As usual, you have no clue what you are talking about, are wrong, and have been misled by the people on Twitter who you rely on to form your opinions.
Few cases brought by Trump and his supporters in Georgia (or elsewhere) were actually based on factual allegations of voting fraud. Most were cases claiming procedural defects in the election. Of the "fact" based cases in Georgia:
------------------------
Boland v. Raffensberger, Case No. 2020-CV-343018 (Fulton County, GA) was dismissed for, amongst other reasons:
"Even if credited, the Complaint’s factual allegations do not plausibly support his claims. The allegations in the Complaint rest on speculation rather than duly pled facts. They cannot, as a matter of law, sustain this contest."
"Count I, which alleges that 20,312 people may have voted illegally in Georgia, relies upon a YouTube video which purportedly is based upon United States Postal Service mail forwarding information."
---------------------------------
Wood v. Raffensberger, Case No. 20-cv-5155-TCB was dismissed for, amongst other reason:
Allegations that Dominion voting machines switched votes from Trump to Biden were "astonishingly speculative"
--------------------------------
So Trump's lawyers do what you do -- they just make stuff up facts and declare victory. That works on a message board, but in court it never works, because the judge or fact finder is legally compelled to analyze what is being alleged. That's why Sidney Powell is being (1) indicted and (2) disbarred.