This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
Hey, Harambro, he’s literally not a fan of the mRNA vaccines, he doesn’t think they were critical for under 50s, he thinks they can cause injury and illness, he questions your pharmacokinetic assertions, and he only likes Novavax because he’s evolved. So, according to everything you’ve ever said, he’s an antivaxxer.
Now, will I listen to him all day long before I listen to you? Yes, absolutely. He’s smarter, more experienced, has access to all the published research you’ve ever had and much you haven’t, has access to other brilliant scientists and research across the globe, and he’s a clinician, so, he doesn’t need your permission to “trust his eyes.” But, he must just be jealous for not getting credit for the vaccines😂🤦♂️. You’re ridiculous, dude.
Yes, exactly. You like him because he parrots a few things you want to hear. He does so with no evidence. You decide to believe him simply because he makes you feel good. That's not intellectual.
Yes, exactly. You like him because he parrots a few things you want to hear. He does so with no evidence. You decide to believe him simply because he makes you feel good. That's not intellectual.
Yes, exactly. You like him because he parrots a few things you want to hear. He does so with no evidence. You decide to believe him simply because he makes you feel good. That's not intellectual.
So, he is an antivaxxer then?
The way you portray his viewpoints, he sure sounds like one :)
The way you portray his viewpoints, he sure sounds like one :)
Those viewpoints are on tape in a public interview linked here. He’s literally refuting your point of view and he’s doing so “lacking evidence,” according to you. He’s either an antivaxxer or he’s not in your world. There’s no gray area.
Everything I wrote is what he said, vax injuries, nobody really knowing how much vax-induced S protein is made after the mRNA molecule is introduced or how quickly it degrades, long vax, how it wasn’t critical for under 50s to get the vax, and why he prefers Novavax over the Pfizer/Moderna vaccine. You’re trying to weasel out of this. Is he anti vax?
The way you portray his viewpoints, he sure sounds like one :)
vax injuries, nobody really knowing how much vax-induced S protein is made after the mRNA molecule is introduced or how quickly it degrades, long vax, how it wasn’t critical for under 50s to get the vax
There has been reams of data collected and published on all the above issues that show his opinions are not based on evidence.
vax injuries, nobody really knowing how much vax-induced S protein is made after the mRNA molecule is introduced or how quickly it degrades, long vax, how it wasn’t critical for under 50s to get the vax
There has been reams of data collected and published on all the above issues that show his opinions are not based on evidence.
half life and tissue distribution of spike protein after mRNA vaccination has been so extensively studied - it's hard to tell if Sub90 is joking?
such analysis is even independent of comparing to infection-drive spike protein expression :)
The way you portray his viewpoints, he sure sounds like one :)
Those viewpoints are on tape in a public interview linked here. He’s literally refuting your point of view and he’s doing so “lacking evidence,” according to you. He’s either an antivaxxer or he’s not in your world. There’s no gray area.
Everything I wrote is what he said, vax injuries, nobody really knowing how much vax-induced S protein is made after the mRNA molecule is introduced or how quickly it degrades, long vax, how it wasn’t critical for under 50s to get the vax, and why he prefers Novavax over the Pfizer/Moderna vaccine. You’re trying to weasel out of this. Is he anti vax?
Sure, the best you can do is parrot another persons opinions. Still no evidence to support your antivaxxer views.
Yes, exactly. You like him because he parrots a few things you want to hear. He does so with no evidence. You decide to believe him simply because he makes you feel good. That's not intellectual.
So, he is an antivaxxer then?
Got it. So you are calling Dr. Redfield an “anti-vaxxer” on the record. Thanks for clearing it up. People can decide for themselves here with 7:30 left in the podcast. Interesting former head of CDC and clinician’s view.
Chris Cuomo hosts "CUOMO," a no-nonsense show featuring the day's most important news from all perspectives. "CUOMO" airs weeknights at 8 p.m./7C on NewsNation.
This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/ex-cdc-director-says-its-high-time-admit-significant-side-effects-covid-19-vaccinesDiscus. There's a reason no pure bloods regret it
We've updated our BetterRunningShoes.com web site to make it easier to find good deals on the best shoes. To keep it great we need new shoe reviews from you.