I would agree. Why did the attacker let him call 911? Why did he ask for capitol police? Why the eff does he have a drink in his hand? None of it makes sense.
This is really weird. He let Pelosi call the police? When people were asking why he let Pelosi call the police lefties on here were calling them morons and saying Pelosi called from secret in the bathroom. But you can clearly hear David answering on the phone so he was well aware of what Pelosi was doing. Pelosi does sound like he's talking in code on the phone but then why he is he holding a drink when the police open the door? The guy let Pelosi call the cops and then waited to attack him until the moment the police opened the door?
Not to mention the biggest question I still have do the Pelosi's who are one of the most hated families in America really not have security when Nancy is not there? That is stunning this moron could just break in and not even set off so much of an alarm.
At this point I think this was a setup to try to reinforce the narrative of right wing extremism the Democrats were trying to push right ahead of the midterms and swing the vote in their favor. It probably worked since these things are decided on the margin and so many close seats swung narrowly to the Democrats.
Posters like this will help you understand why Trump was easily able to rake in millions to his Big Lie election fraud fund that he had no intention of spending on Election fraud.
This is really weird. He let Pelosi call the police? When people were asking why he let Pelosi call the police lefties on here were calling them morons and saying Pelosi called from secret in the bathroom. But you can clearly hear David answering on the phone so he was well aware of what Pelosi was doing. Pelosi does sound like he's talking in code on the phone but then why he is he holding a drink when the police open the door? The guy let Pelosi call the cops and then waited to attack him until the moment the police opened the door?
Not to mention the biggest question I still have do the Pelosi's who are one of the most hated families in America really not have security when Nancy is not there? That is stunning this moron could just break in and not even set off so much of an alarm.
At this point I think this was a setup to try to reinforce the narrative of right wing extremism the Democrats were trying to push right ahead of the midterms and swing the vote in their favor. It probably worked since these things are decided on the margin and so many close seats swung narrowly to the Democrats.
Posters like this will help you understand why Trump was easily able to rake in millions to his Big Lie election fraud fund that he had no intention of spending on Election fraud.
So you didn't even attempt to address a single one of my points which I think are fairly reasonable questions.
And obviously the Democrats are not above either suppressing info or pushing narratives to influence elections. They suppressed and lied about Hunters laptop in 2020. And in 2022 they suppressed Biden's classified docs scandal which started a week before the election until after the election. So yes call me skeptical.
Posters like this will help you understand why Trump was easily able to rake in millions to his Big Lie election fraud fund that he had no intention of spending on Election fraud.
So you didn't even attempt to address a single one of my points which I think are fairly reasonable questions.
And obviously the Democrats are not above either suppressing info or pushing narratives to influence elections. They suppressed and lied about Hunters laptop in 2020. And in 2022 they suppressed Biden's classified docs scandal which started a week before the election until after the election. So yes call me skeptical.
Posters like this will help you understand why Trump was easily able to rake in millions to his Big Lie election fraud fund that he had no intention of spending on Election fraud.
So you didn't even attempt to address a single one of my points which I think are fairly reasonable questions.
And obviously the Democrats are not above either suppressing info or pushing narratives to influence elections. They suppressed and lied about Hunters laptop in 2020. And in 2022 they suppressed Biden's classified docs scandal which started a week before the election until after the election. So yes call me skeptical.
It has been explained over and over. he was befriending the guy to get him to calm the eff down.
I had to do this once with some crazy homeless lunatic at a park with my family. You pretend to be their best bud and get them talking. And let them talk. And let them talk more. Then you compliment them. And then they calm down. Just guessing here but it looked like he was calm but then snapped back into his craziness right when the police yelled at him.
So you didn't even attempt to address a single one of my points which I think are fairly reasonable questions.
And obviously the Democrats are not above either suppressing info or pushing narratives to influence elections. They suppressed and lied about Hunters laptop in 2020. And in 2022 they suppressed Biden's classified docs scandal which started a week before the election until after the election. So yes call me skeptical.
It has been explained over and over. he was befriending the guy to get him to calm the eff down.
I had to do this once with some crazy homeless lunatic at a park with my family. You pretend to be their best bud and get them talking. And let them talk. And let them talk more. Then you compliment them. And then they calm down. Just guessing here but it looked like he was calm but then snapped back into his craziness right when the police yelled at him.
I think you're doing some pretty amazing mental gymnastics to think that an 80 year old Pelosi was able to calm this crazy person who remained calm throughout the entire time he and Paul were alone, when Paul called the police, when the police knocked, until we got to the point where the door was open and we see them together and he snaps.
The one hurdle which no one has explained away is how the Pelosi's as I stated one of the most hated families in America, worth $200M ish have no security, not even an alarm system engaged. This alone should raise all kinds of red flags to the story being presented. There have been multiple people who have come forward with incidents of being met by armed guard when going to the Pelosi's when no one was home, so we're to believe Paul was alone at the house when this guy came, plus no alarm system was set?
On one hand we have this story that seems insanely far fetched being true. On the other we have what became politically an incredibly convenient story being staged about a week before the election. Given pretty much every narrative the Democrats pushing since Trump walked down the stairs has been blown up I'm remaining skeptical based on the fact pattern.
At this point I think this was a setup to try to reinforce the narrative of right wing extremism the Democrats were trying to push right ahead of the midterms and swing the vote in their favor. It probably worked since these things are decided on the margin and so many close seats swung narrowly to the Democrats.
There is no hope for Trumpers. Police testimony. Recorded calls. Admission from the perpetrator. Video evidence. Once they've settled on a preferred lie or conspiracy, they will cling to it like a life preserver and nothing can convince them otherwise. The guy could have chainsawed Pelosi's head off and these guys would still be like "It musta been a body double! George Soros and da FBI took da REAL Paul Pelosi to hide on Epstein's island!"
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
It is important to differentiate between conservatives and Trumpers. Conservatism is a legitimate political ethos with pillars such as limited government, low taxes, etc. Trumpism is simply whatever Trump wants at that moment and is complete garbage.
It is important to differentiate between conservatives and Trumpers. Conservatism is a legitimate political ethos with pillars such as limited government, low taxes, etc. Trumpism is simply whatever Trump wants at that moment and is complete garbage.
How in God's name did this incident turn into a screed of "Trumpers"?
At this point I think this was a setup to try to reinforce the narrative of right wing extremism the Democrats were trying to push right ahead of the midterms and swing the vote in their favor. It probably worked since these things are decided on the margin and so many close seats swung narrowly to the Democrats.
There is no hope for Trumpers. Police testimony. Recorded calls. Admission from the perpetrator. Video evidence. Once they've settled on a preferred lie or conspiracy, they will cling to it like a life preserver and nothing can convince them otherwise. The guy could have chainsawed Pelosi's head off and these guys would still be like "It musta been a body double! George Soros and da FBI took da REAL Paul Pelosi to hide on Epstein's island!"
The funny thing is that they are oblivious to how absurd all of their conspiracies are if they actually took the brain power to walk themselves through it.
Like there was a DNC plan where an actor would pretend to be a Trumper online and pretend to break into the home. Yes the home where security was purposely cancelled so to allow this to happen. Then cops would be called and then Pelosi would take one for the team by being bashed in the skull with a hammer. All to swing the election. And the actor would be willing to go to prison and confess to it all.
it is the same with their big lie belief. Fauci covid hoax with big pharma. The Nazi's in Ukraine. You name it.
There is no hope for Trumpers. Police testimony. Recorded calls. Admission from the perpetrator. Video evidence. Once they've settled on a preferred lie or conspiracy, they will cling to it like a life preserver and nothing can convince them otherwise. The guy could have chainsawed Pelosi's head off and these guys would still be like "It musta been a body double! George Soros and da FBI took da REAL Paul Pelosi to hide on Epstein's island!"
The funny thing is that they are oblivious to how absurd all of their conspiracies are if they actually took the brain power to walk themselves through it.
Like there was a DNC plan where an actor would pretend to be a Trumper online and pretend to break into the home. Yes the home where security was purposely cancelled so to allow this to happen. Then cops would be called and then Pelosi would take one for the team by being bashed in the skull with a hammer. All to swing the election. And the actor would be willing to go to prison and confess to it all.
it is the same with their big lie belief. Fauci covid hoax with big pharma. The Nazi's in Ukraine. You name it.
Effen idiots.
You say this sarcastically, but I’m waiting for Rojo to start a new thread with this exact premise. Letsrun thrives on lies and conspiracies, not running news.
1. Never claimed no hammer was found. Yes you did. See page 2-post 25, page 2-post28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.")
2. Never questioned why cops showed up. Yes, you did. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
3. Rhetorically asking why no security or security videos? You asked that repeatedly. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
4. Dunno if there was anyone else in the house. You repeatedly pretended there was a third person in the house. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house.
5. Why won't cops let us see the video? That as been explained to you nearly every time you ask the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
6. Pics clearly show the glass is outside the house. You break into house from the outsid by smashing a window, nearly all the glass goes in. Common sense. Basic physics. Shocking people can be convinced to believe otherwise. Wrong. Been explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more.
1. I said the guy showed up without a hammer and that the hammer was Pelosi's. Did not say a hammer was never found. One lie for you; none for me.
Yes you did. This was pointed out to you with citations, just above. You are now lying about previously lying. See page 2-post 25, page 2-post 28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.").
Carmine wrote:
2. Yep. We were fed several different stories as to why the cops were there. How is that my lie? Two lies for you; none for me
You weren't "fed" anything except the facts set forth in the California Motion to Detain and in the federal Criminal Complaint against DePope.
The fact that you repeated, via the JAQing off technique, a bunch of clearly unsupported, unsubstantiated and/false facts and conspiracy theories that were conjured up and posted on the internet by like-minded conspiracy idiots makes you a similar liar for posting them. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
Carmine wrote:
3. You completely made that up. Three to zero
Wrong. You're a liar. You repeatedly and rhetorically asked why there were no security and no security videos. JAQing off is lying. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
Those videos played in court are NOW publicly released, and you can watch them on Youtube. See below. They show EXACTLY what was described in the state and federal charging documents.
Carmine wrote:
4. There may have been a 3rd person in the house. We don't know. Asking the question is not a lie. 4-0
You are a liar. There was no third person in the house. No third person involved. You can pretend to question that (JAQing off) all you want, you are still a liar. JAQing off is lying. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house. See also state and federal criminal charges.
Carmine wrote:
5. How is asking why the cops won't show us the bodycam footage a lie? Seems a judge had ordered its release now. 5-0.
JAQing off is lying. JAQing off and pretending there is some sinister, criminal reason for not releasing bodycam video (e.g., it doesn't exist, or shows something other than police say it does) is lying. It was explained to you nearly every time you asked the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
Furthermore, bodycam and house surveillance videos are now publicly released and show EXACTLY what was described in state and federal charging documents.
Carmine wrote:
6. Sorry. You smash in a window from the outside, most of the glass goes in, not out. They have tricked you into not having any common sense . 6-0
Wrong. There was glass inside and outside. Glass shatters everywhere when busted with a hammer. Glass shatter was explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more. You are by now WELL AWARE how glass shatters when hit with a hammer, and all efforts by you to pretend otherwise are lies.
Furthermore, it doesn't matter if the all the busted glass ended up on the fvcking roof. Here is a video of your fellow conspiracy-minded idiot DePope busting into the Pelosi home via the glass doors with a hammer in precisely the way described in the state and federal charging documents. No one except you and like-minded conspiracy whackos care where the busted glass landed.
Home security footage from the home of Paul and Nancy Pelosi shows DePape walking up to a back patio door, peering inside, and breaking the glass before ente...
It has been explained over and over. he was befriending the guy to get him to calm the eff down.
I had to do this once with some crazy homeless lunatic at a park with my family. You pretend to be their best bud and get them talking. And let them talk. And let them talk more. Then you compliment them. And then they calm down. Just guessing here but it looked like he was calm but then snapped back into his craziness right when the police yelled at him.
I think you're doing some pretty amazing mental gymnastics to think that an 80 year old Pelosi was able to calm this crazy person who remained calm throughout the entire time he and Paul were alone, when Paul called the police, when the police knocked, until we got to the point where the door was open and we see them together and he snaps.
The one hurdle which no one has explained away is how the Pelosi's as I stated one of the most hated families in America, worth $200M ish have no security, not even an alarm system engaged. This alone should raise all kinds of red flags to the story being presented. There have been multiple people who have come forward with incidents of being met by armed guard when going to the Pelosi's when no one was home, so we're to believe Paul was alone at the house when this guy came, plus no alarm system was set?
On one hand we have this story that seems insanely far fetched being true. On the other we have what became politically an incredibly convenient story being staged about a week before the election. Given pretty much every narrative the Democrats pushing since Trump walked down the stairs has been blown up I'm remaining skeptical based on the fact pattern.
Please seek help for your paranoid delusions and mental instability.
1. I said the guy showed up without a hammer and that the hammer was Pelosi's. Did not say a hammer was never found. One lie for you; none for me.
Yes you did. This was pointed out to you with citations, just above. You are now lying about previously lying. See page 2-post 25, page 2-post 28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.").
Carmine wrote:
2. Yep. We were fed several different stories as to why the cops were there. How is that my lie? Two lies for you; none for me
You weren't "fed" anything except the facts set forth in the California Motion to Detain and in the federal Criminal Complaint against DePope.
The fact that you repeated, via the JAQing off technique, a bunch of clearly unsupported, unsubstantiated and/false facts and conspiracy theories that were conjured up and posted on the internet by like-minded conspiracy idiots makes you a similar liar for posting them. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
Carmine wrote:
3. You completely made that up. Three to zero
Wrong. You're a liar. You repeatedly and rhetorically asked why there were no security and no security videos. JAQing off is lying. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
Those videos played in court are NOW publicly released, and you can watch them on Youtube. See below. They show EXACTLY what was described in the state and federal charging documents.
Carmine wrote:
4. There may have been a 3rd person in the house. We don't know. Asking the question is not a lie. 4-0
You are a liar. There was no third person in the house. No third person involved. You can pretend to question that (JAQing off) all you want, you are still a liar. JAQing off is lying. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house. See also state and federal criminal charges.
Carmine wrote:
5. How is asking why the cops won't show us the bodycam footage a lie? Seems a judge had ordered its release now. 5-0.
JAQing off is lying. JAQing off and pretending there is some sinister, criminal reason for not releasing bodycam video (e.g., it doesn't exist, or shows something other than police say it does) is lying. It was explained to you nearly every time you asked the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
Furthermore, bodycam and house surveillance videos are now publicly released and show EXACTLY what was described in state and federal charging documents.
Carmine wrote:
6. Sorry. You smash in a window from the outside, most of the glass goes in, not out. They have tricked you into not having any common sense . 6-0
Wrong. There was glass inside and outside. Glass shatters everywhere when busted with a hammer. Glass shatter was explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more. You are by now WELL AWARE how glass shatters when hit with a hammer, and all efforts by you to pretend otherwise are lies.
Furthermore, it doesn't matter if the all the busted glass ended up on the fvcking roof. Here is a video of your fellow conspiracy-minded idiot DePope busting into the Pelosi home via the glass doors with a hammer in precisely the way described in the state and federal charging documents. No one except you and like-minded conspiracy whackos care where the busted glass landed.
Very well done! I personally don’t have the desire or energy to research and cite all of that his past BS postings. But it is hilarious to read when you do.
Remarkable. An 80 + year old man has his head bashed in with a hammer by one of their fellow nut jobs and it still isn’t enough for them to deviate from their loyalty to the tribe.
1. I said the guy showed up without a hammer and that the hammer was Pelosi's. Did not say a hammer was never found. One lie for you; none for me.
Yes you did. This was pointed out to you with citations, just above. You are now lying about previously lying. See page 2-post 25, page 2-post 28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.").
Carmine wrote:
2. Yep. We were fed several different stories as to why the cops were there. How is that my lie? Two lies for you; none for me
You weren't "fed" anything except the facts set forth in the California Motion to Detain and in the federal Criminal Complaint against DePope.
The fact that you repeated, via the JAQing off technique, a bunch of clearly unsupported, unsubstantiated and/false facts and conspiracy theories that were conjured up and posted on the internet by like-minded conspiracy idiots makes you a similar liar for posting them. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
Carmine wrote:
3. You completely made that up. Three to zero
Wrong. You're a liar. You repeatedly and rhetorically asked why there were no security and no security videos. JAQing off is lying. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
Those videos played in court are NOW publicly released, and you can watch them on Youtube. See below. They show EXACTLY what was described in the state and federal charging documents.
Carmine wrote:
4. There may have been a 3rd person in the house. We don't know. Asking the question is not a lie. 4-0
You are a liar. There was no third person in the house. No third person involved. You can pretend to question that (JAQing off) all you want, you are still a liar. JAQing off is lying. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house. See also state and federal criminal charges.
Carmine wrote:
5. How is asking why the cops won't show us the bodycam footage a lie? Seems a judge had ordered its release now. 5-0.
JAQing off is lying. JAQing off and pretending there is some sinister, criminal reason for not releasing bodycam video (e.g., it doesn't exist, or shows something other than police say it does) is lying. It was explained to you nearly every time you asked the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
Furthermore, bodycam and house surveillance videos are now publicly released and show EXACTLY what was described in state and federal charging documents.
Carmine wrote:
6. Sorry. You smash in a window from the outside, most of the glass goes in, not out. They have tricked you into not having any common sense . 6-0
Wrong. There was glass inside and outside. Glass shatters everywhere when busted with a hammer. Glass shatter was explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more. You are by now WELL AWARE how glass shatters when hit with a hammer, and all efforts by you to pretend otherwise are lies.
Furthermore, it doesn't matter if the all the busted glass ended up on the fvcking roof. Here is a video of your fellow conspiracy-minded idiot DePope busting into the Pelosi home via the glass doors with a hammer in precisely the way described in the state and federal charging documents. No one except you and like-minded conspiracy whackos care where the busted glass landed.
Looks like time for a walk down memory lane to review the worst, most unhinged, most uninformed takes on this story from the first 20 pages. No surprise, but there's a lot of familiar names here.
But let's welcome a newcomer, fitz.
fitz wrote:
Do any of the regular Leftist brain-dead morons in this thread ever come back to it now that we know that the entire original "story" from the media was fake?
Then there's the tag team duo of Jamin...
Jamin wrote:
Does anyone honestly believe this story? It's almost like "They" are getting lazy with the fake news they always generate close to midterm election day.
...immediately echoed by his slightly slower alt, Koko the Gorilla.
Koko the Gorilla wrote:
Didn't buy that it was a politically motivated attack. And I was right
Not to be outdone, Ghost of Disco Gary took the disinformation campaign and ran with it.
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
So, Paul Pelosi is a closet gay and they had a lover's spat.
In second place for our resident stopped clock, here's TheAdultInTheRoom.
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Will you admit you're an idiot when this story is memory holed because the attack had absolutely nothing to do with politics?
I'd say it's high time for an admission, beginning with TheAdult himself. An admission of ignorance, or to a secure facility. Take your pick.
But nothing quite beats the premature crowing of Kobbs Hessler.
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
The best thing about this thread is capturing on record all the people who instantly believed the (obvious) lie that this was some kind of right wing terrorist assault. It was not that. The police scanner audio is the smoking gun that Paul knew David and the visit was consensual. The sad part is how many people both here, in the broader media, and around the county bought this fake story hook, line, and sinker and ran with it. The infuriating part about this story is how a national leader can be so poisonous that she would deliberately push a false narrative, knowing full well how it would play out across the country. The good news is that Internet sleuths (definitely NOT the mainstream media) needed less than a day to pick apart the lie. It'll take a while for the truth to seep out to the masses, but that seepage is ongoing and picking up steam.
This thread definitely put people on record and illustrated some sad things about society, just not the things KH thought. Pretty much the opposite, actually. The praise for "Internet sleuths" rockets this revealing comment all the way into first place for absolute worst, most humiliating mistake on this whole thread.
Remember, kids: Don't believe a word these people say. They're either paid for this garbage, or they can't even tell the difference between fact and fiction anymore.
Looks like time for a walk down memory lane to review the worst, most unhinged, most uninformed takes on this story from the first 20 pages. No surprise, but there's a lot of familiar names here.
But let's welcome a newcomer, fitz.
Then there's the tag team duo of Jamin...
...immediately echoed by his slightly slower alt, Koko the Gorilla.
Not to be outdone, Ghost of Disco Gary took the disinformation campaign and ran with it.
In second place for our resident stopped clock, here's TheAdultInTheRoom.
I'd say it's high time for an admission, beginning with TheAdult himself. An admission of ignorance, or to a secure facility. Take your pick.
But nothing quite beats the premature crowing of Kobbs Hessler.
This thread definitely put people on record and illustrated some sad things about society, just not the things KH thought. Pretty much the opposite, actually. The praise for "Internet sleuths" rockets this revealing comment all the way into first place for absolute worst, most humiliating mistake on this whole thread.
Remember, kids: Don't believe a word these people say. They're either paid for this garbage, or they can't even tell the difference between fact and fiction anymore.
How enlightening. Sad, but informative.
And these idiots post all over this forum on every topic under the sun. Complete morons who are wrong every time.