Russian soldiers are so desperate to find out why they are needlessly in Ukraine that they are killing civilians for their cellphones. That seems to be their only way to stop receiving Putin propaganda on their mandatory Putinphones.
-
20
-
carmine9 wrote:
hani saleem wrote:
Good article here - describes the delusion driving Putin's madness from a source close to the Kremlin.
You need to be able to recognize propaganda for what it is.
It's not that hard
Sorry I hurt your feelings - here is some Pro-Russian drivel to make you feel better-
https://www.youtube.com/c/FoxNews
and for comparison some actual journalism
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/04/world/europe/bucha-ukraine-bodies.html
21 -
Cold War warrior2 wrote:
Jeremy Scahill is hard left. He hates Putin. What he hate even more than Putin is Putin's ignorant war. And, you support him. Oops.
20 -
You are moving away form the reason Scahill's name came up. A poster denied U.S. kills Africans on a regular basis in Africa. Did you read Scahill's recent article in The Intercept? Anyone who read Scahill would take away from his writings more than a disdain for Putin.
03 -
Cold War warrior2 wrote:
You are moving away form the reason Scahill's name came up. A poster denied U.S. kills Africans on a regular basis in Africa. Did you read Scahill's recent article in The Intercept? Anyone who read Scahill would take away from his writings more than a disdain for Putin.
Who denied anything?
I simply asked if it is done on a daily basis then show some evidence,thought it would be pretty easy to be honest
10 -
To be clear, I have no idea what Scahill believes in regard to the mushy center-left views in U.S. such as his opinions on homosexuals in the military, trans in the military etc. Maybe or maybe not Scahill agrees with Anderson Cooper on those issues. Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon and Wolf Blitzer are cheerleading U.S. direct involvement in Ukraine. Scahill is 100% opposed to U.S. arming Ukrainians. A.O.C. and Ted Cruz have co-sponsored legislation. It is possible for Scahill and I to agree on some issues while Scahill may agree with Anderson Cooper on other issues.
04 -
are you not the guy wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
The past?
You don't know that America is killing kids in Somalia and Syria and Iraq as we speak?
If you condemn Russia buy say zip about USA/Israel you are a phony
Sorry I said past. I agree with you. You are 100% correct.
If people are killing people elsewhere it makes it right for Russians to kill right now.
I have an original thought my friend Carmine.
Because the US is killing people and Russia is killing people it is ok for an invading force to come to our neighborhood and kill us and our families us don’t you think?
I want to get your opinion on this because you are so much smarter than all of these idiots here.
10 -
#1808
This post was removed.
-
Cold War warrior2 wrote:
To be clear, I have no idea what Scahill believes in regard to ... HARD-left views...
FIXED your lie about center-left. Hard-left. Not extreme-left. You, on the other hand, are extreme-right, while wearing a tinfoil hat, and trolling to earn Putin Rubles.
31 -
OH...TX wrote:
are you not the guy wrote:
I have an original thought my friend Carmine.
Because the US is killing people and Russia is killing people it is ok for an invading force to come to our neighborhood and kill us and our families us don’t you think?
I want to get your opinion on this because you are so much smarter than all of these idiots here.
It's probably best to avoid getting into the details on who Carmine thinks should be killed. He's got a bit of a "final solution" kink.
What do you mean? I am trying to keep up with his brilliance.
10 -
Putin's soldiers have also starved Ukraine pets to death and shot them dead.
30 -
Colin Bomba Harris wrote:
Yes, you did say that the bodies were fake and/or the satellite images were fake. This isn't Russia, and double-speak doesn't pass for analysis. When you type a rhetorical question like "Why did they keep these pictures in a drawer for more than 20 days, before publishing them?" and then double down with "pretty odd that it took 3 weeks for those images to emerge" and then follow up saying that the NY Times has tried to pass fake satellite images in the past, you are absolutely stating your position that the bodies and/or the satellites are fake. That's how English-speaking adults will understand what you typed.
Your rhetorical question was stupid, lame, and deserving of insult because a perfectly reasonable answer was easily provided for it. You need further classes in the use and drafting of rhetorical questions.
Your stupid comment about "pretty odd that it took 3 weeks for those images to emerge" was previously explained to you, above. It sailed over your head, and now you look like more of a troll.
My insults were fine, fitting, and you deserved them all. You and your sh!thole countrymen /comrades well deserve all the scorn, derision and insults that are coming your way for the next few decades.
Man, how can you lie so blatantly? You quote my post, you bold some words in it, than like it was nothing, you claim that I have said something completely different. This is unbelievable.
You combine two different posts, two different statements, I wrote in regard to two different claims.
You must be really stupid.
My first statement was in a form of a question - Why did they keep it ...
When you say "it was explained to me", what exactly you take for explanation? A post on LR forum by you, or some other blood thirsty lunatic. Your stupid guess is just as good as anybodies. It is not explanation, not a valid one, though it could be correct after all, no matter how unlikely. Something may look reasonable, but still be completely wrong. Can you understand that simple truth?
Further, you based "explanation" on assumption (unlikely to be correct) that NY Times did not previously ask for satelite imagery, and even if they had it looked at, they did not spot dead bodies because they were looking for something else. Effectively, you called upon NYT authority to substantiate claim about authenticity of images, although nobody disputed it.
Only extremely stupid person would do something like that.
On your nonsense I responded with explanation of why proposed "explanation" is improbable, although not necessarily wrong. I should have guessed that your brain is too undeveloped your to comprehend. Now I know it is.
I mention credibility of NYT only to remind you that you should call on known liars as support for credibility of claims in matters they were proven not to be credible. If you think that fact, NYT not being credible in matters involving satelite imagery to justify going into war, indirectly questions validity of imagery currently in question, it is your problem.
You have no idea what my country is and who my "comrades" are. Feel free to crawl back to your shed, continue mating in family, it would not be fair your offsprings to be any smarter than you are.
04 -
Putin's soldiers are forcibly taking Ukrainian women back home to Russian "filtration camps". These camps are essentially Russian captive sex-slave prisons. The Soviet Union stated them after WWII. And Russia used them during the Chechnya war.
10 -
This is getting ugly:
05 -
NaturalNewsBlogs.
Conspiracy Level: Tin Foil Hat
Pseudo-Science Level: Quackery"Overall, we rate NaturalNewsBlogs an extreme right biased Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy website that also publishes pseudoscience. This source is associated with Natural News, which is one of the most discredited sources on the internet."
60 -
Let's really get to the bottom of this r wrote:
This is getting ugly:
"Every story I’ve ever seen from Natural News has been, at the very least, wildly speculative. Often, the stories are filled with paranoid ravings."
70 -
#1817
This post was removed.
-
Not So Good Wigins wrote:
Former US arms inspector Scott Ritter cites a reported comment by a senior Biden Administration official which sums up the current policy, such as it is: “The only end game now is the end of Putin regime. Until then, all the time Putin stays, [Russia] will be a pariah state that will never be welcomed back into the community of nations.”This Scott Ritter fellow seems like a good man. I'll be sure to buy him a beer if I ever get the chance. Again, despite your claims to the contrary, RUSSIA CHOSE THIS PATH and has nobody to blame but themselves.
This seems like a good time to point out that former US arms inspector Scott Ritter went on to be convicted of trying to rape children and served time in prison for it before his career at Russia Today and is literally on the Russian payroll. Interesting choice of sources by C9.
20 -
#1819
This post was removed.
-
hani saleem wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
You need to be able to recognize propaganda for what it is.
It's not that hard
Sorry I hurt your feelings - here is some Pro-Russian drivel to make you feel better-
https://www.youtube.com/c/FoxNews
and for comparison some actual journalism
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/04/world/europe/bucha-ukraine-bodies.html
Your mindless repetition of Western propaganda does not hurt my feelings.
It does hurt our society.
How many times in the past 20 years has the NY Times lied to help push a war?
Too many to count.
When will you snap out of it?
01
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun