Nancy Pelosi's husband "violently assaulted" in their San Francisco home

Non-Running Politics

Page 73 of 84

1 72 73 74 84

1 year ago 11/06/2022 5:29pm EST

re: carmine9

carmine9 wrote:
Seems Glenn Greenwald feels the official narrative should be questioned.
Video:www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sj7YlBSIIH8

Greenwald is saying that it's worth questioning mainstream narratives. He does not seem to claim that he knows either way for sure what happened.

Here's the thing, why is it that multiple people that knew this guy personally talk about his mental illness? All these people knew him well but nobody knew he was gay? His own family didn't know he was gay? Their secret gay relationship was so secret that nobody else knew in this day and age of everything being recorded?

Highly unlikely to most of us.

1 year ago 11/06/2022 5:38pm EST

re: carmine9

carmine9 wrote:
Wow. Thinking glass on the outside of the house rather than inside (as proven by photos) brings into question that the glass was broken from the outside is so crazy. You ever smash in a window? I have. Nearly all the glass ends up inside. Try it.
Or that the deranged intruder bent on hurting people allowed Pelosi to go into the bathroom does not seem weird. And that, when Pelosi called the cops from the bathroom the intruder witnessed this, he did nothing to stop Pelosi. Nothing questionable there.
Or that there was a 1/2 hour lapse between the call and the arrival of the cops and wondering what went on during that time. Only a madman would be curious about that.
Or why we are shown no video evidence not anything from the cops bodycams. Who would want to see that?
Or how Pelosi opened the door with one hand while in a life and death stuggle with a madman. And why he did not go to the cops but instead returned to the guy trying to hrm him with a hammer. Why would anyone question that.
The real question of course is why so many posters find these questions "dangerous" and cry for censorhip.
Someone want to explain that to me?

Even if one were to take all this conspiracy theoretic skepticism at face value, all that the nutjobs here have put forward is the theory that Paul Pelosi is a closeted old gay man and Depape his gay hooker or something like that, but even if that were true, nothing of consequence changes.

The nutjob strategy is to endlessly try to sow doubt by insisting that we don’t know what we don’t know, but something surely is fishy here.

1 year ago 11/06/2022 5:56pm EST

re: carmine9

carmine9 wrote:
Wow. Thinking glass on the outside of the house rather than inside (as proven by photos) brings into question that the glass was broken from the outside is so crazy. You ever smash in a window? I have. Nearly all the glass ends up inside. Try it.

The photo clearly shows glass inside the house.

1 year ago 11/06/2022 6:12pm EST

re: Kobbs Hessler

why is this news? liberals as they racists discriminate white people everyday. that should be the topic. not a single assault.

The radical leftist democrats (demon-rats) have to disprove all of the made up scenarios I have in my head before I will even begin to believe them.

1 year ago 11/06/2022 6:25pm EST

re: carmine9

carmine9 wrote:
Imagine wanting to see the video evidence.
So dangerous.
What is wrong with you normies?

Since you are too thick to understand, I'll try one more time. When do the cops actually divulge their evidence that will be presented to court, if it is not for the purpose of solving the case? Doesn't this clearly show you that, no Unkle Carmine, they do not require your assistance , thanks for offering.

1 year ago 11/07/2022 6:00am EST

re: Well, ok then!

Well, ok then! wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Wow. Thinking glass on the outside of the house rather than inside (as proven by photos) brings into question that the glass was broken from the outside is so crazy. You ever smash in a window? I have. Nearly all the glass ends up inside. Try it.
The photo clearly shows glass inside the house.

streetloc.com

Look at the broken glass at Nancy Pelosi’s house. Paul Pelosi attacker not charged with “breaking and entering”.

Laura Loomer

Look at the broken glass at Nancy Pelosi’s house. It’s on the outside. If it was a break in most of the glass would be on the inside. This indicates the glass was broken from the inside of the house. Notice the alleged attack...

Link:streetloc.com/view-post/look-at-the-br...

1 year ago 11/07/2022 6:04am EST

re: I am Sam

I am Sam wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Imagine wanting to see the video evidence.
So dangerous.
What is wrong with you normies?
Since you are too thick to understand, I'll try one more time. When do the cops actually divulge their evidence that will be presented to court, if it is not for the purpose of solving the case? Doesn't this clearly show you that, no Unkle Carmine, they do not require your assistance , thanks for offering.

I have heard that BS before.

Not true.

The cops put out into the public and to the media whatever will push their narrative.

Remember the Boston Marathon bombing where we were told the case was solved via a video showing Bro # 2 placing a bomb? But they were not going to show us at that time (even though they were declaring the Bros guilty and showing pics of them at the finish line). Turned out they never did show any such video -- including a trial. It was made up.

1 year ago 11/07/2022 9:45am EST

re: carmine9

YouTube.com

'Very weird' and 'strange detail' about attack on Paul Pelosi

Sky News Australia

Sky News host Paul Murray says there is something “very weird” with a “strange bit of detail” about the attack on US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband Pau...

Video:www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbv11x4nUd8

1 year ago 11/07/2022 10:00am EST

re: carmine9

carmine9 wrote:
Video:www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbv11x4nUd8

"The piece should not have aired because it did not meet NBC News reporting standards."

In other words, NBC aired something that asn't adequately supported, realized its mistake, and withdrew the story.

Good. That's what responsible journalists/editors do when they fuck up (which, we all can agree, they sometimes do).

As opposed to anything you would ever see happen on Breitbart, say.

1 year ago 11/07/2022 10:52am EST

re: carmine9

carmine9 wrote:
I am Sam wrote:
Since you are too thick to understand, I'll try one more time. When do the cops actually divulge their evidence that will be presented to court, if it is not for the purpose of solving the case? Doesn't this clearly show you that, no Unkle Carmine, they do not require your assistance , thanks for offering.
I have heard that BS before.
Not true.
The cops put out into the public and to the media whatever will push their narrative.
Remember the Boston Marathon bombing where we were told the case was solved via a video showing Bro # 2 placing a bomb? But they were not going to show us at that time (even though they were declaring the Bros guilty and showing pics of them at the finish line). Turned out they never did show any such video -- including a trial. It was made up.

But you've proven to have lied hundreds of times,yet still waffle on.

1 year ago 11/07/2022 10:55am EST

re: q5y4

q5y4 wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Video:www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbv11x4nUd8
"The piece should not have aired because it did not meet NBC News reporting standards."
In other words, NBC aired something that asn't adequately supported, realized its mistake, and withdrew the story.
Good. That's what responsible journalists/editors do when they f%ck up (which, we all can agree, they sometimes do).
As opposed to anything you would ever see happen on Breitbart, say.

No.

I other words it was re-writing the story to fit the current official narrative.

Yikes. You guys still believe the MSM.

What will it take?

1 year ago 11/07/2022 10:56am EST

re: q5y4

q5y4 wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Video:www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbv11x4nUd8
"The piece should not have aired because it did not meet NBC News reporting standards."
In other words, NBC aired something that asn't adequately supported, realized its mistake, and withdrew the story.
Good. That's what responsible journalists/editors do when they f%ck up (which, we all can agree, they sometimes do).
As opposed to anything you would ever see happen on Breitbart, say.

Interesting that you can post with a profanity but when I replied -- it would not post due to the profanity you used!

1 year ago 11/07/2022 10:58am EST

re: carmine9

carmine9 wrote:
Interesting that you can post with a profanity but when I replied -- it would not post due to the profanity you used!

LIBERAL CONSPIRACY ALERT!!!!!!!!!!!!

CALL THE POLICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1 year ago 11/07/2022 11:52am EST

re: q5y4

q5y4 wrote:
carmine9 wrote:
Video:www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbv11x4nUd8
"The piece should not have aired because it did not meet NBC News reporting standards."
In other words, NBC aired something that asn't adequately supported, realized its mistake, and withdrew the story.
Good. That's what responsible journalists/editors do when they [fūck] up (which, we all can agree, they sometimes do).
As opposed to anything you would ever see happen on Breitbart, say.

Hah, @q5y4 is a privileged user that gets to say fūck. Not that he’s saying anything wrong.

1 year ago 11/07/2022 11:56am EST

re: BhaktaDon

Let’s take this from the top. I’m going to unify both political parties in this thread. First up: can we all agree Paul Pelosi exists as an actual human? Yes or yes?

1 year ago 11/07/2022 12:09pm EST

re: carmine9

carmine9 wrote:
Well, ok then! wrote:
The photo clearly shows glass inside the house.
Link:streetloc.com/view-post/look-at-the-br...

I actually feel really, really bad for anyone who would share something written by Laura Loomer.

Seriously, do you know who she is?

1 year ago 11/07/2022 12:35pm EST

re: Rick Cheney

Rick Cheney wrote:
Let’s take this from the top. I’m going to unify both political parties in this thread. First up: can we all agree Paul Pelosi exists as an actual human? Yes or yes?

Might be a lizard person, so idk. ;-)

1 year ago 11/07/2022 12:41pm EST

re: MelRnr

MelRnr wrote:
Rick Cheney wrote:
Let’s take this from the top. I’m going to unify both political parties in this thread. First up: can we all agree Paul Pelosi exists as an actual human? Yes or yes?
Might be a lizard person, so idk. ;-)

Has the my pillow guy chimed in on the situation?

1 year ago 11/07/2022 1:56pm EST

re: carmine9

carmine9 wrote:
Remember the Boston Marathon bombing where we were told the case was solved via a video showing Bro # 2 placing a bomb? But they were not going to show us at that time (even though they were declaring the Bros guilty and showing pics of them at the finish line). Turned out they never did show any such video -- including a trial. It was made up.

Interesting site to be going full "Free Dzhokhar Tsarnaev" on. If you find yourself taking sides with a convicted terrorist and child murderer, maybe what the world needs is not your ideas about public health and foreign policy.

Page 73 of 84

1 72 73 74 84

Next Last

Reply Replying to

Username

Password

Leave the password field blank to post anonymously.

Post Preview

By posting you acknowledge that you have read and abide by our Terms and Conditions.

Remember me on this device.

Nancy Pelosi's husband "violently assaulted" in their San Francisco home

Of General Interest

This thread has already been deleted.

You have been subscribed.

Nancy Pelosi's husband "violently assaulted" in their San Francisco home

Jump To A Page

Follow BhaktaDon

Block BhaktaDon

Follow I am Sam

Block I am Sam

Follow carmine9

Block carmine9

Follow carmine9

Block carmine9

Follow carmine9

Block carmine9

Follow carmine9

Block carmine9

Follow carmine9

Block carmine9

Follow BhaktaDon

Block BhaktaDon

Follow Rick Cheney

Block Rick Cheney

Follow RossiCheated

Block RossiCheated

Follow Rick Cheney

Block Rick Cheney

Jump To A Page

Of General Interest

This thread has already been deleted.

Reply Replying to

You have been subscribed.