Those of you who think LRC has been too open-minded about this will love this article.https://www.3wiresports.com/articles/2021/9/2/time-for-shelby-houlihan-to-come-clean
AA wrote:
This entire saga, truthfully, has been pathetic.
This burrito defense has, from the get-go, stretched the bounds of credulity, and anyone who bought it — even for a second — needs to undergo a real-world moron test.
Do you also believe pigs can fly?
Almost every single facet of Houlihan’s defense was — is — absurd.
To be clear: not blaming Houlihan’s lawyers for aggressively scheming up any and every avenue possible. That’s what they’re there for.
But the three-judge panel went to great length — again, 44 pages — to refute, carefully, virtually everything about it.
For instance:
Houlihan took a lie detector test.
She was asked, did you at any time knowingly ingest nandrolone? And answered no. She was also asked, did you intentionally ingest the drug nandrolone? And said, no.
But as the panel pointed out, here’s what she wasn’t asked: did you take doping substances at the material time?
Those of you who love the piece, before you dance on our grave, you might want to read this as well as you may not love all of his opinions.
https://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=10656328I personally like Alan and like how he's a rare person not afraid to have an opinion but that doesn't mean it's always right. That being said, he makes some good points here.