Was Hunter Biden a candidate for office?
Was he in some way involved in his father's administration as say a White House advisor or Middle East Peace czar?
How could revealing the contents of Hunter's laptop - pictures purportedly showing drug use (already public knowledge) and patronage of sleazy women have changed the vote when he is not a candidate?
I suppose some people may want to draw a line and say bad son, must mean bad father. But the other Biden children are by most accounts model citizens. So I don't think individual voters would have changed their minds because of this.
And if you want to claim media bias, note that the "liberal media" covered James Comey reopening the investigation into the Clinton "email scandal" days before the Nov 2016 election in minute detail assiduously and in great detail. Even when Comey closed the issue declaring there was no there, there, the "liberal media" persisted. Some would say that cost Clinton.
So I just don't understand.