I've always wanted to know why like every single girl at NCAA xc falls over at the finish line. It's so common I wondered if there was a biological reason for it.
Maybe not as for the first time ever, I've seen it in a men's race.
The Picture of the Night: The Post-Race Carnage evident across the track after all-out efforts saw 23 runners break nine minutes in the boys 3200 at the 2022 Arcadia Invitational! 🔥📸 by @mrpotatojimmypic.twitter.com/E7CbOYfxwI
Females suffer higher blood pressure drop-offs upon immediate cessation of high-intensity exercise. Thus the loss of faculties, shaky legs and light-headedness.
Your bulb is short of a spark. It was championship xc skiers. How often do you see their counterparts, championship endurance runners, littering the track like those schoolboys?
Your bulb is short of a spark. It was championship xc skiers. How often do you see their counterparts, championship endurance runners, littering the track like those schoolboys?
I just watched the World Indoor Championships and it happened quite often that a lot of races finished with runners flat on the track.
But we know you never watched the Olympic xc skiers - who virtually all collapsed. Most championship runners aren't like a bunch of exhausted schoolboys. Or xc skiers.
I just watched the World Indoor Championships and it happened quite often that a lot of races finished with runners flat on the track.
But we know you never watched the Olympic xc skiers - who virtually all collapsed. Most championship runners aren't like a bunch of exhausted schoolboys. Or xc skiers.
"virtually all", "most", "bunch", "often" -- can you be any more vague?
Females suffer higher blood pressure drop-offs upon immediate cessation of high-intensity exercise. Thus the loss of faculties, shaky legs and light-headedness.
Oh course an earlier post immediately claims sexism and gets a bunch of upvotes. I had never thought of this but now that it is pointed out, I would say much more females do this than males. Oh course I’m just a sexist bigot even if there is scientific reasons explaining this
But we know you never watched the Olympic xc skiers - who virtually all collapsed. Most championship runners aren't like a bunch of exhausted schoolboys. Or xc skiers.
"virtually all", "most", "bunch", "often" -- can you be any more vague?
So you want figures - like the bean-counter you are. Nothing exists if it isn't one of your statistics? It appears "many", "most", "a lot" - or even "a few" - aren't in your very limited lexicon. It explains why reality is extremely confusing for you.
"virtually all", "most", "bunch", "often" -- can you be any more vague?
So you want figures - like the bean-counter you are. Nothing exists if it isn't one of your statistics? It appears "many", "most", "a lot" - or even "a few" - aren't in your very limited lexicon. It explains why reality is extremely confusing for you.
Armstronglivs and Reality? There's an oxymoron for you.
The OP started saying "every single girl at NCAA xc falls over at the finish line".
"virtually all", "most", "bunch", "often" -- can you be any more vague?
So you want figures - like the bean-counter you are. Nothing exists if it isn't one of your statistics? It appears "many", "most", "a lot" - or even "a few" - aren't in your very limited lexicon. It explains why reality is extremely confusing for you.
Bean-counter? So now you insult mathematicians, accountants and statisticians? Man, you are so stupid.