His impeachments were political just as his acquittals were political. Sad all the way 'round.
Perfect example of non-persuasion. You wave away his impeachments with the simple word "political," without telling us WHY his conversation with Zelensky was a-ok? And his attempt to steal a presidential election was a-ok?
You're 100% pathetic.
Not simply handing money to corrupt foreign governments is a good thing. You've never explained why his conversation with Zelensky wasn't "a-ok". I'd bet a million dollars you've never even seen the conversation. You've been told to pretend to be outraged about it so that's what you do. Zelensky himself said there was no quid pro quo.
Trump didn't try to "steal" anything. It's hilarious that you know full well that Democrats stole the election and you still have the gall to pretend to be outraged by Trump contesting the results. But then, you were told to pretend to be outraged so you that's what you do.
Perfect example of non-persuasion. You wave away his impeachments with the simple word "political," without telling us WHY his conversation with Zelensky was a-ok? And his attempt to steal a presidential election was a-ok?
You're 100% pathetic.
Not simply handing money to corrupt foreign governments is a good thing. You've never explained why his conversation with Zelensky wasn't "a-ok". I'd bet a million dollars you've never even seen the conversation. You've been told to pretend to be outraged about it so that's what you do. Zelensky himself said there was no quid pro quo.
Trump didn't try to "steal" anything. It's hilarious that you know full well that Democrats stole the election and you still have the gall to pretend to be outraged by Trump contesting the results. But then, you were told to pretend to be outraged so you that's what you do.
Pathetic would be an improvement for you.
trump used us public funds to extort a personal political favor from a foreign nation.
Perfect example of non-persuasion. You wave away his impeachments with the simple word "political," without telling us WHY his conversation with Zelensky was a-ok? And his attempt to steal a presidential election was a-ok?
You're 100% pathetic.
Not simply handing money to corrupt foreign governments is a good thing. You've never explained why his conversation with Zelensky wasn't "a-ok". I'd bet a million dollars you've never even seen the conversation. You've been told to pretend to be outraged about it so that's what you do. Zelensky himself said there was no quid pro quo.
Trump didn't try to "steal" anything. It's hilarious that you know full well that Democrats stole the election and you still have the gall to pretend to be outraged by Trump contesting the results. But then, you were told to pretend to be outraged so you that's what you do.
Pathetic would be an improvement for you.
Of course, you're still not defending. You're still not explaining.
Trump put personal political assistance in a conversation about military assistance (or it could have been ANY other government concern). No, 100% unacceptable. And while I certainly can't trust the accuracy or honesty of your statement about Zelensky's description, it doesn't matter. Any American knew what he was doing in that conversation. It was indefensible, and you're OK with it.
Ditto, of course, the election. Since it's one of the most crystal clear aspects, do tell why you think that Trump EXPLICITLY asking GA government officials for 11,000 votes was OK? Why that one sentence, ALONE, isn't grounds for removal ?
Not simply handing money to corrupt foreign governments is a good thing. You've never explained why his conversation with Zelensky wasn't "a-ok". I'd bet a million dollars you've never even seen the conversation. You've been told to pretend to be outraged about it so that's what you do. Zelensky himself said there was no quid pro quo.
Trump didn't try to "steal" anything. It's hilarious that you know full well that Democrats stole the election and you still have the gall to pretend to be outraged by Trump contesting the results. But then, you were told to pretend to be outraged so you that's what you do.
Pathetic would be an improvement for you.
trump used us public funds to extort a personal political favor from a foreign nation.
is that simple enough for you?
So in your tiny mind if Biden robs a bank and Trump asks the local police to look into it he's asking the cops to do him a "personal political favor"??
Not simply handing money to corrupt foreign governments is a good thing. You've never explained why his conversation with Zelensky wasn't "a-ok". I'd bet a million dollars you've never even seen the conversation. You've been told to pretend to be outraged about it so that's what you do. Zelensky himself said there was no quid pro quo.
Trump didn't try to "steal" anything. It's hilarious that you know full well that Democrats stole the election and you still have the gall to pretend to be outraged by Trump contesting the results. But then, you were told to pretend to be outraged so you that's what you do.
Pathetic would be an improvement for you.
Of course, you're still not defending. You're still not explaining.
Trump put personal political assistance in a conversation about military assistance (or it could have been ANY other government concern). No, 100% unacceptable. And while I certainly can't trust the accuracy or honesty of your statement about Zelensky's description, it doesn't matter. Any American knew what he was doing in that conversation. It was indefensible, and you're OK with it.
Ditto, of course, the election. Since it's one of the most crystal clear aspects, do tell why you think that Trump EXPLICITLY asking GA government officials for 11,000 votes was OK? Why that one sentence, ALONE, isn't grounds for removal ?
You're confusing your leftist buddies with "any American". Read the transcript of the call and pretend Biden is Trump. Your outrage will magically disappear. There was no quid pro quo any where to be found in the transcript.
That "one sentence" is the only part of the call you're aware. As always you're completely ignorant of the context. You're also thinking like a Democrat so you first instinct is crime. Not everyone behaves like you do.
We weren't given 7 billion names to choose from we were given TWO. Trump, for all his many faults, is head and shoulders better than Biden.
Trump didn't "ignore" the pandemic. You're lying.
Democrats absolutely cheated in the 2020 election. The media tampering alone is enough to make a rational claim that the election was stolen. But there's ample evidence of fraud as well and the truth will come out.
We weren't given 7 billion names to choose from we were given TWO. Trump, for all his many faults, is head and shoulders better than Biden.
Trump didn't "ignore" the pandemic. You're lying.
Democrats absolutely cheated in the 2020 election. The media tampering alone is enough to make a rational claim that the election was stolen. But there's ample evidence of fraud as well and the truth will come out.
. . . in about two weeks!
The evidence is already available. You're a cultist though so you wouldn't believe it even if Joe Biden himself told you it was rigged.
trump used us public funds to extort a personal political favor from a foreign nation.
is that simple enough for you?
So in your tiny mind if Biden robs a bank and Trump asks the local police to look into it he's asking the cops to do him a "personal political favor"??
Geez you are naive. Shockingly.
No serious person thinks Joe Biden did anything illegal in Ukraine.
trump didn’t actually want an investigation. He just wanted the Ukrainians to ANNOUNCE an investigation, so trump could campaign on it. no actual investigation was required.
So in your tiny mind if Biden robs a bank and Trump asks the local police to look into it he's asking the cops to do him a "personal political favor"??
Geez you are naive. Shockingly.
No serious person thinks Joe Biden did anything illegal in Ukraine.
trump didn’t actually want an investigation. He just wanted the Ukrainians to ANNOUNCE an investigation, so trump could campaign on it. no actual investigation was required.
No serious person agrees with you on anything.
You're a mind reader now too eh? You have no idea what Trump was thinking. You haven't even read the transcript of the call.
No serious person thinks Joe Biden did anything illegal in Ukraine.
trump didn’t actually want an investigation. He just wanted the Ukrainians to ANNOUNCE an investigation, so trump could campaign on it. no actual investigation was required.
No serious person agrees with you on anything.
You're a mind reader now too eh? You have no idea what Trump was thinking. You haven't even read the transcript of the call.
well honestly if your argument is that trump believed the 'crowdstrike' hypothesis he was pitching to Zelensky, then you are arguing trump is the dumbest most naive most idiotic president in the history of these united states. Is that your argument? Maybe you are onto something here.
Also, trump's ambassador to the EU, sondland, says trump made it perfectly clear to his people that an announcement of an investigation was all he wanted, not an actual investigation. but you, in all your magnificent naivite, trust trump. You trust trump.
basically the only people in the world you take the word of are trump and putin. Tells you how bad a judge of character you are. Two of the most proven liars on the planet and those are the two people you trust to tell you the truth. Geez.
You're a mind reader now too eh? You have no idea what Trump was thinking. You haven't even read the transcript of the call.
well honestly if your argument is that trump believed the 'crowdstrike' hypothesis he was pitching to Zelensky, then you are arguing trump is the dumbest most naive most idiotic president in the history of these united states. Is that your argument? Maybe you are onto something here.
Also, trump's ambassador to the EU, sondland, says trump made it perfectly clear to his people that an announcement of an investigation was all he wanted, not an actual investigation. but you, in all your magnificent naivite, trust trump. You trust trump.
basically the only people in the world you take the word of are trump and putin. Tells you how bad a judge of character you are. Two of the most proven liars on the planet and those are the two people you trust to tell you the truth. Geez.
You say "sondland, says trump made it perfectly clear to his people that an announcement of an investigation was all he wanted, not an actual investigation"
Yet the testimony doesn't say that. You're just wishing out loud and regurgitating lies.
GOLDMAN: You never heard anyone say that they really wanted them to do the investigations. SONDLAND: I didn’t hear either way.
Assuming everyone you don't like is always lying is idiotic.
Of course, you're still not defending. You're still not explaining.
Trump put personal political assistance in a conversation about military assistance (or it could have been ANY other government concern). No, 100% unacceptable. And while I certainly can't trust the accuracy or honesty of your statement about Zelensky's description, it doesn't matter. Any American knew what he was doing in that conversation. It was indefensible, and you're OK with it.
Ditto, of course, the election. Since it's one of the most crystal clear aspects, do tell why you think that Trump EXPLICITLY asking GA government officials for 11,000 votes was OK? Why that one sentence, ALONE, isn't grounds for removal ?
You're confusing your leftist buddies with "any American". Read the transcript of the call and pretend Biden is Trump. Your outrage will magically disappear. There was no quid pro quo any where to be found in the transcript.
That "one sentence" is the only part of the call you're aware. As always you're completely ignorant of the context. You're also thinking like a Democrat so you first instinct is crime. Not everyone behaves like you do.
President Donald Trump repeatedly pushed for Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, and his son, Hunter, during a July 25 phone call, according to a transcript of the conversatio...
"Context." What dishonest sycophants feebly use to distract from both explicit AND contextual bad behavior. The transcript clearly has both.
President Zelenskyy: ....I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost. ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.
The President: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.
President Zelenskyy: blah, blah...
The President: Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that’s really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what’s happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it… It sounds horrible to me.
You're confusing your leftist buddies with "any American". Read the transcript of the call and pretend Biden is Trump. Your outrage will magically disappear. There was no quid pro quo any where to be found in the transcript.
That "one sentence" is the only part of the call you're aware. As always you're completely ignorant of the context. You're also thinking like a Democrat so you first instinct is crime. Not everyone behaves like you do.
"Context." What dishonest sycophants feebly use to distract from both explicit AND contextual bad behavior. The transcript clearly has both.
President Zelenskyy: ....I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost. ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.
The President: I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.
President Zelenskyy: blah, blah...
The President: Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that’s really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what’s happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it… It sounds horrible to me.
And I simply can't leave out:
"The President: Well, she’s going to go through some things. I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it."
100% threatening mob crap coming from the President of the United States regarding a U.S. career diplomat and ambassador.
Quite simply, you despise us non-Trumpers because we see your stupidity, and it hurts your feelings. We despise you because not only are you WILLING to have that man as your president, but you vehemently defend him beyond all reason. And in doing so, help possibly destroy this country. Real patriots.
Democrats absolutely cheated in the 2020 election. The media tampering alone is enough to make a rational claim that the election was stolen. But there's ample evidence of fraud as well and the truth will come out.
Yes, the Democrats cheated. There was no way Trump could have won because the fix was in.
In fact, the only way Trump could have won would be if the New York Post was allowed to tweet about Hunter's laptop.
For the Biden supporters - Legit question here - How do you feel about his ongoing cognitive decline? From the recent Easter footage and the 'phantom' handshake and confusion around the stage it seems like he's completely lost it.
trump used us public funds to extort a personal political favor from a foreign nation.
is that simple enough for you?
So in your tiny mind if Biden robs a bank and Trump asks the local police to look into it he's asking the cops to do him a "personal political favor"??
If Trump tells the local police that they won't get any new squad cars unless they look into Biden's role in the robbery then, yes, that's a personal political favor. It's also called "extortion".
I believe the FBI is corrupt and it's been proven that they act politically. Crowdstrike decommissioned more than 140 servers, removed and reinstalled all software, including the operating systems, for more than 180 computers, and rebuilt at least 11 servers according to court documents filed by the DNC in 2018 They had all the data provided it to the FBI who promptly ignored or destroyed anything that would be politically damaging to HRC.
No rational person trusts the James Comey's or Peter Stzrok's of the world.