DONALD Trump stormed out of a world exclusive interview with Piers Morgan in a blazing row over the ‘stolen’ US presidential election. The ex-President reached boiling point after Piers…
"Almost 2 million people entered the United States without authorization in the 12-month period ending on Sept. 30, the U.S. government reported on Friday."
They entered the US without authorization. When they were apprehended they were in the US. They were already across the border. The border IS open. The US Border agents can not apprehend illegals in Mexico.
So you think they should have been apprehended in Mexico?
They weren't illegal in Mexico... why is this so confusing to you?
Do you understand that there is a difference between a stranger on your sidewalk and a stranger in your kitchen?
There are about 6 BILLION people in the world who would be much better off in America than where they currently live. Do you think all 6 billion of them should be allowed to enter America if they want to?
Quality posters only01/20/2017 2:24am EST7 years ago
Who you got, the bikers or the liberal whiners? I'm thinking the bikers in a landslide.LRC Note: This thread was inititially titled, "Official LRC President Donald J Trump Inauguration Thread " and is the thread to discuss/...
According to your article, the reason they know about these immigrants is because they were apprehended trying to cross over. Thus, the border is not open.
Not everyone who crosses is apprehended. Then, not everyone apprehended is deported. Then, those deported don't get punished anymore so they just try again until they get through. So it's effectively open.
According to your article, the reason they know about these immigrants is because they were apprehended trying to cross over. Thus, the border is not open.
And for everyone they catch there's more than 1 that they don't. No nation on earth can sustain this level of immigration let alone illegal immigration.
We don't actually know how many get in without being caught.
Whatever the level of illegal immigration really is, we have been sustaining it for many decades.
If you want to be mad at someone, get mad at all the Republican business owners who keep hiring them. The reason they come here is for the jobs. So if you really wanted to keep them out you would just go after the business owners who flout the law. It would be a lot cheaper and more effective than adding more border agents or building new walls.
So you think they should have been apprehended in Mexico?
They weren't illegal in Mexico... why is this so confusing to you?
Do you understand that there is a difference between a stranger on your sidewalk and a stranger in your kitchen?
There are about 6 BILLION people in the world who would be much better off in America than where they currently live. Do you think all 6 billion of them should be allowed to enter America if they want to?
That's why we arrest them and send them back where they came from. Thus, the borders are not open for anyone to just come in and stay.
Are you with me on arresting the business owners who hire illegal immigrants?
According to your article, the reason they know about these immigrants is because they were apprehended trying to cross over. Thus, the border is not open.
Not everyone who crosses is apprehended. Then, not everyone apprehended is deported. Then, those deported don't get punished anymore so they just try again until they get through. So it's effectively open.
you are arguing that there is no real control of the border, that all-in the border cops don't reduce immigration, that in the end the flows would be the same with the walls or without, with the tech or without, with the cops or without them. So we might as well send the cops home and tear down the wall for all the good they do.
Note that the 'conservative' governor and legislature are now punishing Disney for having political positions the government does not agree with. Using the power of the state to enforce political opinion.
And that, ladies and germs, is why we put 'conservative' in quotes when talking about American 'conservatives.'
And for everyone they catch there's more than 1 that they don't. No nation on earth can sustain this level of immigration let alone illegal immigration.
We don't actually know how many get in without being caught.
Whatever the level of illegal immigration really is, we have been sustaining it for many decades.
If you want to be mad at someone, get mad at all the Republican business owners who keep hiring them. The reason they come here is for the jobs. So if you really wanted to keep them out you would just go after the business owners who flout the law. It would be a lot cheaper and more effective than adding more border agents or building new walls.
1. We do have good estimates of how many get in, and it's way higher than previous years.
2. Oh, you want to stop business owners from hiring them? Then require e-verify and punish employers who do so. And vote out Democrats in places like California that have BANNED e-verify. And strengthen our border security so that there are fewer to hire. In other words, do the opposite of what the Democrats have been doing.
You have no idea if it was legitimate. The evidence all suggests it was not. The truth will be made public on May 2nd.
Trump is running 2024... going to be hard to move away from him if he's the president. I'd rather he didn't run but it's a certainty at this point. You can't steal an election from an egomaniac and expect him to just walk away.
You heard it here first folks.
The truth will be made public on May 2nd.
Will Mike Lindell be there? Will he bring the Cyber Ninjas?
I heard the reveal is going to be at Four Seasons Total Landscaping. Is that true?
And for everyone they catch there's more than 1 that they don't. No nation on earth can sustain this level of immigration let alone illegal immigration.
We don't actually know how many get in without being caught.
Whatever the level of illegal immigration really is, we have been sustaining it for many decades.
If you want to be mad at someone, get mad at all the Republican business owners who keep hiring them. The reason they come here is for the jobs. So if you really wanted to keep them out you would just go after the business owners who flout the law. It would be a lot cheaper and more effective than adding more border agents or building new walls.
That's like saying the boat has been sinking for 3 hours already and we're still floating what's the problem??
It's not just the jobs it's the money. You claim asylum, crap out some kids and TADA you don't even have to work and you're "rich" compared to where you were back in the 3rd world.
If you want a "living wage" for everyone step one is stop importing illegals who'll work under the table for less than Americans can work for.
E-verify is the answer to the businesses hiring them. Suggesting all of the businesses are Republicn is dishonest. Democrats oppose e-verify.
The fun part is Democrats are all for open borders because they think latinos will all vote for them. Biden's approval rating is 26% with hispanics. Your plan blew up in your face.
I'm still for securing the border. Once Democrats figure out they're importing Republicans they will be demanding land mines and machine gun nests at the border.
We don't actually know how many get in without being caught.
Whatever the level of illegal immigration really is, we have been sustaining it for many decades.
If you want to be mad at someone, get mad at all the Republican business owners who keep hiring them. The reason they come here is for the jobs. So if you really wanted to keep them out you would just go after the business owners who flout the law. It would be a lot cheaper and more effective than adding more border agents or building new walls.
1. We do have good estimates of how many get in, and it's way higher than previous years.
2. Oh, you want to stop business owners from hiring them? Then require e-verify and punish employers who do so. And vote out Democrats in places like California that have BANNED e-verify. And strengthen our border security so that there are fewer to hire. In other words, do the opposite of what the Democrats have been doing.
Don’t be so naive, LOTS of Republicans have quietly shot down e-verify for decades now.
1. We do have good estimates of how many get in, and it's way higher than previous years.
2. Oh, you want to stop business owners from hiring them? Then require e-verify and punish employers who do so. And vote out Democrats in places like California that have BANNED e-verify. And strengthen our border security so that there are fewer to hire. In other words, do the opposite of what the Democrats have been doing.
Don’t be so naive, LOTS of Republicans have quietly shot down e-verify for decades now.
A minority of R's versus the MAJORITY of D's. Big difference.
Not everyone who crosses is apprehended. Then, not everyone apprehended is deported. Then, those deported don't get punished anymore so they just try again until they get through. So it's effectively open.
you are arguing that there is no real control of the border, that all-in the border cops don't reduce immigration, that in the end the flows would be the same with the walls or without, with the tech or without, with the cops or without them. So we might as well send the cops home and tear down the wall for all the good they do.
Just want to make sure I understand the crazy.
Border control works when you have sufficient resources. Trump had this figured out, even without the wall.
you are arguing that there is no real control of the border, that all-in the border cops don't reduce immigration, that in the end the flows would be the same with the walls or without, with the tech or without, with the cops or without them. So we might as well send the cops home and tear down the wall for all the good they do.
Just want to make sure I understand the crazy.
Border control works when you have sufficient resources. Trump had this figured out, even without the wall.
ok so I guess you do want to end all border controls unless they look a certain way. weird.
but puleeze. immigration dropped because covid kept everyone home. And immigration is bouncing back because the US economy is roaring because of Joe-nomics and the South American economies are sucking wind. Jobs for everyone in this mammoth country tends to attract a lot of job-seekers.
sadly, If joe-nomics were a failure then we'd have a ton fewer immigrants. And less inflation. You are in effect punishing Joe for his great success.
According to your article, the reason they know about these immigrants is because they were apprehended trying to cross over. Thus, the border is not open.
Not everyone who crosses is apprehended. Then, not everyone apprehended is deported. Then, those deported don't get punished anymore so they just try again until they get through. So it's effectively open.
Those statements are true of nearly every nation on Earth. Therefore, according to YOU, nearly every nation on Earth has an open border.
Note that the 'conservative' governor and legislature are now punishing Disney for having political positions the government does not agree with. Using the power of the state to enforce political opinion.
And that, ladies and germs, is why we put 'conservative' in quotes when talking about American 'conservatives.'
The real reason is that Disney put a pause on all political donations.