Who you got for this year?
-
37
-
#1: Top-rated Training Shoe: Brooks Ghost 15 for $99Get a top 1%-rated shoe right now for $99 (30% off) -
University of Oklahoma / tcu men’s
160 -
St. Bonaventure
360 -
University of Minnesota is looking to be down this year too. They finished 21st at nationals but lost their 1-6. The transfers they have coming in will be in their top 7 but won’t turn this team into a national caliber team.
1222 -
Murray State University Men's XC program
60 -
Evansville?
Robert Morris?
SE Missouri?
Texas Tech?
Fairfield?
Florida Atlantic?
Tulane?
Longwood? (Really?)
CSUN?
333 -
Idk about Tulane. They seem to have gotten a lot of transfers
110 -
Evansville’s Indoor mile record is 4:14.6 from 1983.
4:36.2 earns you an all time top 10.
720 -
Jhhj wrote:
Evansville’s Indoor mile record is 4:14.6 from 1983.
4:36.2 earns you an all time top 10.
How long have they been D1 for?
240 -
Vanderbilt. They don’t even try
322 -
CopperRunner wrote:
Jhhj wrote:
Evansville’s Indoor mile record is 4:14.6 from 1983.
4:36.2 earns you an all time top 10.
How long have they been D1 for?
1977?
11 -
I think it’s 1962
11 -
Jhhj wrote:
Evansville’s Indoor mile record is 4:14.6 from 1983.
4:36.2 earns you an all time top 10.
At NP, you would need a 4:26 (1600m) to be top 10 (just this year).
142 -
Miami (FL), they are the worst in the ACC by far
210 -
I posted a thread very similar to this a while ago. If I recall, Vanderbilt, Louisville, Syracuse, and Boston College were all incredibly bad. I could be misremembering.
105 -
Dutch Sprinter wrote:
I posted a thread very similar to this a while ago. If I recall, Vanderbilt, Louisville, Syracuse, and Boston College were all incredibly bad. I could be misremembering.
I don’t think you understand.
At XC regionals last year, there were 205 finishers. Winning time was 29:50.
Evansville runners finished:
179 (34:11)
192 (35:14)
200 (36:54)
203 (37:32)
204 (39:31)
205 (39:57)
590 -
Jhhj wrote:
Dutch Sprinter wrote:
I posted a thread very similar to this a while ago. If I recall, Vanderbilt, Louisville, Syracuse, and Boston College were all incredibly bad. I could be misremembering.
I don’t think you understand.
At XC regionals last year, there were 205 finishers. Winning time was 29:50.
Evansville runners finished:
179 (34:11)
192 (35:14)
200 (36:54)
203 (37:32)
204 (39:31)
205 (39:57)
I dont know what Evansville even is. I was talking about track, and power 5 schools, that should be expected to reasonably competitive. I certainly can't speak to cross country at all.
118 -
Jhhj wrote:
Dutch Sprinter wrote:
I posted a thread very similar to this a while ago. If I recall, Vanderbilt, Louisville, Syracuse, and Boston College were all incredibly bad. I could be misremembering.
I don’t think you understand.
At XC regionals last year, there were 205 finishers. Winning time was 29:50.
Evansville runners finished:
179 (34:11)
192 (35:14)
200 (36:54)
203 (37:32)
204 (39:31)
205 (39:57)
absolute filler sport so they can have a div 1 basketball team...would be shocked if they allotted anything more than the minimum to get by for the budget... I would assume there is a local high school team that would beat them.
230 -
OGB(igote) wrote:
Jhhj wrote:
I don’t think you understand.
At XC regionals last year, there were 205 finishers. Winning time was 29:50.
Evansville runners finished:
179 (34:11)
192 (35:14)
200 (36:54)
203 (37:32)
204 (39:31)
205 (39:57)
absolute filler sport so they can have a div 1 basketball team...would be shocked if they allotted anything more than the minimum to get by for the budget... I would assume there is a local high school team that would beat them.
Ok, but how do they get people to go/participate? It’s quite embarrassing.
Do they have to go to regionals? is that a requirement?
21
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun