You absolutely cannot legitimately conclude that based on this result. I don’t believe the time/wind reading. Wind readings become increasingly inaccurate with increasing speed.
This time is irrelevant, it is the victory that matters. We will have to wait to see what else she does.
This result raised my eyebrows, but I'm also not buying the +3.2 wind reading. That's 10.85 basic. Hell of a PB for her if all things are in fact accurate.
Lot's of very very fast times from randoms and unknowns so far. Very odd IMO.
Heck yes! And just so you all know, she has a world silver medal from 2019 Doha world championships in the 200m. She is pretty unknown for someone with that accomplishment. I think she had some things not go her way last year and wasn't able to compete well in the olympic year, but looks like she's back as good as ever.
Not bad for someone who had a collegiate pb of 11.28 (her pb from earler this year is 10.99). Brown did win WC silver in 200 in 2019.
We should note she beat Gabby Thomas by .14. We have plenty of data from Thomas this year (taking out Bermuda with massive headwinds): 10.92 (+2.9) 11.00 (+1.6) 10.86 (+3.3) 10.80 (+3.2)
Makes me think, maybe the race was a tad bit aberrationally fast, but not a crazy amount. Brown is likely in 10.90 type shape with still wind.