-7 runs in with these shoes, I had two black toenails.

Absolutely. Reasonably light/medium body weight, w/ no wicked foot strike aberration, you could easily log 500+. They’re criticized for using plain old vanilla EVA, but it is compression molded, the primary source of many new infused foams. How many miles does any runner use one shoe for anyway?
Raised sidewalls, sculpted/flared midsole geometry, subtle rocker, it’s a stable lightweight for a good price. Way more comfortable than the kinvara foam - although the K fits like a spike. I’ve used 3 Rincons and have had no problems - although the Hyperion tempo is my go-to, along w/ the cyclone 2.

Smoke less weed bruh and at least try the Cliftons (too heavy - soft for me) or Mach 4 / 5 ... Bondi is way too much shoe for most people here.

Rincon is my go-to mid-distance run shoe. You could do speed work in them as they are light and pretty fast, but there are better shoes to do that in. My 1st pair didn't seem to last long. They've gotten a lot better. I think 400-500 miles is feasible. I really like the Rincon.

I had a very similar experience - it honestly felt like the shoe was working against me. Kinda scared me off buying other hoka shoes.

As a bigger runner(180+) I'm not too sure about the Hoka line. If my Clifton had some missile deformity at 150miles doesnt bode well for even more missile exposure in Rincon.

Brooks' dna critical foam though, it's really progress. Catamount 1, Hyperion tempo it compresses just enough while staying resilient keeping your gait/form. At the shop I tried on new Hyperion Max and straight away was good

I would like to try the Hyperion Max v1 once it goes on clearance. I have the Catamount v2 which supposedly uses the responsive DNA Flash midsole and it's been a solid shoe. The current DNA Flash is a moderately firm foam.

I think HOKA is extremely overrated. Put that money to use on a pair of FC Rebels. The squishy and responsive Fuelcell foam would be a better compliment to the Kinvara's comparably firmer PWRRUN foam.

Most certainly. I have gotten between 800 and 900 miles on each of my Rincons. Rincon 3 still feels brand new at 350 miles. Favorite shoe by far.

Hokas for me have been hit or miss but I really like the Mach.

How many miles can I expect from my Tecton x2?