Source #1: Press release, Japan astro society
Source #2: Some random blogger
Source #3: plausibly in Science press (India), but just as a brief news item ( "Correspondence")
Source #4: Chinese astro society press release
Source #5: Another random Internet dude
Source #6: Scott & Teonov, a non-scientific history-esque book
Source #7: An in-house British Interplanetary Society mag 2-page short blurb (unclear if peer-reviewed)
Source #8, #34, #36 : Neil Armstrong biographer
Source #9: "Physics Education" magazine, not a scholarly journal, but an education one
Source #10: South African "Feature Article", just a transcript of a talk, ("Tonight I hope to inspire...")
Source #11: Another random Internet site
Source #12: "Independent Star News" contemporary news article
Source #13: NASA technical report (not peer-reviewed AFAICT, no reason to believe NASA of/c)
Source #14: Random internet junk
Source #15: Transcript of historian
Source #16: News item about Russian recordings being released
Source #17: News item about Russian recordings being released
Source #18: Louisville, KY newspaper claims local folk (ham-radio) could tap into the feed
Source #19: More of the same (Otter Creek observatory)
Source #20: "Comment" in Bulletin of Atomic Scientists (again not a science paper)
Source #21-23: Article in hobbyist Radio Relay magazine
Source #24: Claims of a German instrument manufacturer to detect the mission (advert, not a science pub)
Source #25: Some random Internet page
Source #26: Lunar Samples (Geochemistry journal)
Source #27; Political award to astronauts
Source #28: More chemical rock/soil sources.
Source #29, #32, #33, #41, #53: Hobbyist journal blurb (Astronomy)
Source #30: "Science@NASA" tells us what Neil & Buzz left behind
Source #31: Laser reflector catalog item
Source #35: Some sort of conference proceedings (likely not peer-reviewed), 4 pages describing how French helped
Source #37: Lunar Laser Ranging Experiment, Science, 1973
Source #38: webpage regarding #37
Source #39: more on laser ranging, conference proceedings, but looks more respectable than some
Source #40, #42, #43, #45, #46: News item from NASA
Source #44: Link to front page of German institute
Source #47: Another blog "proof"
Source #48: BBC News item
Source #49: Skeptical Inquirer article
Source #50: Historical publication about how the Aussies were involved with Apollo 11 (due to sunrise times in USA)
Source #51-52: See #14
Source #54: Berkeley biography of someone
Source #55: Telegraph article claiming new tech will "really prove" the moon landings....