I made this thread a month ago when she had an obvious baby bump on her wedding photos and it got deleted due to "speculation based on a womans body". Well there you have it guys, so much for the speculation.
I made this thread a month ago when she had an obvious baby bump on her wedding photos and it got deleted due to "speculation based on a womans body". Well there you have it guys, so much for the speculation.
“Speculation based on a woman’s body” sounds rather Orwellian, just like something a moderator would say. Make sure not to engage in “speculation” of that nature, at any cost.
I made this thread a month ago when she had an obvious baby bump on her wedding photos and it got deleted due to "speculation based on a womans body". Well there you have it guys, so much for the speculation.
Do you know what the definition of speculation is? You were absolutely speculating a month ago. Now, you are no longer speculating. smh.
speculation should be allowed. it's free speech. not right to censor it. if you dress it up as fact, well that's another matter.
I was just pointing out that on her wedding images she appears clearly pregnant and that that would align with her having not raced recently etc. I mean I was not stalking her just looking at pics she posted. And if you post baby bump pics people will wonder its just normal. She is so skinny in normal life, its completely obvious when she had that bump. Go check her wedding pics...
So yes to me it is just stating the obvious. Its like a Nike sponsored runner suddenly showing up in like Saucony gear. We can point that out, right? Or is that also speculation?
So yes to me it is just stating the obvious. Its like a Nike sponsored runner suddenly showing up in like Saucony gear. We can point that out, right? Or is that also speculation?
Bad analogy. Speculating on pregnancy is not the same thing as a brand change. There are a lot of reasons why it’s awful behavior to babble on an anonymous website about a pregnancy that wasn’t announced and make weird comments about a woman’s body in her wedding dress. it’s not that obvious in her wedding photos.
Pregnancy can result in complications and there are a lot of reasons why people wait to announce. We don’t know her or any woman’s history around pregnancy unless they tell us.
so no sour grapes from you. You were careless and rude in your previous thread and congrats to Kate
So yes to me it is just stating the obvious. Its like a Nike sponsored runner suddenly showing up in like Saucony gear. We can point that out, right? Or is that also speculation?
Bad analogy. Speculating on pregnancy is not the same thing as a brand change. There are a lot of reasons why it’s awful behavior to babble on an anonymous website about a pregnancy that wasn’t announced and make weird comments about a woman’s body in her wedding dress. it’s not that obvious in her wedding photos.
Pregnancy can result in complications and there are a lot of reasons why people wait to announce. We don’t know her or any woman’s history around pregnancy unless they tell us.
so no sour grapes from you. You were careless and rude in your previous thread and congrats to Kate
Agreed. You aren't entitled to her personal health information. It's her news to share.
Congrats to her and hubby. This might now lend itself well as a assistant coach for Bosshard. It seems Kate was doing a lot of recording, timing workouts already due to her long Covid symptoms
I made this thread a month ago when she had an obvious baby bump on her wedding photos and it got deleted due to "speculation based on a womans body". Well there you have it guys, so much for the speculation.
It was speculation until she confirmed it. You got lucky.
speculation should be allowed. it's free speech. not right to censor it. if you dress it up as fact, well that's another matter.
Freedom of speech relates to government's ability to constrain speech. So this would only be a relevant point if the government was telling you not to speculate about Kate Grace's baby bump.
I made this thread a month ago when she had an obvious baby bump on her wedding photos and it got deleted due to "speculation based on a womans body". Well there you have it guys, so much for the speculation.
I had already posted this (TWICE) and it was deleted because apparently the mods here have no sense of humor, as I made a joke about her not being married prior to becoming pregnant. It was clearly sarcasm, but the morons that run this place are too stupid to understand concepts that require IQs above room temperature.