DJT indicted on four counts related to January 6

Noyankee’s logic on various types of malfeasance and the definition of communism …

all llamas have hair.

ferrets have hair.

therefore ferrets are llamas.

His logic on other points is better or worse at times, but the baseline is instructive.

you still supporting this clown you brainwashed bigots?

People in a cult, never realise they are in a cult

All communists eliminate the vote.

Democrats, after 6 nauseating years of trying, have now eliminated the vote.

therefore, democrats are now communists.

Liberal logic is much worse.

all llamas have hair.

ferrets have hair.

therefore Trump is racist.

There was every reason to suspect "Russian Collusion." Google Paul Manafort. Remember those "Conspiracy against the United States" charges and subsequent guilty plea?

And don't forget this gem (source: PBS): "In January (2019), Manafort’s defense attorneys accidentally unsealed court documents that revealed he had shared Trump campaign polling data with a business associate with Russian ties. The revelation could support possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, the issue at the center of Mueller’s special counsel investigation. But Manafort’s trials have so far not offered a definitive answer to questions about collusion, including what happened at the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with a Russian lawyer promising damaging information on Hillary Clinton."

Even Barr, while serving as AG, wrote that “the Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’”

Plus, a bipartisan Senate committee did conclude that Russia interfered in the election with the goal of helping the Trump campaign and hurting the Clinton campaign.

This is all public information. And collusion, or conspiracy, is VERY difficult to prove.

It's late old guy - have your last Ensure for the day and hit the sack.

BTW here's a pic of the sack of sh!t you spend some much time defending but claim you dont support. I am calling this one 'Orange Man sad face'

reddit.com

https://i.redd.it/xsd57znaxbib1.jpg

Link:www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2...

If logicians were to put their heads together and identify a fallacy of the undistributed middle, they could instruct others to recognize such egregious errors and in turn prevent a whole heckuva lot of weak reasoning. If only …

Try

A high percentage of those unwilling to disavow David Duke are racist.

Think of those who, upon seeing supporters chanting “the J**s will not replace us,” fail to condemn such acts. A high percentage are racist.

And many other things (prospective tenant investigations, CP5, etc.). But this still doesn’t descend to the level of indicating that he’s a racist according to the standards of deductive logic.

I’m comfortable looking at all that and considering it to be items to take into consideration as part of the overall picture. Some Liberals will err and think his history automatically and irrefutably postions him as a racist.

I, however, never suggested the general premise that no Liberals are as bad at thinking as you are.

I know you’re using “every reason” colloquially, but I’ll qualify it as “sufficient reason” (to suspect, investigate, etc. If not to indict, convict).

we could parse a lot of words and examine a lot of data, but who likes the eye test as a way of supplementing evidence and making it recognizable.

Picture a dude like Trump looming over HRC to boorishly make his presence felt in a debate.

Picture him pushing his way past the PM of Montenegro at a summit of world leaders in a ham-fisted way f trying to look like an alpha by picking on (in world powercterms) the one of the smallest guys in the room.

Now look at him side by side with Putin. His deferential demeanor juxtaposed with Putin8s self-satisfied smirk proves nothing, but those who don’t consider that incongruity worthy of some pause are kidding themselves.

Breaking laws (read the indictment) was still a crime in 2020 and continues to be in 2023. Your post is just incoherent diarrhea.

I think you'd do well to study the fate of would-be challengers to power in authoritarian regimes like Stalinist Russia. Mere potential challengers to power got show trials, followed by immediate execution. Actual challengers to power-- failed coup-makers--, of whom there would have been very few, got summary execution.

Trump, a failed political challenger to US constitutional authority, is getting exactly the treatment one would expect in a country like the US-- and, better, in fact, than many people on the left throughout US history got for their trouble.

Trump walks freely among us, his right to speak on matters unrelated to details of the legal cases against him unrestricted, and his legal defense team permitted to negotiate on matters related to his cases, such as trial dates, without interference.

The best defense anyone could make of Trump is that he was, at all times, just doing politics, but in a way he thought was required, given the unscrupulousness of his opponents. And if this is true, then he is simply a political loser. His gambit failed and his unscrupulous enemies have won. And in failing, he has given his opponent more than they need to remove him from the scene, all without troubling the rule of law as it's clearly written. Unlike in Stalinist Russian, or anywhere like it, they can easily afford him the same due process as any other citizen. His failure was THAT bad.

If Trump were in jail right now and facing an imminent execution date, your "communism" talk would be proportional. As it is, he still has all of his rights and you still have your vote. You just might want to consider getting together with your friends and using it to elect another member of your still legal party.

All politics is self interest and Trump will act in my self interest. so I will vote for him.

Never forget Helsinki...

Image:www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=11...

What a great summary of the stone cold loser 👏

This is their alpha

Challenging Q for you - if trump ever committed a crime would you spot it?

Hi Don! Glad you turned off the caps lock key.

These lawyers and other morons who fell on the sword for Trump for free, or perhaps thinking they would later profit, are profoundly stupid. And to think there were so many others in line who would happily do the same, but were lucky not to have had the chance to be involved.