Takes avoiding eye contact on the London tube to a whole new level. Thanks Sadique Khan, although your ever growing voter base will no doubt be happy.
-
5127
-
#2
This post was removed.
-
Many women like to look at men's butts especially in tight jeans and sweatpants. But these laws obviously blatantly target men, who are all naturaly sexual seeking beings and driven by testosterone. But if any laws were made which targeted women, they be deemed "misogyny." Double standards. Toxic victim complex which ironically hinders women more than it helps. And look, I'm obviously all for equity and equality for women and men but we don't need to try and shame and suppress men to accomplish this.
Liberals have now made it a crime to look at someone. What if people feel violated when others look at their face? Will they be accommodated too? Heck I'm even sick of being looked at by people who's lives are too boring that they have to use others for entertainment 24/7. Make a god damn move. Sheesh.
9982 -
Liberalism is the virus.
I made a custom shirt that said the above message and a couple lefties were trigged AF, lashing out at me in their unusual unintelligible , irrational and emotional outbursts.
9895 -
Birkoboy wrote:
The world has gone wrong brained wrote:
Takes avoiding eye contact on the London tube to a whole new level. Thanks Sadique Khan, although your ever growing voter base will no doubt be happy.
London doesn't have a metro,and it's Sadiq Khan.Other than that well done on showing your ignorance.
Alright Khanite, metro is a global and American term for a subway train system. This is an American site. Notice I said 'London tube' in the text. Now get back on your daily commute with your head facing the floor like a good little Khanite.
5526 -
And women have their own site where they can upload candid photos they took of men on the Tube that they fancied.
4313 -
Birkoboy wrote:
The world has gone wrong brained wrote:
Takes avoiding eye contact on the London tube to a whole new level. Thanks Sadique Khan, although your ever growing voter base will no doubt be happy.
London doesn't have a metro,and it's Sadiq Khan.Other than that well done on showing your ignorance.
Hey Bawbagboy, the London Underground, or the Tube, is a metro system. And if you are going to call people out on spelling mistakes then get busy calling yourself out, moron.
3616 -
Steve The Addict OFFICIAL -----^^^^^ wrote:
But if any laws were made which targeted women, they be deemed "misogyny." Double standards.
The posters actually encourage anybody who 'sees' staring on the tube to report it. So women (and other men) are actually being encouraged to stare at men, in order to 'catch' them staring at women.
The sad thing is a majority of London's population will actually see this as a good thing, and not only the Muslims, as this BikaBoy guy testifies.
3326 -
rarest wrote:
Birkoboy wrote:
London doesn't have a metro,and it's Sadiq Khan.Other than that well done on showing your ignorance.
Hey Bawbagboy, the London Underground, or the Tube, is a metro system. And if you are going to call people out on spelling mistakes then get busy calling yourself out, moron.
Think you'll find it's moran.
2131 -
Birkoboy wrote:
The world has gone wrong brained wrote:
Takes avoiding eye contact on the London tube to a whole new level. Thanks Sadique Khan, although your ever growing voter base will no doubt be happy.
London doesn't have a metro,and it's Sadiq Khan.Other than that well done on showing your ignorance.
It's not just his name that is mis-spelled. His name is actually pronounced Sard-ik. Almost everyone, including the London media pronounce is Sad-eek
'Sidique Khan' was one of one of the bombers on 7/7. Whether or not the frequently mis-spelling with -que is a freudian slip like Obama/Osama is debateable.
36 -
Steve, would you feel comfortable if a very large guy looked menacing and was sitting across from you on the train or bus just staring and occasionally licking his lips? You would like that to be ok? What about when he gets up at your stop and follows you off the train?
225 -
or... wrote:
Steve, would you feel comfortable if a very large guy looked menacing and was sitting across from you on the train or bus just staring and occasionally licking his lips? You would like that to be ok? What about when he gets up at your stop and follows you off the train?
Yep fine with me. I'll deal with him accordingly. But if he did that to a woman I'd call him out. Now obviously, I'm not okay with harassment aimed at anyone. But I'm just stating how liberal society now caters as a disneyland/candyland to the "weak" at the expense of the "strong," with a litany of double standards present at every avenue.
3232 -
The world has gone wrong brained wrote:
And women have their own site where they can upload candid photos they took of men on the Tube that they fancied.
Ummm . . . . it isn't actually women posting there. It is men using women's names.
113 -
Steve The Addict OFFICIAL -----^^^^^ wrote:
Many women like to look at men's butts especially in tight jeans and sweatpants. But these laws obviously blatantly target men, who are all naturaly sexual seeking beings and driven by testosterone. But if any laws were made which targeted women, they be deemed "misogyny." Double standards. Toxic victim complex which ironically hinders women more than it helps. And look, I'm obviously all for equity and equality for women and men but we don't need to try and shame and suppress men to accomplish this.
Liberals have now made it a crime to look at someone. What if people feel violated when others look at their face? Will they be accommodated too? Heck I'm even sick of being looked at by people who's lives are too boring that they have to use others for entertainment 24/7. Make a god damn move. Sheesh.
Yeah what are these women even upset about you know? There’s nothing wrong. Men are great and never do anything wrong.
102 -
#17
This post was removed.
-
#18
This post was removed.
-
or... wrote:
Steve, would you feel comfortable if a very large guy looked menacing and was sitting across from you on the train or bus just staring and occasionally licking his lips? You would like that to be ok? What about when he gets up at your stop and follows you off the train?
Or, would you feel comfortable if some attractive young hottie came and sat opposite you on the tube, wearing a skirt that barely covers her things, and a top that barely covers her upper deck, and then some very large menacing looking guy coming over to you and put you in a choke hold while the cops are called, because he thought you were 'staring' at her?
2712 -
The world has gone wrong brained wrote:
or... wrote:
Steve, would you feel comfortable if a very large guy looked menacing and was sitting across from you on the train or bus just staring and occasionally licking his lips? You would like that to be ok? What about when he gets up at your stop and follows you off the train?
Or, would you feel comfortable if some attractive young hottie came and sat opposite you on the tube, wearing a skirt that barely covers her things, and a top that barely covers her upper deck, and then some very large menacing looking guy coming over to you and put you in a choke hold while the cops are called, because he thought you were 'staring' at her?
Would be very unlikely to happen. The menacing guy would be too busy not looking at anyone to notice what was going on.
It's a basic rule that you don't look at anyone on the underground.
31
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
Of General Interest
-
Sometimes it seems like Cooper Teare is not that good BUT…
-
Matt Fox/SweatElite harasses one of his clients after they called him out
-
Irish gymnast shows you can have sex in the "anti-sex" cardboard beds in the Olympic village (video)
-
2024 College Track & Field Open Coaching Positions Discussion
-
Finishing a mountain stage in the Tour De France vs running a marathon: Which is harder?
-
Per sources, Colorado expected to hire NAU assistant coach Jarred Cornfield as head xc coach
-
Sydney MCLAUGHLIN-LEVRONE's chance at the 800m world record.