RE: 646,000 likes on Facebook Page to boycott A&E until Phil Robertson is back on the air.

living in reality wrote:

K5 wrote:

Since he provided no link that would be difficult to do.

Keep scrolling down the page.

In see it.

Sorry.

Listening to the video it seems clear he is reading from a text.

The Bible perhaps?

living in reality wrote:

jeffrey d. boomhauer wrote:

If you happen to believe certain sexual behavior is harmful, you're a bigot?

That attitude is why A&E has their as$ in a crack right now..

I'm still waiting for an intelligent explanation on how homosexuality is harmful.

Death of a species?

funny how these quackers seem to leave out certain parts of the bible while focusing on others

from Corinthians 11:14 (part of the same section that he quoted from in GQ)

14 "Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him"

The Economy wrote:

funny how these quackers seem to leave out certain parts of the bible while focusing on others

from Corinthians 11:14 (part of the same section that he quoted from in GQ)

14 "Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him"

True Dat.

There is a lot of really sick sh*t in the Old Testament.

The New Testament (the Christian stuff) is pretty damn good

and now the truth starts to leak out:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/20/duck-dynasty-creator-scott-gurney-starred-in-indie-gay-porn-film/

K5 wrote:

Death of a species?

You clearly haven't studied evolutionary biology. Many examples of homosexuality in nature, all of which follow Hamilton's rule (rB>C; I'll let you look it up if you're interested). If you're unfamiliar with this, it basically says that it can be evolutionarily advantageous for an individual NOT to reproduce if it can help ensure the survival and reproduction of individuals closely related to it. Hamilton's rule is widely applied (i.e. it's not just made up to justify homosexuality).

So basically homosexuality is natural, and there's a reason for it. It's not that something went wrong with somebody, it's just who they are.

Even if you haven't studied animal behavior or evolutionary biology, just from a rational standpoint, you honestly think that if we allow gays the same civil rights as straights, the human species will die out?

GLAAD loses. Phil is back on the show.

Duck hunters - 1, dick hunters - 0

Haha, right! Its a financial decision and that trumps GLAAD or any advocacy group (except maybe the NAACP). I saw another article where Daystar network was offering them a prime time slot, so I think A&E had their featheres ruffled by other networks willing to take them aboard, no doubt a Fox owned company possibly one of them.They would be IDIOTS to lose their cash cow.

Duck Dynasty rules! wrote:

GLAAD loses. Phil is back on the show.

Duck hunters - 1, dick hunters - 0

Everyone knew he'd get back on the air. I'm surprised there is a 150+ post thread about it. As an aside, he and those trying to prevent gay marriage are on the wrong side of history, and it's just a matter of time before their opinions will be drowned out.

Lots of hate on this thread

Ah.

The use of unrelated smears by the elites who own the media.

Didn't see that coming?

jeffrey d. boomhauer wrote:

I agree A&E can do whatever they like, just as I agree millions of Americans can give A&E the finger..

Why? Who gave Sumner Redstone (nee Murray Rothstein)the airwaves? I don't remember voting to hand the airwaves over to the economic elites.

Why can they decide who and what we citizens hear?