Wouldn't that be the logical conclusion of this bust? I mean they have the same genes. So if they run the same times with only one of them being on drugs, it means the drugs don't work. If drugs do work, then why isn't Jake faster?
Wouldn't that be the logical conclusion of this bust? I mean they have the same genes. So if they run the same times with only one of them being on drugs, it means the drugs don't work. If drugs do work, then why isn't Jake faster?
I am going with option 2. Also because they are good buddies and moved to Kenya to train and live together. Unthinkable that one of them is clean but not the other one.
It genuinely does not prove anything. Zane is guilty. His brother may or may not be. That is all. This is not a direct indictment of Jake Robertson. Zane Robertson was busted.
Fixed now, but I had Jake's 5000m off....their numbers are incredibly close through the distances. If one was doping and one wasn't, wouldn't one have at least a couple of events that are way faster, one? All?
Either they both doped or they both didn't or EPO doesn't work. Or finally, perhaps he only doped at the end for a last final grasp at a pb?
Wouldn't that be the logical conclusion of this bust? I mean they have the same genes. So if they run the same times with only one of them being on drugs, it means the drugs don't work. If drugs do work, then why isn't Jake faster?
One of them should have doped through the roof and the other stayed clean. Then put the location of the clean one on all the whereabouts forms. After each year switch roles.
It's also very likely that Zane only began doping in the last few years - out of desperation, after a string of injuries.
Maybe he saw one too many guys getting away with it, and maybe someone gave him EPO during a moment of weakness, and rather than thinking long term, he thought "well, it's a long way back from here."
But who knows, maybe both were indoctrinated into the doping culture in Kenya fairly early on. It wouldn't be difficult, given that they were 16 went they arrived, and likely very impressionable.
Wouldn't that be the logical conclusion of this bust? I mean they have the same genes. So if they run the same times with only one of them being on drugs, it means the drugs don't work. If drugs do work, then why isn't Jake faster?
Identical twins often don't have the same PBs. My identical twin was better than me, eventhough I trained better. The doping one could concievably have needed to dope to keep up with his twin, with his twin being clean.
That said, they are both probably doping because they were living and training together and sharing, likely similar personalities (personality is more getetically determined than one thinks), meaning they are likely to have the same personal propensity to want to dope given they are in the same environment. That's the bigger red flag than the PBs being similar.
Wouldn't that be the logical conclusion of this bust? I mean they have the same genes. So if they run the same times with only one of them being on drugs, it means the drugs don't work. If drugs do work, then why isn't Jake faster?
Identical twins often don't have the same PBs. My identical twin was better than me, eventhough I trained better. The doping one could concievably have needed to dope to keep up with his twin, with his twin being clean.
That said, they are both probably doping because they were living and training together and sharing, likely similar personalities (personality is more getetically determined than one thinks), meaning they are likely to have the same personal propensity to want to dope given they are in the same environment. That's the bigger red flag than the PBs being similar.
They haven't been living and training together. They've been living and training in different countries for the better part of 10 years.
It's not clear Zane was doping when he set (any of) those PRs. He may have started doping at the point when he felt catching up to his old PRs would be impossible. Doping to stay in the game, as it were. People say Asbel Kiprop did that, for example.
It's not clear Zane was doping when he set (any of) those PRs. He may have started doping at the point when he felt catching up to his old PRs would be impossible. Doping to stay in the game, as it were. People say Asbel Kiprop did that, for example.
Imbecile doping apologists say that about Kiprop, the only guy since El Full Throttle to run 3:26.
Wouldn't that be the logical conclusion of this bust? I mean they have the same genes. So if they run the same times with only one of them being on drugs, it means the drugs don't work. If drugs do work, then why isn't Jake faster?
The problem with this argument is timeline. It’s impossible to say how long Zane had been taking EPO for. It may have been for many years and he’s managed to evade getting caught or it might be very recent. E.g got overly frustrated with all the athletes taking EPO and decided to join the dark side also. All of their best times were set in the order of 6+ years ago so if it was a recent transgression then their similar times makes perfect sense.
This post was edited 11 minutes after it was posted.
Robertson's appeared to do everything together and nearly the same. This positive test essentially implicates the twin too. They train in an area notorious for epo use and distribution. In fact, many runners go to Kenya simply for easy access to dope and discretion/anonymity in doping.
This post was edited 27 seconds after it was posted.