Armstronglivs wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
Sure, “doper” has one meaning for me.
And another meaning for WADA.
And surely another meaning for you.
I know what it means for me, and what it means for WADA.
If you find “doper” in the CAS report, I’m happy to discuss what they meant.
A "doper" has only one meaning. It appears you are yet to discover it. But we do know that someone who has committed "an intentional ADRV" (CAS) is not a doper in your books. No one ever is.
Only an uneducated non reader would think the word doper has only one meaning.
And you know the comment in the rules on 10.2.3 overrides your grossly simplistic interpretation.But you know this and continue to lie.