Isn't it wild how in 2022 whenever we are shown pics or videos of news stories they are inevitably of such poor quality?
-
17
-
carmine9 wrote:
Pol Quaomy wrote:
Well done. A great list of disingenuous posters and their failures.
But no list can be complete without mentioning Carmine, who gets an award for his endless JAQing off with previously answered, irrelevant, false, debunked and/or inane "questions" in the quise of conspiracy allegations. Carmine will JAQ off, no matter how many times he gets un-JAQed.
At numerous and various times, Carmine questioned why there was no hammer found (it was), why the police even showed up at the Pelosi's to begin with (because Pelosi called 911), why Pelosi and DiPape were in their underwear (they weren't), why there were no security videos (there are), who the unknown third person in the home was (there wasn't a third person), why police won't release videos (answered numerous times), and his idiotic favorite - why is broken glass only outside the home (broken glass is both inside and outside, and numerous videos show that is how glass shatters when struck). For this sustained absurdity, Carmine makes the list of the thread's unhinged.
1. Never claimed no hammer was found.
2. Never questioned why cops showed up.
3. Never claimed anyone was in their underwear.
4. Dunno if there was anyone else in the house.
5. Why won't cops let us see the video?
6. Pics clearly show the glass is outside the house. You break into house from the outsid by smashing a window, nearly all the glass goes in. Common sense. Basic physics. Shocking people can be convinced to believe otherwise.
1. Never claimed no hammer was found. Yes you did.See page 2-post 25, page 2-post28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.")
2. Never questioned why cops showed up. Yes, you did. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
3. Rhetorically asking why no security or security videos? You asked that repeatedly. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
4. Dunno if there was anyone else in the house. You repeatedly pretended there was a third person in the house. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house.
5. Why won't cops let us see the video? That as been explained to you nearly every time you ask the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
6. Pics clearly show the glass is outside the house. You break into house from the outsid by smashing a window, nearly all the glass goes in. Common sense. Basic physics. Shocking people can be convinced to believe otherwise. Wrong. Been explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more.
74 -
Spare us the loggorhea, knucklehead, half this board is still on dial-up.
It's 2022 and there's zero video evidence released to back the government story -- why?
And even given Pelosi getting highly preferential medical treatment, how do explain his rapid recovery, while DePape sits on ice, no photos allowed -- again, why?
If this is such an open shut case, the release of even a smidgen of video or photos would not jeopardize a g.d. thing.
48 -
Ho Chi Minh Sub 5 Mile wrote:
It's 2022 and there's zero video evidence released to back the government story -- why?
What, am I supposed to guess why you think there is "zero video evidence"? Just post it. Tell us why you think that is.
JAQoffer no. 2 wrote:
And even given Pelosi getting highly preferential medical treatment, how do explain his rapid recovery, while DePape sits on ice, no photos allowed -- again, why?Just tell us why to both of your "questions." Why would you want me to guess what you think? Jesus Christ, just man up and post your theories. They can't more be more demented and embarrassing than Igloo's new sex-slave theory.
41 -
carmine9 wrote:
Isn't it wild how in 2022 whenever we are shown pics or videos of news stories they are inevitably of such poor quality?
You know that "zoom and enhance" is just a plot device on the TV and not how video evidence really works, right?
Ah, well. Six statements, six lies. About par for the course.
41 -
my 2c wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Isn't it wild how in 2022 whenever we are shown pics or videos of news stories they are inevitably of such poor quality?
You know that "zoom and enhance" is just a plot device on the TV and not how video evidence really works, right?
Ah, well. Six statements, six lies. About par for the course.
10 -
Apparently he has recovered enough to dump a few million of google stock with perfect timing.
62 -
Hammer Time
21 -
Pol Quaomy wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
1. Never claimed no hammer was found.
2. Never questioned why cops showed up.
3. Never claimed anyone was in their underwear.
4. Dunno if there was anyone else in the house.
5. Why won't cops let us see the video?
6. Pics clearly show the glass is outside the house. You break into house from the outsid by smashing a window, nearly all the glass goes in. Common sense. Basic physics. Shocking people can be convinced to believe otherwise.
1. Never claimed no hammer was found. Yes you did.See page 2-post 25, page 2-post28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.")
2. Never questioned why cops showed up. Yes, you did. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
3. Rhetorically asking why no security or security videos? You asked that repeatedly. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
4. Dunno if there was anyone else in the house. You repeatedly pretended there was a third person in the house. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house.
5. Why won't cops let us see the video? That as been explained to you nearly every time you ask the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
6. Pics clearly show the glass is outside the house. You break into house from the outsid by smashing a window, nearly all the glass goes in. Common sense. Basic physics. Shocking people can be convinced to believe otherwise. Wrong. Been explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more.
1. I said the guy showed up without a hammer and that the hammer was Pelosi's. Did not say a hammer was never found. One lie for you; none for me.
2. Yep. We were fed several different stories as to why the cops were there. How is that my lie? Two lies for you; none for me
3. You completely made that up. Three to zero
4. There may have been a 3rd person in the house. We don't know. Asking the question is not a lie. 4-0.
5. How is asking why the cops won't show us the bodycam footage a lie? Seems a judge had ordered its release now. 5-0.
6. Sorry. You smash in a window from the outside, most of the glass goes in, not out. They have tricked you into not having any common sense . 6-0
13 -
grifter wrote:
Apparently he has recovered enough to dump a few million of google stock with perfect timing.
Hence The Pelosi Act.
Which makes total sense.
And won't pass
23 -
#1571
This post was removed.
-
Video is here!
Pelosi was smiling, holding drink in his left hand. drunk and in his underwear.
42 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Video is here!
Pelosi was smiling, holding drink in his left hand. drunk and in his underwear.
You're right, the video shows pretty clearly that Pelosi was hammered.
41 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Video is here!
Pelosi was smiling, holding drink in his left hand. drunk and in his underwear.
A gay lovers quarrel or a drug deal gone bad cannot be ruled out, but that drink in Pelosi's hand doesn't make any sense unless he & DePape already were already "friends".
42 -
Does this look like a guy who's in fear for his life? I cannot wait for the libs to spin this.
33 -
???! wrote:
agip wrote:
Still not going to read this cesspool of a thread, but the ‘underwear’ story has been retracted and corrected. Didn’t happen. See at the bottom of the story.but the dumb rubes won’t care about corrections. Don’t be a dumb rube.
The "underwear" story was told to the investigative reporter for that TV station by his normal trusted sources. He would not have printed that without being confident it was true.
The story was later denied.
I will believe it is a coverup until film is released showing otherwise.
Hey agip, Pelosi WAS in his underwear. Ha!!!
42 -
imagine a $100-millionaire getting a prostitute that's female, but a 3/10 like him
LOL
21 -
ugly wrote:
imagine a $100-millionaire getting a prostitute that's female, but a 3/10 like him
LOL
Paul Pelosi is a closet gay. Just as I have been saying all along. Sorry libs.
22 -
Watch for "Part One: Before The Cops Arrived" to be released on Pornhub later today.
23
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun