physics defiant wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
Everything I wrote is correct. Your distinctions add no meaningful value, but only serve to obfuscate your omission:
- I wrote "whereabouts failure" (singular) while you wrote "whereabouts failures" (plural). In the code we can see how WADA describes a singular whereabouts failure: "7.1.2 Results management in relation to a potential Whereabouts Failure (a filing failure or a missed test) ... "
- I also wrote: "This could be three missed tests, or two, or one, or zero."
- For "tampering", I paraphrased the Voltare statement, which also did not use the word "fraudulent" rather than looking up the article in the code: "The accusation regarding alleged/attempted tampering (article 2.5) concerns an explanation that was given in the results management process regarding a possible Whereabouts Failure"
- Since "fraudulent" is in the article, it is implicit
It was not unexpected you accuse me of "defending the accused cheat", simply for acknowledging that he was provisionally suspended, under articles 2.4 and 2.5 (and not 2.1 or 2.2), and providing another possibility, that of one or more filing failures, that you failed to mention in your response to El Keniano. This is how you troll.
Weak, Gary.
Troll.