There are a couple of elected socialists in the Dem party, yes. But socialism is not a contagious disease. It appears nowhere in the laws and orders and platform of the Dem party. No state ownership of the means of production. Not a thing. Facts, feelings, eh?
Actually, it was GWB who nationalized General Moters. Obama privatized it.
Neither has been accused of a crime, so, no, I don't think so.
I do think a red wave in the midterms brings Hunter's laptop and all the garbage on it into the 24 hour news cycle, and I do not look forward to that moment.
Neither has been accused of a crime, so, no, I don't think so.
I do think a red wave in the midterms brings Hunter's laptop and all the garbage on it into the 24 hour news cycle, and I do not look forward to that moment.
That "garbage" being proof Joe Biden is corrupt as hell...
It's interesting, because for many of us, it was a bit surprising when Trump taught us that extremely wealthy people could be SO dumb.
And then we learn something very similar - at least regarding understanding of human nature - about THE richest person in the world. "Time outs" for adults who have demonstrated extremely bad behavior on Twitter. Yes, THAT will get them to change. The naivete is astounding.
Newsflash, Elon: Horrible adults don't change. And even for the tiny percentage who might, a permanent punishment (not involving death or imprisonment) in reward for their bad behavior is still perfectly fine. In fact, it's better than fine, it's just.
It is hysterical that you think you're smarter than Elon Musk.
Yeah, I'm done with you. You're just a dumb ass**** who gets WAY, WAY too much attention from actual adults on this thread.
I and probably the rest of the adults should have decided that a LONG time ago. Ditto for Gary and Sally and a number of others, but somehow, you manage to be EVEN MORE dislikeable than them (you guys are so close on horrendous thinking skills/consistency and Trump brainwashing, I'll call it a draw, there). And yes, I know that you'll view this 100% accurate insult as a victory.
It is hysterical that you think you're smarter than Elon Musk.
In this case, nonequals might have one up on Elon.
Musk is a brilliant engineer. He knows a lot about science, physics, software, rocketry, manufacturing, and business.
But Asperger's patients are not exactly known for their understanding of human behavior.
Have you learned nothing about rich and/or famous folks? "Average" folks like me constantly have a lot "up on" folks with a lot more money or fame. Lots of them say and do dumb things - oftentimes even involving subject matter associated with their elevated place - constantly. And the world sees it. Duh. Most recently, we learned that Mitch McConnell thought that Trump was dead, post riot. Political genius? Maybe not so much.
The fact that you feel the need to explain it seems to, at least, suggest how many "average folks" do, however, fail to grasp this really obvious fact.
The "material" bit was the issue. There was clear evidence of fraud. The cell phone data and video footage of the mules in action is the material evidence that was missing.
Why hasn't anyone gone to court with these findings of yours?
Why hasn't anyone tracked down the so-called "mules"?
Shouldn't they be prosecuted?
If you have real evidence, it shouldn't be hard to at least get an indictment or two.
Also, if this organization has real evidence of election fraud (a felony) and they don't turn it over then they themselves could be guilty of a crime.
You are sooooooooooo gullible! I hope you didn't send them any money.
Yeah, I'm done with you. You're just a dumb ass**** who gets WAY, WAY too much attention from actual adults on this thread.
I and probably the rest of the adults should have decided that a LONG time ago. Ditto for Gary and Sally and a number of others, but somehow, you manage to be EVEN MORE dislikeable than them (you guys are so close on horrendous thinking skills/consistency and Trump brainwashing, I'll call it a draw, there). And yes, I know that you'll view this 100% accurate insult as a victory.
Just f*** off for all time.
Cry more, New York queer.
Hey look, I talk like a homophobe circa 1975. Your parents must be SO proud.
Then again, often the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, so quite likely they're detestable human beings, just like you.
And Trump owns ALL of you.
He does have SOME "skills." The Pied Piper of shi*** human beings, like you.
It is hysterical that you think you're smarter than Elon Musk.
Yeah, I'm done with you. You're just a dumb ass**** who gets WAY, WAY too much attention from actual adults on this thread.
I and probably the rest of the adults should have decided that a LONG time ago. Ditto for Gary and Sally and a number of others, but somehow, you manage to be EVEN MORE dislikeable than them (you guys are so close on horrendous thinking skills/consistency and Trump brainwashing, I'll call it a draw, there). And yes, I know that you'll view this 100% accurate insult as a victory.
In the immediate aftermath of the January 6 riot at the US Capitol, Mitch McConnell thought he had finally gotten his wish: Donald Trump would be excised from the Republican Party for the role he played in fomenting the insur...
"It's striking that McConnell, one of the top political minds in the Republican Party, so badly misjudged how January 6 would play with his party's base. And it speaks to the fact that many Republican leaders remain removed from the beliefs of their party's base."
This is a great example of the annoying thing that the dreaded "MSM" constantly - and very charitably for the horrendous R party - gets wrong about Trump and Rs. Why do they insist on talking about the "base" of R party, like it's a small fraction? What's the current polling on how many of them still support Trump? And believe that the election was stolen? How many R officials have joined Cheney or Kinzinger....or even more wishy-washy Romney? Crickets.
None of that describes a minority "base" of a party. The extreme "base" is the vast majority of the party. And ONE MAN, incredibly transparently flawed, made it so? More or less, I think. Really amazing.
Yeah, I'm done with you. You're just a dumb ass**** who gets WAY, WAY too much attention from actual adults on this thread.
I and probably the rest of the adults should have decided that a LONG time ago. Ditto for Gary and Sally and a number of others, but somehow, you manage to be EVEN MORE dislikeable than them (you guys are so close on horrendous thinking skills/consistency and Trump brainwashing, I'll call it a draw, there). And yes, I know that you'll view this 100% accurate insult as a victory.
Just f*** off for all time.
You can just block him, problem solved
You're right, and you've said it before. I'm slow !!
Yeah, I'm done with you. You're just a dumb ass**** who gets WAY, WAY too much attention from actual adults on this thread.
I and probably the rest of the adults should have decided that a LONG time ago. Ditto for Gary and Sally and a number of others, but somehow, you manage to be EVEN MORE dislikeable than them (you guys are so close on horrendous thinking skills/consistency and Trump brainwashing, I'll call it a draw, there). And yes, I know that you'll view this 100% accurate insult as a victory.
The most chilling takeaway of a new haul of texts showing how former President Donald Trump's inner circle schemed to steal the 2020 election is not the delusional fervor of their plan or the casual way plotters rejected the...
"And the messages underscore how the most important divide in modern politics is not the age old struggle between liberalism and conservatism - a legitimate ideological duel over the meaning and direction of America. Instead, the great struggle of the early 21st century is between those in the Republican Party who are prepared to reject democracy and everyone else."
You know, for young basement geniuses who opened their stupid eyes around the time Trump came on the scene, thinking that America has and should work this way is at least a LITTLE (TINY, TINY, TINY) more understandable - i.e., it's all about tribe, not consistency or decency or honesty, etc. Although obviously, it certainly doesn't excuse the thinking.
But for your run-of-the-mill bitter middle/old-aged Trumper, I guess that NONE of them remember the R Senators telling Nixon that the game was up? And remember that there were just as many scary liberal D politicians like AOC and Bernie back then, who they COULD have decided were the greater threat than Nixon? But that didn't happen. Don't they remember that? Are they totally incapable of the cognitive dissonance that should cause with respect to the current situation of excusing EVERYTHING that Trump and the Rs do because there's a greater, fully imagined, liberal threat?
And....
"Still, the idea that Attorney General Merrick Garland would decide there was sufficient likelihood of a conviction to prosecute Trump strikes many legal and political observers as far-fetched."
Once again, reminds me of how future statements about "No man is above the law in the US" should be AT LEAST misdemeanors until our country gets itself un-f*****. Again, I imagine any citizen - and especially those involved in the rule of law and perhaps even trained by the U.S. - in third world countries thinking, "Are you kidding me? BLATANTLY and indefinitely trying to steal an election ISN'T against the law in the oh-so-wise and just 'merica?"
Or at least, none of it applies to the top public official (and EX-top public official), who they supposedly made sure a long time ago WASN'T a monarch ??? So, so pathetic and disappointing.
Of course, I'm open to someone with more legal wisdom than me (not hard) to explain what I might be missing about Garland's (and others'?) reluctance.
