the point of all this talk from me on HRC is that trump and the GOP told so many lies about her that even the 'good republicans' have come to believe them.
I realized in 2016 that reality would have little to do with GOP votes and that they preferred to be misled because that got them all riled up and they LIKED being all riled up.
And also, she does inspire a pure distilled loathing from right wingers and I've never quite understood why. And no one has written anything that explains it well to me. Probably something about her yells 'phony' and 'scripted' to them.
But mostly it's just the GOP lies wormed in and took hold. I mean Benghazi for example. FFS.
Yes, all dislike is not created equal. Do I think that my relative dislike of Hillary makes sense? Of course. And do I think that there are millions of Hillary-hating mouth breathers who's reasons don't hold much, if any, water? Of course.
Hillary dodges questions on latest Durham findings…use Google and click without your rose colored glasses on. Hint: you won’t see it on CNN, agip’s favorite source—-lol!!!!
She’s a lying crook who duped many stupid posters on this thread. If Trump were accused of exactly the same things, it’d be posted daily and considered concrete evidence. Gosh you dumplings are soooooo dumb.
Yes, it's a con. The business model is not, "Ask supporters for money". He's already doing that without a SPAC.
This business is supposedly a media company. But the company doesn't really exist yet. There is no product. There is no TV network. No real social media platform. Nothing.
They say they will launch an app soon, but it's certain to fail. You can't launch a social network without the "social" part. You need a critical mass of users putting their digital lives on a new platform that barely exists. If it's not as good as FaceBook and Twitter, even the most dedicated Trumper won't go for it. And you just can't build that over night.
Sure you can build a twitter clone overnight... many exist already.
Investors know what they're meme-ing into so it's not a con.
have to say this is heartening. SF voters rejected stupid lefty priorities in education like renaming high schools and eliminating 'test-in' programs so leaders can hammer down the Asian American kids who study hard.
NYT: In a recall election fueled by pandemic angst and anger, San Francisco voters ousted three members of the Board of Education on Tuesday, closing a bitter chapter in the city’s politics that was rife with infighting, accusations of racism and a flurry of lawsuits. More than 70 percent of voters supported the recall of each member when initial results were released just before 9 p.m. Pacific time, and one of the board members conceded defeat. Those votes made up about one-quarter of registered voters in the city, and turnout was not expected to be considerably higher. The vote stripped the members, Alison Collins, Gabriela López and Faauuga Moliga, of their positions on the seven-person board, which Ms. Lopez served as president. They will be replaced by members chosen by Mayor London Breed. “It’s the people rising up in revolt in San Francisco and saying it’s unacceptable to abandon your responsibility to educate our children,” said Siva Raj, a San Francisco parent of public school students who helped lead the signature campaign to put the recall election on the ballot. The recall was a victory for parents who were angered that the district spent time deciding whether to rename a third of its schools last year instead of focusing on reopening them. It also appeared to be a demonstration of Asian American electoral power, a galvanizing moment for Chinese voters in particular who turned out in unusually large numbers for the election. In echoes of debates in other cities, many Chinese voters were incensed when the school board introduced a lottery admission system for Lowell High School, the district’s most prestigious institution, abolishing requirements primarily based on grades and test scores. A judge last year ruled that the board had violated procedures in making the change.
Yes, it's a con. The business model is not, "Ask supporters for money". He's already doing that without a SPAC.
This business is supposedly a media company. But the company doesn't really exist yet. There is no product. There is no TV network. No real social media platform. Nothing.
They say they will launch an app soon, but it's certain to fail. You can't launch a social network without the "social" part. You need a critical mass of users putting their digital lives on a new platform that barely exists. If it's not as good as FaceBook and Twitter, even the most dedicated Trumper won't go for it. And you just can't build that over night.
Sure you can build a twitter clone overnight... many exist already.
Investors know what they're meme-ing into so it's not a con.
You can not build a twitter clone overnight. You can't even do it in a year, no matter how much you are willing to spend.
It has to scale to millions of users. It has to match Twitter's functionality. And most importantly, it has to reach a critical mass of users. Otherwise, you can't make money.
I'm not sure what you mean by "Investors know what they're meme-ing". If you are saying that everyone knows it's a ponzi scheme and they are just hoping to get out at the right time, then I might tend to agree.
Yes, all dislike is not created equal. Do I think that my relative dislike of Hillary makes sense? Of course. And do I think that there are millions of Hillary-hating mouth breathers who's reasons don't hold much, if any, water? Of course.
Hillary dodges questions on latest Durham findings…use Google and click without your rose colored glasses on. Hint: you won’t see it on CNN, agip’s favorite source—-lol!!!!
She’s a lying crook who duped many stupid posters on this thread. If Trump were accused of exactly the same things, it’d be posted daily and considered concrete evidence. Gosh you dumplings are soooooo dumb.
Durham findings? LOLz... no chud, it's just HIS allegation, nothing else.
You can not build a twitter clone overnight. You can't even do it in a year, no matter how much you are willing to spend.
It has to scale to millions of users. It has to match Twitter's functionality. And most importantly, it has to reach a critical mass of users. Otherwise, you can't make money.
I'm not sure what you mean by "Investors know what they're meme-ing". If you are saying that everyone knows it's a ponzi scheme and they are just hoping to get out at the right time, then I might tend to agree.
You can fork an open source clone pretty quickly. And so what? Raising money for risky projects that could take years to pay off is why capitalism was invented.
It became a meme-stock because people want to see it raise lots of money and see what they do with it for the entertainment value.
You can not build a twitter clone overnight. You can't even do it in a year, no matter how much you are willing to spend.
It has to scale to millions of users. It has to match Twitter's functionality. And most importantly, it has to reach a critical mass of users. Otherwise, you can't make money.
I'm not sure what you mean by "Investors know what they're meme-ing". If you are saying that everyone knows it's a ponzi scheme and they are just hoping to get out at the right time, then I might tend to agree.
You can fork an open source clone pretty quickly. And so what? Raising money for risky projects that could take years to pay off is why capitalism was invented.
It became a meme-stock because people want to see it raise lots of money and see what they do with it for the entertainment value.
Sounds like you agree that it's not a real business. It's only the promise of having a real business some day. That kind of thing is for angel investors or maybe a VC.
If you think you are starting a viable business then you don't dilute your equity by reaching out to the public market on day one.
It's a con. And it's an obvious con. You'd be better off investing in Trump Steaks.
Maybe it's just me. But I find born into privilege less deserving than marrying into privilege. At least the latter takes some efforts, while the former is completely a matter of luck.
More effort? Yes. "Laudable" effort? Nah.
And heck, at worst, who might disgust one more? The wealthy kid at the country club, just doing his or her thing? Or, the gold-digging outsider at the country club straining to find a wealthy spouse ???
If I am a member of the country club, I will be more annoyed by the gold digger. If I am not a club member, I will be more annoyed by the wealthy kids. And I have never considered myself as a gatekeeper of the privileged circle.
Mazars USA, the accounting firm that former President Donald Trump and his businesses have used for years, cut ties with him in stunning fashion, declaring it could no longer vouch for the financial statements it has complied...
Watching President Biden’s Ukraine speech, there’s good news and bad news. The good news is, Biden isn’t drunk. Biden doesn’t drink. The bad news is, Biden isn’t drunk. He just talks that way now. Biden may be as sober as Sunday morning, but he’s as lost as last year’s Easter eggs.
Joe Biden is a mess, and a mess that can't be cleaned up.
This makes Mazars look really bad, like a two-bit accounting firm. If they had issues with the financial statements and financial information the time was WAY LONG AGO to address them. Why would they decide all of a sudden that they can't vouch for the financial statements that THEY signed off on? I wouldn't be surprised if we find out that the truth is Donald Trump fired THEM. He will probably go get Deloitte or Ernst and Young (who offered me a job, LOL). Mazars dropped the ball on this one. When you do reconciliations you find out any discrepancies or irregularities.
Now the truth comes out. No material discrepancies. Mazars was intimidated by NY AG.
Donald Trump on Tuesday night insisted a former Trump Organization accounting firm cut ties with his company over “vicious intimidation tactics” from the New York authorities investigating him. The former president alleged accounting firm Mazars was forced to stop working with his company because of “prosecutorial misconduct” by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is investigating the Trump Organization’s financial dealings. Trump also blamed the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office for the breakup with the company’s long-term accounting firm. “Mazars has been threatened, harassed, and insulted like virtually no other firm has ever been,” Trump said in a lengthy statement. The firm’s “decision to withdraw was clearly a result of the AG’s and DA’s vicious intimidation tactics used—also on other members of the Trump Organization,” he said. “Mazars, who were scared beyond belief, in conversations with us made it clear that they were willing to do or say anything to stop the constant threat which has gone against them for years,” Trump continued. The accounting firm announced it would stop working with the Trump Organization in a Feb. 9 letter made public Monday. In the letter to a Trump Organization lawyer, the firm said the decision was made because it determined the former president’s “Statements of Financial Condition” from 2011 to 2020 were unreliable. A lawyer for Mazars said in the letter that the statements “as a whole” don’t “contain material discrepancies.” Still, “we believe our advice to you to no longer rely upon those financial statements is appropriate,” the letter continued.
Now the truth comes out. No material discrepancies. Mazars was intimidated by NY AG.
Donald Trump on Tuesday night insisted a former Trump Organization accounting firm cut ties with his company over “vicious intimidation tactics” from the New York authorities investigating him. The former president alleged accounting firm Mazars was forced to stop working with his company because of “prosecutorial misconduct” by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is investigating the Trump Organization’s financial dealings. Trump also blamed the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office for the breakup with the company’s long-term accounting firm. “Mazars has been threatened, harassed, and insulted like virtually no other firm has ever been,” Trump said in a lengthy statement. The firm’s “decision to withdraw was clearly a result of the AG’s and DA’s vicious intimidation tactics used—also on other members of the Trump Organization,” he said. “Mazars, who were scared beyond belief, in conversations with us made it clear that they were willing to do or say anything to stop the constant threat which has gone against them for years,” Trump continued. The accounting firm announced it would stop working with the Trump Organization in a Feb. 9 letter made public Monday. In the letter to a Trump Organization lawyer, the firm said the decision was made because it determined the former president’s “Statements of Financial Condition” from 2011 to 2020 were unreliable. A lawyer for Mazars said in the letter that the statements “as a whole” don’t “contain material discrepancies.” Still, “we believe our advice to you to no longer rely upon those financial statements is appropriate,” the letter continued.
wait let me get this straight....Sally believes Trump here?
Good God Salster get a grip on yourself. You can't possibly believe a word trump says on an of this. You have to know that . Don't embarrass yourself by trusting that liar. You yourself say you loathe him.
This makes Mazars look really bad, like a two-bit accounting firm. If they had issues with the financial statements and financial information the time was WAY LONG AGO to address them. Why would they decide all of a sudden that they can't vouch for the financial statements that THEY signed off on? I wouldn't be surprised if we find out that the truth is Donald Trump fired THEM. He will probably go get Deloitte or Ernst and Young (who offered me a job, LOL). Mazars dropped the ball on this one. When you do reconciliations you find out any discrepancies or irregularities.
1/10. Mazars has ALWAYS been a 2-bit accounting firm, contrary to the many times you claimed otherwise. The Big 4 would never touch Trump or anything he's involved in. And likewise, I can guarantee you the fake billionaire would never go to the Big 4 to avoid the embarrassment of being turned down.
Friends of Democrats: UK, France, Norway, Italy, Japan, Australia, Canada, etc.
Judge a person by his friends.
In high-profile call last wk, the Saudi king rejected Biden's plea to boost oil production as elections loom.
"High gas prices will almost certainly be blamed on the party in power...the Saudis are using the oil weapon against Democrats," staffer told me https://t.co/7Hqe9Ybk10
Now the truth comes out. No material discrepancies. Mazars was intimidated by NY AG.
Donald Trump on Tuesday night insisted a former Trump Organization accounting firm cut ties with his company over “vicious intimidation tactics” from the New York authorities investigating him. The former president alleged accounting firm Mazars was forced to stop working with his company because of “prosecutorial misconduct” by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is investigating the Trump Organization’s financial dealings. Trump also blamed the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office for the breakup with the company’s long-term accounting firm. “Mazars has been threatened, harassed, and insulted like virtually no other firm has ever been,” Trump said in a lengthy statement. The firm’s “decision to withdraw was clearly a result of the AG’s and DA’s vicious intimidation tactics used—also on other members of the Trump Organization,” he said. “Mazars, who were scared beyond belief, in conversations with us made it clear that they were willing to do or say anything to stop the constant threat which has gone against them for years,” Trump continued. The accounting firm announced it would stop working with the Trump Organization in a Feb. 9 letter made public Monday. In the letter to a Trump Organization lawyer, the firm said the decision was made because it determined the former president’s “Statements of Financial Condition” from 2011 to 2020 were unreliable. A lawyer for Mazars said in the letter that the statements “as a whole” don’t “contain material discrepancies.” Still, “we believe our advice to you to no longer rely upon those financial statements is appropriate,” the letter continued.
wait let me get this straight....Sally believes Trump here?
Good God Salster get a grip on yourself. You can't possibly believe a word trump says on an of this. You have to know that . Don't embarrass yourself by trusting that liar. You yourself say you loathe him.
Damage control, LOLz... Sally is desperate.
How are those banks going to extend new loans to trump if not even Mazars want to do his books? Answer - they won't. Trump desperately needs to come back to politics to stay afloat. He's nothing without the grift. Seeing the trumps broke and humiliated might be even better than seeing them locked up!