Legit question wrote:
1. Global Positioning Systems are based on cell-tower triangulation and this accompanying video explains how it’s done.
https://youtu.be/RNHnU48E-MI2. The next mode of propagating data is through undersea cable. As you can see on the map below, cables connect all the continents with redundancy. There’s an excellent website here that explains how undersea cable is laid and it also lists the advantages of cable versus satellites.
http://thednetworks.com/2012/03/21/how-are-undersea-cables-laid-in-the-oceans-advantages-over-satellite/3. Satellites aren’t used because they can’t carry terabytes of data for less than a billion dollars per communication line.
The bandwidth available using a single fiber optic cable and a laser beam is much much greater than you can get from a single satellite radio channel. This is due to the higher frequency and shorter wavelength of light compared to microwaves. The higher the frequency, the greater the bandwidth.
An undersea cable is a bundle many fiber optic cables. Consider each fiber cable as a channel. You can have more channels, each with a higher capacity, than you can build radio channels into a satellite.
The uplinks and downlinks cost and putting the satellite in space is a huge huge ask and far more risky. Finally, you can fix a broken cable. Once you launch the satellite you don’t get a chance to fix it if it gets broke.
4. Besides land-based technologies, the illusion of Satellites are covered by Light-Than-Air-Vehicles (LAV), High Altitude Airships (HAA) and High Altitude Platforms (HAP).
- Lockheed Martin has built more than 8,000 lighter-than-air platforms which is a pretty significant number for that fact alone. They also have a brochure about LTA’s. Here:
https://www.scribd.com/mobile/document/274441635/Lighter-Than-Air-BrochureLTA’s are said to reach altitudes of 70,000 ft, but 100,000 ft and higher have been attained. LTA’s also have the capability to maintain a geosynchronous position that satellites purport to do also. With the massive amount of money that NASA embezzles you can bet they’ve poured significant resources into developing these platforms. The more cost-efficient platforms, the bigger the profit margins are in NASA’s fake satellite deployments. It’s also important to remember that without the illusion of satellites and probes, NASA could not pretend to venture into the void of space to explore and reveal the wonders of the cosmos.
HAA’s, LTA’s and HAP’s can take all shapes and are mis-perceived as satellites by the gullible public. Besides High Altitude Airshsips there are HALE (High Altitude Long Endurance) stations or SPR (Stratospheric Platform Radios).
5. If that’s not enough to cast doubt on the existence of satellites check out Project Loon by Google. Their motto is “Balloon Powered Internet For Everyone†Info here:
https://www.solveforx.com/loon6. No “Real Pictures or Video†exists proving satellites are whizzing around the globe, not a one! Think how preposterous it is that one of the other thousand plus satellites couldn’t snap a simple picture or shoot a few frames of video? We have no visual evidence of actual satellites, the only evidence offered are the sophomoric Photoshop/CGI/ Pixar images/fake artwork.
NASA cannot furnish a single actual photo or video footage of real satellites.
Don't fall for NASA's bullshit.
Which is more probable. That satellites exist but NASA seems incapable of confirming their existence or simply they do not exist at all? Occam’s Razor makes it simple. They don't exist at all!!