hi mo lama wrote:
Cog Diss Much? wrote:
Wrong. It's a thread with several consistently obtuse liberals, like yourself, failing to address the "gotcha" -- i.e., conundrum -- that clearly does exist, and engaging in various dodges solely because they can't bring themselves to violate what sadly has become Liberal Rule No. 1 -- never contradict anything BLM says or does. The "gotcha," ironically, is self-created.
You couldn't even bring yourself to address the only real issue this thread presents: Is BLM correct when it claims that the vaccine requirements (e.g., must show vaccine card to sit inside a restaurant) are a racist tool to keep black people out of various places? I'm betting you won't ever answer that. See Liberal Rule No. 1.
BLM's claims regarding the vaccine requirements are absurd (as well as dangerous). Absolutely absurd. Deep down, in places you are afraid to go, you know they are. And just as with the widespread BLM looting and riots of 2020, the set of facts that sparked the latest claims and behavior is presented fraudulently. Your deeply ingrained biases and desire for virtue signaling will just never allow you to admit that. See Liberal Rule No. 1.
What exactly are you looking for a liberal to say? It's all common sense.
Do we support the notion that black lives matter? Of course. Do we want to see them commit violence? No. Do we think the vaccination requirements are inherently racist? No. Do we understand their fear of the requirements being misused in a way that hurts black people? Of course, there is plenty of history to support that fear. Do we still wish everyone would get vaccinated anyway? Yes.
Hey, there is a decent answer there buried in the generalities and rhetorical platitudes ("Of course,"). I admire the attempt. You are the only admitted liberal in this thread that I see even trying it.