agenda wrote:
If you refuse to watch the results of the audit report being delivered to the AZ sentate you should not be participating in this discussion.
If you know nothing about how elections are run, you shouldn't be allowed to conduct an election audit and make normal things sound suspicious simply because you don't understand them.
So, the group the GOP hired using conservative donations found nothing that would alter anything, except the margin of victory for Biden, and the conservatives who were duped and robbed of their money by the same republican law makers still aren't prepared to move on?
wellwellwell3holesintheground wrote:
So, the group the GOP hired using conservative donations found nothing that would alter anything, except the margin of victory for Biden, and the conservatives who were duped and robbed of their money by the same republican law makers still aren't prepared to move on?
kind of awesome that the right wing dopes gave the ninjas $5.7 million.
Although scary in the long run - using this sort of thing as fund raising tools.
wellwellwell3holesintheground wrote:
So, the group the GOP hired using conservative donations found nothing that would alter anything, except the margin of victory for Biden, and the conservatives who were duped and robbed of their money by the same republican law makers still aren't prepared to move on?
Trump could pee on the heads of his voters and not only would they believe him if he said it was rain, they would pay him for the right to take a drink.
wellwellwell3holesintheground wrote:
So, the group the GOP hired using conservative donations found nothing that would alter anything, except the margin of victory for Biden, and the conservatives who were duped and robbed of their money by the same republican law makers still aren't prepared to move on?
This. And the fact that Trump and the RNC took in $250M in Nov and Dec, from these rubes, after the election. Fleecing the selfish, by the most selfish.
Lol the Trump election fraud experts spent $19,000 per vote GIVEN TO BIDEN. LOLOLOL
Pull the other one wrote:
agip wrote:
I'm sure you are not at all interested in facts, but here's the uber-right wing WSJ editorial board saying you are an idiot to believe anything Trump says about fraud. They go through point by point all the accusations you and trumpists are making.
Yea, well WSJ and Fox can no longer be trusted because they're just RINO's and part MSM! (I don't know if that's really sarcasm because there will be at least one person who will actually try to make that argument)
The wingnuts (which is to say, the GOP base) all graduated to OAN and Newsmax because the news wing of Fox (not to be mistaken for the Carlson Hannity propaganda wing) occasionally reports facts and it hurts their little feelings.
Pull the other one wrote:
agenda wrote:
If you refuse to watch the results of the audit report being delivered to the AZ sentate you should not be participating in this discussion.
If you know nothing about how elections are run, you shouldn't be allowed to conduct an election audit and make normal things sound suspicious simply because you don't understand them.
You disgust me
Pround Republican wrote:
Pull the other one wrote:
If you know nothing about how elections are run, you shouldn't be allowed to conduct an election audit and make normal things sound suspicious simply because you don't understand them.
You disgust me
Competency and logic disgust you?
Raggedman wrote:
Pround Republican wrote:
You disgust me
Competency and logic disgust you?
You have enough logic to refute all of the evidence of election fraud? How about the thousands of signed affidavits?
Yeah, you disgust me.
Pround Republican wrote:
You have enough logic to refute all of the evidence of election fraud? How about the thousands of signed affidavits?
You should really contribute to this guy's Go Fund Me campaign. It looks like he is determined to get to the truth.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/americons-for-justice?qid=1a9971ca023e97437e408d88e0f928ccRaddison wrote:
Pround Republican wrote:
You have enough logic to refute all of the evidence of election fraud? How about the thousands of signed affidavits?
You should really contribute to this guy's Go Fund Me campaign. It looks like he is determined to get to the truth.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/americons-for-justice?qid=1a9971ca023e97437e408d88e0f928cc
Please try to be respectful.
BOOM!
Bombshell!
The radical left is running scared 😂
Pround Republican wrote:
Raggedman wrote:
Competency and logic disgust you?
You have enough logic to refute all of the evidence of election fraud? How about the thousands of signed affidavits?
Yeah, you disgust me.
A lot of the signed affidavits just swore that someone else said they saw something, or that the signatory saw something and 'thought' it could have been a problem. That isn't evidence. The first is hearsay and proves no facts. The second is just a suspicion reflecting a bias.
SeattleSilver wrote:
Pround Republican wrote:
You have enough logic to refute all of the evidence of election fraud? How about the thousands of signed affidavits?
Yeah, you disgust me.
A lot of the signed affidavits just swore that someone else said they saw something, or that the signatory saw something and 'thought' it could have been a problem. That isn't evidence. The first is hearsay and proves no facts. The second is just a suspicion reflecting a bias.
Where there's smoke there's fire
Raddison wrote:
Pround Republican wrote:
You have enough logic to refute all of the evidence of election fraud? How about the thousands of signed affidavits?
You should really contribute to this guy's Go Fund Me campaign. It looks like he is determined to get to the truth.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/americons-for-justice?qid=1a9971ca023e97437e408d88e0f928cc
Hilarious
phjtprhiayirhp wrote:
Raddison wrote:
You should really contribute to this guy's Go Fund Me campaign. It looks like he is determined to get to the truth.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/americons-for-justice?qid=1a9971ca023e97437e408d88e0f928ccHilarious
The type of person to find this funny is the type of personal who hates democracy. Try again, buddy.
Very telling that no one has yet to debunk the clear evidence presented in this thread...
Proud Republican wrote:
Very telling that no one has yet to debunk the clear evidence presented in this thread...
What clear evidence?
All I ever see are vague generalities about trucks delivering boxes to the counting centres late at night, boxes stored under tables, numbers changing on the TV screens and of course the affidavits. There are probably tens of thousands of Americans who would sign an affidavit stating the world is flat but that doesn't make it true.
Trump's lower level minions may have been shouting fraud and corruption - and are now getting sued for defamation. But Trump and his associates have been careful to avoid claiming illegal activity. Their tactic has been to find minor irregularities in predominantly Democrat counties and then try to get the entire county disenfranchised. Six ballots were incorrectly handled - therefore we must throw out all 150,000 votes from this county. A tactic that has been thrown out of court every time.
You really are flogging a dead horse.
The Clown Show wrote:
wellwellwell3holesintheground wrote:
So, the group the GOP hired using conservative donations found nothing that would alter anything, except the margin of victory for Biden, and the conservatives who were duped and robbed of their money by the same republican law makers still aren't prepared to move on?
Trump could pee on the heads of his voters and not only would they believe him if he said it was rain, they would pay him for the right to take a drink.
Hahaha, scary but true.