No. The ABSOLUTE best case would be a 29.1/30.9 for a 60flat. The odds are against that, though. A 64 is a much more likely. Just rent all the movies and see for yourself. He's very not fast. Tons and tons of fat boys with mediocre talent would easily beat him at his best.
If this is you, Tom, I'm sorry, but I gotta call it like I see it. (And, I am PrettySure I'm correct.)
Dude isn't nearly in as good of shape as you think. Mostly Hollywood smoke and mirrors. Here's a photo of him from a few years ago that hasn't been carefully shot and doctored.
He could never break 60 at his peak. He's 5'5. It looks like he's running fast because his tiny limbs are moving fast but his steps are 1 foot in length because he's a midget.
This article says Cruise admitted his peak running speed was 17 miles per hour. He was probably bragging because he thought this was fast....IT IS SLOW. 60 in the 400 is 15 miles per hour. So at his peak, he could hold 17 mph for maybe 60 meters but would surely be slower than 60 in the 400.
We've updated our BetterRunningShoes.com web site to make it easier to find good deals on the best shoes. To keep it great we need new shoe reviews from you.